Diann J. Prosser, Changqing Ding, R. Michael Erwin, Taej Mundkur, Jeffery D. Sullivan, Erle C. Ellis. 2018: Species distribution modeling in regions of high need and limited data: waterfowl of China. Avian Research, 9(1): 7. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-018-0099-4
Citation:
Diann J. Prosser, Changqing Ding, R. Michael Erwin, Taej Mundkur, Jeffery D. Sullivan, Erle C. Ellis. 2018: Species distribution modeling in regions of high need and limited data: waterfowl of China. Avian Research, 9(1): 7. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-018-0099-4
Diann J. Prosser, Changqing Ding, R. Michael Erwin, Taej Mundkur, Jeffery D. Sullivan, Erle C. Ellis. 2018: Species distribution modeling in regions of high need and limited data: waterfowl of China. Avian Research, 9(1): 7. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-018-0099-4
Citation:
Diann J. Prosser, Changqing Ding, R. Michael Erwin, Taej Mundkur, Jeffery D. Sullivan, Erle C. Ellis. 2018: Species distribution modeling in regions of high need and limited data: waterfowl of China. Avian Research, 9(1): 7. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-018-0099-4
A number of conservation and societal issues require understanding how species are distributed on the landscape, yet ecologists are often faced with a lack of data to develop models at the resolution and extent desired, resulting in inefficient use of conservation resources. Such a situation presented itself in our attempt to develop waterfowl distribution models as part of a multi-disciplinary team targeting the control of the highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus in China.
Methods
Faced with limited data, we built species distribution models using a habitat suitability approach for China's breeding and non-breeding (hereafter, wintering) waterfowl. An extensive review of the literature was used to determine model parameters for habitat modeling. Habitat relationships were implemented in GIS using land cover covariates. Wintering models were validated using waterfowl census data, while breeding models, though developed for many species, were only validated for the one species with sufficient telemetry data available.
Results
We developed suitability models for 42 waterfowl species (30 breeding and 39 wintering) at 1 km resolution for the extent of China, along with cumulative and genus level species richness maps. Breeding season models showed highest waterfowl suitability in wetlands of the high-elevation west-central plateau and northeastern China. Wintering waterfowl suitability was highest in the lowland regions of southeastern China. Validation measures indicated strong performance in predicting species presence. Comparing our model outputs to China's protected areas indicated that breeding habitat was generally better covered than wintering habitat, and identified locations for which additional research and protection should be prioritized.
Conclusions
These suitability models are the first available for many of China's waterfowl species, and have direct utility to conservation and habitat planning and prioritizing management of critically important areas, providing an example of how this approach may aid others faced with the challenge of addressing conservation issues with little data to inform decision making.
Ecologically dependent upon wetlands, waterbirds are key biological indicators for assessing the quality and importance of wetlands. Due to impacts of habitat loss, pollution, over-hunting, biological invasions, and climate change, about 23% of global waterbird populations are declining, 19% of waterbirds have been listed as threatened species by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), and some waterbirds with small populations have not been recorded in the field in recent years (Wetlands International 2012). In view of the serious situation of the rapid decrease of waterbird diversity, waterbird conservation has received increasing attention worldwide.
There are a total of 53.6 million hectares of wetlands in China, ranking the first among countries in Asia and the fourth in the world (The State Forestry Administration 2000). Wetland types are diverse in China, including many natural wetlands such as lakes, swamps, rivers, estuaries, and coastal wetlands, as well as artificial wetlands such as paddy fields, aquaculture ponds, salt pans, and reservoirs (The State Forestry Administration 2015). China's extensive wetlands support large numbers of waterbirds. For example, coastal wetlands in China provide critical stopover sites for millions of migratory shorebirds along the East Asian-Australasian flyway (Barter 2002; Bai et al. 2015); Lakes in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River are the largest nonbreeding region for waterbirds in East Asia (Cao and Wong 2007; Wang et al. 2017). Swamps and lakes in northern China provide breeding sites for diverse waterbirds such as cranes, gulls, ducks, and geese (Chen and Ding 2008).
Over the past several decades, many measures have been implemented for waterbird conservation in China, such as establishing nature reserves with waterbirds and wetlands being the main conservation targets, designating key habitats for waterbirds as internationally important wetlands (Ramsar sites), conducting waterbird surveys to clarify population status, carrying out public education on waterbird and wetland conservation, and launching captive breeding to increase the population of threatened species (State Forestry Administration 2015). All these efforts have played critical roles in waterbird conservation. Some waterbirds have gradually recovered from the edge of extinction. For example, only seven individuals were recorded when the Crested Ibis (Nipponia nippon) was discovered in Qinling Mountain in 1981. With effective conservation measures over the past more than 30 years, the number of the Crested Ibis is now over 2000, including more than 1000 individuals in the wild population (Wang et al. 2014). The population number of the Black-faced Spoonbill (Platalea minor) has increased from about 200 birds in the early 1990s to about 3000 birds in recent years (Sung et al. 2018). These achievements in waterbird conservation have become celebrated examples of global biodiversity conservation.
However, with the rapid economic development over the past 40 years, human activities have significantly increased in both range and intensity in China. Waterbird conservation suffered increasing pressure from many aspects. For example, wetland reclamation and exploitation in large scale and high intensity have caused dramatic habitat loss and degradation (Yang et al. 2011; Ma et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2017). Illegal hunting for waterbirds is not uncommon in both coastal and inland regions (Ma et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2017). Increasing toxic pollutants have persisted in wetlands and surrounding regions over a long period (Zhao et al. 2016). The spread of alien invasive species in wetlands has degraded habitat quality for waterbirds (Gan et al. 2009). In addition, climate changes not only alter habitats for waterbirds, but also affect ecological habits of waterbirds and the linkage between waterbirds and other organisms (Iwamura et al. 2013). All these issues have brought different degrees of direct or indirect impacts on waterbirds in China. As a consequence, clarifying population trends of waterbirds as well as identifying threats to waterbirds is fundamental to formulate strategies for waterbird conservation at both national and local levels.
Many studies have discussed the population trends of, threats to, and conservation recommendations for waterbirds at global scales and in Europe and North America (e.g., Thomas et al. 2006; Gilroy et al. 2016; Amano et al. 2017). The population status of and threats to waterbirds in China is increasingly concerned due to China's importance for waterbird conservation along the flyways. For example, in recent years, many studies have indicated that loss of wetlands along China's coast is the most serious threat to migratory shorebirds along the flyway, causing dramatic declines in many populations (Melville et al. 2016; Piersma et al. 2016; Studds et al. 2017). Currently, only a few waterbird species (e.g., some cranes, storks, and spoonbills, ibises, geese) have been well studied in terms of their population dynamics (Liu et al. 2007; Zhang et al. 2010; Luo et al. 2012). There is still a lack of overall analysis on the population status of waterbirds in China. In recent years, along with emphasizing conservation of waterbirds and their wetland habitats by the central and local governments, public awareness in conservation has continuously increased (Ma et al. 2013). This provides opportunities to strengthen waterbird conservation. Meanwhile it is also necessary to understand the population trends of waterbirds in China, so as to provide the basis for formulating national and local policies for waterbird conservation.
Based on collecting data of waterbirds, we analyzed population trends of and threats to waterbirds in China. According to the major threats to waterbirds, we make recommendations for waterbird conservation.
Methods
According to the definition of waterbird by Wetlands International, there are a total of 871 waterbird species in 32 families and 8 orders in the world (Wetlands International 2012). We collected waterbird checklists in China according to the book of A Checklist on the Classification and Distribution of the Birds of China (Zheng 2017). A total of 260 waterbird species in China were identified, belonging to 21 families and 9 orders (Phalacrocoracidae was listed under Pelecaniformes in Wetland International 2012 while under Suliformes in Zheng 2017). We used population trends of China's waterbirds from the waterbird database of Wetlands International (2012). Here population is defined as "a distinct assemblage of individuals that have not undergone a significant emigration or immigration, and interchange of individuals between populations remains at a low level" (Wetlands International 2012). Based on this definition and the distribution range of waterbird population (Wetlands International 2012), there are 293 populations for the 260 waterbird species in China. We collected population trends (increasing, stable, declining, and unknown) for each species. If a species has only one population in China, we used the trend of the population as the trend of the species. If a species has more than one population with different trends in China, we used the trend of the major population in China as the trend of the species.
The threatened levels of waterbirds in China referred to the Red List of China's Vertebrates, which was compiled according to the IUCN criteria (2012) of threatened species (Jiang et al. 2016). Because we aimed at waterbirds with natural distribution, six levels (Critically Endangered, Endangered, Vulnerable, Near Threatened, Least Concern, and Data Deficient) were involved while excluding other three levels (Extinction, Wild Extinction, and Regional Extinction) that species in the levels cannot be recorded in the field. Threatened species include those classified as Critically Endangered, Endangered, or Vulnerable. We identified the number of waterbird species at each level separately. We identified migratory and resident species as well as their distributional range (coastal, inland, and both coastal and inland). We classified waterbirds as migratory and resident species based on the latest version of A Checklist on the Classification and Distribution of the Birds of China (Zheng 2017). Partial migratory species were identified as migratory species. To avoid the effects of small sample size and unequal distribution of data among groups, Fisher's exact tests were used to check whether there was difference in the proportions of population declines between migratory and resident species as well as among groups with different distribution range.
To understand the major threats to the threatened waterbird species, we searched literature collected in the database of Web of Knowledge(http://apps.webofknowledge.com/) and literature published in Chinese in the database of China national knowledge internet (http://www.cnki.net/). We also searched the database of the IUCN Red Lists (http://www.iucnredlist.org/) and the Handbook of Birds of the World (https://www.hbw.com/). Based on literature review, we refined the major threats to the threatened waterbird species in China.
Population trends
Of the total 260 waterbird species in China, 84 (32.3%) species exhibited a declining trend, 35 species (13.5%) remained stable, and 16 species (6.2%) showed an increasing trend. Population trends were unknown for 125 species (48.1%). According to the classification of waterbirds, the proportion of declining species was the highest in Ciconiiformes (66.7%), followed by Anseriformes (38.9%) and Pelecaniformes (34.3%). In addition, there was less than 50% of species with known population trends in Gruiformes, Suliformes, and Podicipediformes (Table 1).
Table
1.
Population trends of waterbirds in China in each order
Most waterbirds in China are migratory birds (91.5%, 238 species). There was no significant difference in population trends between the migratory (32.4% decline) and the resident (31.8% decline) species (Fisher's exact test, p=0.58) (Additional file 1: Table S1). There were 41 species distributed exclusively inland, 56 exclusively on the coasts, and 163 species found both inland and on coasts. There was no significant difference in population trends among waterbirds distributed in various regions (Fisher's exact test, p=0.70) (Additional file 1: Table S2).
Waterbirds and their habitats along China's coasts have been highly concerned over the past decades (see review of Hua et al. 2015). Many studies have indicated that dramatic loss of coastal wetlands, which are critical habitats for many species, is the main reason for waterbird population decline (Melville et al. 2016; Studds et al. 2017). However, waterbirds distributed exclusively inland are relatively less concerned in China. This study indicated that the inland waterbirds exhibited similar proportion of population decline to that of waterbirds along the coasts, potentially highlighting a crisis for inland wetland ecosystems in China. Some studies have exhibited diverse threats to waterbirds inland. For example, damming along rivers have changed hydrological condition of both river and lakes, aquaculture in lakes have caused a decrease of vegetable food for waterbirds, and illegal hunting is not uncommon in lakes (see review of Wang et al. 2017). Moreover, the similar proportion of population decline between the migratory and resident species (both nearly one third population declined, higher than the global average of 23%) suggests that migratory birds suffered serious threats during their life history periods in China, as those resident birds that stay in China during their entire life history.
Threatened species
A total of 38 species (14.6% of the total) have been listed as threatened species, including 6 species (2.4%) being listed as Critically Endangered, 16 species (6.4%) Endangered, and 16 species Vulnerable (6.4%). Another 27 species (10.8%) were listed as Near Threatened (Table 2). In addition, 54 species (21.5%) were not assessed due to data deficiency or their marginal distribution in China. The threatened species were mainly in the Orders of Gruiformes (10 species), Charadriiformes (10 species), Anseriformes (8 species), and Pelecaniformes (8 species). The highest proportion of threatened species was in the Order of Ciconiiformes (40.0%) (Table 3). Although the percentage of threatened waterbird species in China (15.1% of the total) was slightly lower than that the global level (18.8%) (Wetland International 2012), the percentage of non-assessed species in China (21.5%) was much higher than that globally (0.4%).
Table
2.
Comparison on the threatened level of waterbirds in China and in the world
Category
In China
In the world
Number of species
Percentage (%)
Number of species
Percentage (%)
Critically Endangered
6
2.4
28
3.4
Endangered
16
6.4
52
6.3
Vulnerable
16
6.4
76
9.1
Near Threatened
27
10.8
71
8.5
Least Concern
132
52.6
602
72.4
Data Deficient
54
21.5
3
0.4
Total
251
100.0
832
100.0
Data are based on the IUCN criteria of threatened species. The threatened level in the world referred to the IUCN (2012). Among the total 260 waterbird species recorded in China, nine species were firstly recorded in China in recent years. They were listed in the checklists of Zheng (2017) while were not assessed in Jiang et al. (2016). These species include: Ardeola grayii, Ciconia episcopus, Branta hutchinsii, Rallus aquaticus, Vanellus leucurus, Calidris fuscicollis, Ardeola speciose, Anser serrirostris, and Anas poecilorhyncha
Table
3.
Number of threatened waterbird species in China in each order
Order
CR
EN
VU
NT
LC
DD
Total
Gaviiformes
0
0
0
0
2
2
4
Podicipediformes
0
0
0
2
3
0
5
Pelecaniformes
1
6
1
3
15
7
33
Suliformes
0
0
0
1
3
1
5
Ciconiiformes
0
1
1
0
1
2
5
Phoenicopteriformes
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
Anseriformes
2
3
3
8
22
13
51
Gruiformes
1
3
6
2
12
3
27
Charadriiformes
2
3
5
11
74
25
120
Total
6
16
16
27
132
54
251
Nine species of new distribution records in China were not assessed in recent years CR Critically Endangered, EN Endangered, VU Vulnerable, NT Near Threatened, LC Least Concern, DD Data Deficient
Among the 38 threatened waterbirds, 21 species (55.3%) exhibited declining trends, 2 species (5.3%) (Crested Ibis and Black-faced Spoonbill) tended to increase, and 7 species (18.4%) remained stable. There were 8 species (21.1%) with unknown population trends (Fig. 1). Although some species did not exhibit population decline, they were assessed as threatened species because of their small population number or narrow distributional range. For example, the population of the Critically Endangered Chinese Crested Tern (Thalasseus bernsteini), with an unknown population trend, was estimated to be less than 50 birds (Chen et al. 2015). Although both the Endangered Crested Ibis and the Endangered Black-faced Spoonbill showed population increase in recent years, the population of Crested Ibis is still less than 2000 birds (Wang et al. 2014) and the population of Black-faced Spoonbill is less than 3000 birds (Sung et al. 2018). Moreover, the population of the Critically Endangered Siberian Crane (Grus leucogeranus) kept stable at around 3000‒4000 birds in recent years, with 99% of the total population overwintering in Poyang Lake. Due to the plans of dam construction between Poyang Lake and the Yangtze River proposed by the local government, potentially dramatic changes of hydrology and vegetation in Poyang Lake would pose tremendous threats to the Siberian Crane (Wang et al. 2017).
Figure
1.
Population trends and threatened levels of waterbirds in China. CR Critically Endangered, EN Endangered, VU Vulnerable, NT Near Threatened, LC Least Concern, DD Data Deficient. Nine species of new distributional records in China in recent years were not included
Of the 38 threatened species in China, 33 species are migratory and 5 resident species. There was no significant difference in population trends between migratory and resident species (Fisher's exact test, p=0.40) (Additional file 1: Table S3). Moreover, seven threatened species distribute exclusively inland, nine exclusively on the coasts, and 22 both inland and on coasts. There was no significant difference in population trends among their distributions (Fisher's exact test, p=0.90) (Additional file 1: Table S4).
Threats to waterbirds
Waterbirds in China face various threats from both direct and indirect human activities, such as habitat loss, human disturbance, pollution, and illegal hunting (Table 4). Most waterbird species suffer multiple types of threats (Table 5). Habitat loss is the most common threat to waterbirds, affecting 32 of the 38 threatened species (84.2%) (Table 4). Many studies have indicated that the area of wetlands in China has dramatically decreased over the past half a century due to large-scale reclamation of both coastal and inland wetlands. It is estimated that China's wetlands have decreased by a total of 9.9 million hectares (21.6%) during the second half of the twentieth century (An et al. 2007). According to the national surveys on wetland resources, the total area of wetlands in China decreased by 3.4 million hectares (8.8% of the total) in 2003‒2013. Coastal wetlands suffered more loss than inland wetlands, with 1.36 million hectares (22.9% of the total) of coastal wetlands being lost in the decade (The State Forestry Administration 2015). Coastal wetlands in the Yellow Sea suffered the most serious loss: More than half of the coastal wetlands have been lost over the past 50 years (Murray and Fuller 2015). Many studies have indicated that dramatic loss of wetland habitats in the Yellow Sea is the major cause for the rapid population decline of migratory shorebirds along the East Asian-Australasian flyway, which rely on the Yellow Sea coasts as critial stopover habitats (Melville et al. 2016; Piersma et al. 2017; Studds et al. 2017).
Table
4.
Threats to the threatened waterbirds (38 species totally) in China
Table
5.
The threatened and near threatened waterbirds in China
English name
Scientific name
Population trend
Level at the national key protected wildlife
Threatened level in China
Threatened level of the world
Threats
Distribution region
Residence
Red-necked Grebe
Podiceps grisegena
Unk
Ⅱ
NT
LC
Unk
Both
Migrant
Horned Grebe
Podiceps auritus
Unk
Ⅱ
NT
LC
2, 4, 8, 7
Both
Migrant
Great White Pelican
Pelecanus onocrotalus
Unk
Ⅱ
EN
LC
1, 2, 4, 6
Inland
Migrant
Spot-billed Pelican
Pelecanus philippensis
Dec
Ⅱ
EN
NT
1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Both
Migrant
Dalmatian Pelican
Pelecanus crispus
Dec
Ⅱ
EN
VU
2, 3, 4
Both
Migrant
Pelagic Cornorant
Phalacrocorax pelagicus
Sta
Ⅱ
NT
LC
Unk
Coast
Migrant
Chinese Egret
Egretta eulophotes
Sta
Ⅱ
VU
VU
1, 2, 3, 4
Coast
Migrant
White-eared Night Heron
Gorsachius magnificus
Dec
Ⅱ
EN
EN
1, 2, 3, 5
Both
Resident
Malaysian Night Heron
Gorsachius melanolophus
Unk
NT
LC
Unk
Both
Resident
Little Bittern
Ixobrychus minutus
Unk
Ⅱ
NT
LC
Unk
Inland
Migrant
Black Stork
Ciconia nigra
Unk
Ⅰ
VU
LC
1, 2, 4
Both
Migrant
Oriental Stork
Ciconia boyciana
Dec
Ⅰ
EN
EN
1, 2, 3, 4
Both
Migrant
Black-headed Ibis
Threskiornis melanocephalus
Dec
Ⅱ
CR
NT
2, 3, 4
Both
Migrant
Crested Ibis
Nipponia nippon
Inc
Ⅰ
EN
EN
1, 2, 3, 4, 9
Inland
Resident
White Spoonbill
Platalea leucorodia
Dec
Ⅱ
NT
LC
1, 2, 4, 6
Both
Migrant
Black-faced Spoonbill
Platalea minor
Inc
Ⅱ
EN
EN
1, 2, 3, 4, 6
Coast
Migrant
Lesser Whistling Duck
Dendrocygna javanica
Dec
VU
LC
Unk
Both
Migrant
Mute Swan
Cygnus olor
Unk
Ⅱ
NT
LC
2, 3, 4, 6, 7
Both
Migrant
Whooper Swan
Cygnus cygnus
Unk
Ⅱ
NT
LC
1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7
Both
Migrant
Tundra Swan
Cygnus columbianus
Unk
Ⅱ
NT
LC
1, 2, 4, 6
Both
Migrant
Swan Goose
Anser cygnoid
Dec
VU
VU
1, 2, 3, 6, 7
Both
Migrant
Lesser White-fronted Goose
Anser erythropus
Sta
VU
VU
1, 3
Both
Migrant
Cotton Pygmy-goose
Nettapus coromandelianus
Unk
EN
LC
Unk
Both
Migrant
Mandarin Duck
Aix galericulata
Dec
Ⅱ
NT
LC
1
Both
Migrant
Falcated Duck
Mareca falcata
Dec
NT
NT
3
Both
Migrant
Baikal Teal
Sibirionetta formosa
Inc
NT
LC
1, 3, 4, 6
Both
Migrant
Baer's Pochard
Aythya baeri
Dec
CR
CR
1, 2, 3
Both
Migrant
Ferruginous Duck
Aythya nyroca
Dec
NT
NT
1, 3, 4, 8
Inland
Migrant
Long-tailed Duck
Clangula hyemalis
Unk
EN
VU
1, 3, 4, 6
Both
Migrant
Velvet Scoter
Melanitta fusca
Unk
NT
LC
2, 3, 4
Both
Migrant
Scaly-sided Merganser
Mergus squamatus
Dec
Ⅰ
EN
EN
1, 2, 3, 4, 9
Both
Migrant
White-headed Duck
Oxyura leucocephala
Dec
CR
EN
1, 2, 3
Inland
Migrant
Siberian Crane
Leucogeranus leucogeranus
Sta
Ⅰ
CR
CR
1, 2, 3, 8
Both
Migrant
White-naped Crane
Antigone vipio
Sta
Ⅱ
EN
VU
1, 2, 3, 4, 7
Both
Migrant
Common Crane
Grus grus
Dec
Ⅱ
NT
LC
1, 3, 4
Both
Migrant
Hooded Crane
Grus monacha
Sta
Ⅰ
EN
VU
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9
Both
Migrant
Black-necked Crane
Grus nigricollis
Sta
Ⅰ
VU
VU
1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8
Inland
Migrant
Red-crowned Crane
Grus japonensis
Dec
Ⅰ
EN
EN
1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9
Both
Migrant
Swinhoe's Rail
Coturnicops exquisitus
Dec
Ⅱ
VU
VU
1, 2, 3, 4
Both
Migrant
Slaty-legged Crake
Rallina eurizonoides
Unk
VU
LC
Unk
Coast
Resident
Corncrake
Crex crex
Sta
Ⅱ
VU
LC
1, 2
Inland
Migrant
Ruddy-breasted Crake
Zapornia fusca
Unk
NT
LC
Unk
Both
Resident
Band-bellied Crake
Zapornia paykullii
Unk
VU
NT
1
Both
Migrant
Purple Swamphen
Porphyrio porphyrio
Unk
VU
LC
1, 4, 5, 6
Both
Resident
Pheasant-tailed Jacana
Hydrophasianus chirurgus
Dec
NT
LC
Unk
Both
Migrant
Ibisbill
Ibidorhyncha struthersii
Inc
NT
LC
2, 4, 8
Both
Resident
River Lapwing
Vanellus duvaucelii
Unk
NT
NT
Unk
Both
Resident
Long-billed Ringed Plover
Charadrius placidus
Dec
NT
LC
Unk
Both
Migrant
Wood Snipe
Gallinago nemoricola
Dec
VU
VU
1, 2, 3
Inland
Migrant
Asian Dowitcher
Limnodromus semipalmatus
Dec
NT
NT
1, 2, 3, 4
Both
Migrant
Bar-tailed Godwit
Limosa lapponica
Dec
NT
LC
1
Coast
Migrant
Little Curlew
Numenius minutus
Unk
Ⅱ
NT
LC
1, 2, 4
Both
Migrant
Eurasian Curlew
Numenius arquata
Unk
NT
NT
1, 3, 4, 6
Both
Migrant
Far Eastern Curlew
Numenius madagascariensis
Dec
VU
VU
1
Both
Migrant
Nordmann's Greenshank
Tringa guttifer
Dec
Ⅱ
EN
EN
1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Coast
Migrant
Great Knot
Calidris tenuirostris
Dec
VU
VU
1, 2, 4, 5
Coast
Migrant
Red Knot
Calidris canutus
Dec
VU
LC
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8
Coast
Migrant
Spoon-billed Sandpiper
Calidris pygmaea
Dec
CR
CR
1, 5, 8
Coast
Migrant
Saunders's Gull
Saundersilarus saundersi
Dec
VU
VU
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7
Coast
Migrant
Relict Gull
Larus relictus
Dec
Ⅰ
EN
VU
1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8
Both
Migrant
Little Gull
Hydrocoloeus minutus
Sta
Ⅱ
NT
LC
2, 4
Both
Migrant
Chinese Crested Tern
Thalasseus bernsteini
Unk
CR
CR
2, 3, 4, 7
Coast
Migrant
Greater Crested Tern
Thalasseus bergii
Sta
NT
LC
2, 3, 4
Coast
Migrant
River Tern
Sterna aurantia
Dec
Ⅱ
NT
NT
2
Inland
Resident
Black-bellied Tern
Sterna acuticauda
Dec
EN
EN
1, 3
Inland
Resident
Population trends include: declining (Dec), increasing (Inc), stable (Sta), and unknown (Unk). The National key protected wildlife include two levels, the first (Ⅰ) and the second (Ⅱ) level. Threats to waterbirds include: (1) habitat loss; (2) human disturbance; (3) hunting; (4) pollution; (5) biology invasion; (6) disease; (7) natural disaster; (8) climate change; (9) genetic diversity loss. Distribution regions were classified as exclusively coastal, exclusively inland, and both inland and coastal region. Residence was classified as migrant and resident The threatened level in the world referred to the IUCN (2012) to match the threatened level in China (Jiang et al. 2016). CR Critically Endangered, EN Endangered, VU Vulnerable, NT Near Threatened, LC Least Concern
Human disturbance is another major threat to waterbirds in China, affecting 73.7% of the threatened species (27 of 38, Table 4). Human activities have strong interactions with waterbirds. In the nonbreeding and migration season, many herbivorous birds, such as cranes, geese, and ducks, forage for crops in farmland. Some piscivorous and benthivorous birds, such as herons, storks, spoonbills, and shorebirds, forage for aquatic products in aquaculture areas. These waterbirds might affect economic income of local people and thus are frequently driven off (Yu et al. 2017). In the coastal region, fishnets on the mudflats not only impacted on feeding activities of waterbirds, but also cause some waterbirds mortality through drowning during high tide due to entanglement in the nets (Crighton 2016).
In recent years, with the continuous expansion of land exploitation, human activities in some regions (including highways, channels, ports, industrial parks, and tourist areas) are close to natural habitats of waterbirds. Waterbirds are disturbed in various ways, such as reduction of foraging time, increase of vigilance behavior, and frequently being flushed (Wang et al. 2011). In addition, the number of wildlife photographers rapidly increased in China over the past decades. To get better view of birds, some photographers approach too close to birds and even interfere with nests. As a consequence, waterbirds that are susceptible to human disturbance are forced to abandon original habitats. Some breeding waterbirds abandon their nests, resulting in breeding failure (Luo et al. 2012; Li et al. 2017).
More than 60% of threatened waterbirds are affected by environmental pollution. Discharge of pollutants is the major environmental issue in China. Wetlands receive pollutants from diverse industrial and agricultural production activities (Hu et al. 2005; Sun et al. 2007; Zhi et al. 2015). Diverse heavy metal and persistent organic pollutants enter the body of waterbirds through direct contact and food chains. Pollutants accumulate in the body and adversely affect the condition of waterbirds, such as producing eggs with thin shells, decline of nest hatching success, and deformity of chicks (Xi et al. 2009). Moreover, heavy use of agrichemicals and pesticides causes decline of both invertebrates and small vertebrates, resulting in food shortage for insectivorous and carnivorous birds (Hallmann et al. 2014). However, it is still lack of quantitative study on the impacts of pollutants on waterbirds in China.
Traditionally, bird hunting has been a method of getting food and economic income by people in underdeveloped regions. It is estimated that in the late 1980s, about 50% of wintering ducks and geese were killed each year in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River (Wang et al. 2017). Since the 1990s, with the implementation of the Wild Animal Protection Law, bird hunting became illegal in China. However, poaching still frequently occurs. For example, in the lakes in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, poaching geese and ducks using poisoned baits often occurs in winter. This may be the main cause for the population decline of the critically endangered Baer's Pochard (Aythya baeri) and the vulnerable Lesser White-fronted Goose (Anser erythropus) (Ma et al. 2012). In November 2012, a total of 21 endangered Oriental Storks (Ciconia boyciana) died from eating poisoned baits spread by poachers in Tianjin (Zeng 2012). In the coastal regions, some poachers sell eggs of gulls and terns in the market during breeding season, which is probably the major cause for the near extinction of the critically endangered Chinese Crested Tern (Chen et al. 2015).
Waterbirds are also affected by biological invasion. Invasive alien species have serious impacts on native species, such as predation of birds and eggs, alternation of habitat structure, decline of habitat quality and food availability (Gan et al. 2007). All these have direct or indirect impacts on waterbirds. Since the 1990s, alien Smooth Cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) has spread rapidly in coastal wetlands in China through artificial plantation and natural expansion. The Smooth Cordgrass has out-competed native plants, occupied saltmarsh and mudflat, and altered the structure and composition of biological communities in the invaded region. This has resulted in a significant decrease in waterbird diversity (Gan et al. 2009). The exotic Red Swamp Crawfish (Procambarus clarkii) was cultivated as an economic aquatic product in many regions in China. Currently it is common in many inland wetlands. The crawfish is omnivorous and has a high reproduction rate. The spread of crawfish has largely reduced local benthic diversity and decreased food for waterbirds (Jiang et al. 2007). Although many invasive species in wetlands have been reported, the impacts of most exotic species on waterbirds remain largely unknown.
Like anywhere else in the world, climate change has also affected waterbirds in China. On the one hand, sea-level rise caused by global warming decreased the area of coastal wetlands, which provides critical habitats for many waterbirds, especially providing refueling habitats for millions of migratory shorebirds along the East Asian-Australasian flyway. It is estimated that that sea-level rise would reduce 23-40% of intertidal habitat, causing population decline of 72% among ten long-distance migratory shorebirds (Iwamura et al. 2013). On the other hand, because different biological groups have various responses to climate change, climate change would affect the temporal and spatial linkage between waterbirds and their biological and abiotic environments, such as mismatches between breeding period and the peak of food (Both and Visser 2001), causing fitness decline. Climate change can also increase the frequency of extreme weather events such as droughts and floods, which adversely affect waterbird populations (Galbraith et al. 2002; Zhang et al. 2011).
Natural disasters has threatened some waterbird populations. For example, summer typhoons in the coastal areas often cause breeding failure of the Chinese Crested Terns (Chen et al. 2015). In 1998, flooding in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River raised water levels in Dongting and Poyang Lake. It is difficult for some waterbirds to access their food of submerged plants in deep water, causing decrease of waterbird diversity in the region (Wang et al. 2017). Since 2006, long-term drought in Taolimiao-Alashan Nur of Inner Mongolia has largely reduced the area of nest sites for Relict Gull (Larus relictus), causing decline of breeding success (He and Ren 2011). Drought at Dalai Lake in Inner Mongolia, a breeding site for waterbirds, led to a dramatic population decline of the Red-crowned Crane (Grus japonensis), the White-naped Crane (Antigone vipio), and the Mute Swan (Cygnus olor) (Tian et al. 2016). In 2001, fire at Zhalong Nature Reserve destroyed 18% of the total area of breeding sites for the red-crowned cranes, causing decrease of breeding success (Tian et al. 2004). Although habitats can be gradually restored after natural disasters, the impact of natural disasters on bird populations might last for long periods. If combined with other adverse effects, natural disasters may cause more serious consequences, such as extinction of small populations.
The outbreak of diseases can cause rapid decline of waterbird population. For example, in 2002, a total of 73 Black-faced Spoonbills overwintering in Taiwan died of Clostridium botulinum (Yu and Swennen 2004). In 2005, the break of H5N1 influenza virus caused 10% of the total Bar-headed Goose (Anser indicus) to die at Qinghai Lake (Liu et al. 2005). Many waterbirds concentrate in large flocks or in colonies in breeding, migration stopover, and nonbreeding period, further increasing the probability of disease transmission and outbreak (Chen et al. 2006; Zhang et al. 2011).
Most threatened birds have a small population with relatively low genetic diversity. On the one hand, the probability of inbreeding is high in such small populations, which decreases the viability of nestlings and increases the probability of breeding failure (Chen and He 2011). For example, the records of thinning egg shells, chick malformations, and mortality rates was relatively high in the Crested Ibis, which might be because the Crested Ibises originated from a small population with low genetic diversity (Xi et al. 2009). On the other hand, low genetic diversity may decrease the adaptability of birds to environmental changes and thus increase the risk of extinction in a changing environment (Zhang et al. 2004; Zhang and Zhou 2012).
Besides these threats to waterbirds and their habitats listed above, the management policy also affects population dynamics of waterbirds. On the aspect of habitat management, although wetlands provide essential ecological services for human being, they have been considered as unused lands, and thus wetland exploitation has been encouraged, for long term in China. Many hydraulic engineering projects, such as damming construction along rivers and seawall construction along coasts, have been implemented over the past several decades, with taking little account of the integrated values of natural wetlands, nor the ecosystem services they provide. To meet the target of no-net-loss of arable land, large area of wetlands has been enclosed and changed to farmland to compensate their loss along with rapid economic development. Moreover, wetlands are under the jurisdictions of different agencies, with often conflicting mandates symbolizes the difficulties for conservation. All these have caused dramatic loss of wetlands, in both quality and area, which adversely affected waterbirds that depend on wetland habitats (An et al. 2007; Ma et al. 2014).
In recent years, with increasing understanding of the importance of wetlands, wetland conservation has obtained increasing attention. Many legislations, regulations, and guidance emphasize wetland conservation. For example, the Law of Land Administration that revised in 2004 has changed the articles from encouraging wetland exploitation in the earlier version to that "it is forbidden to reclaiming farmland from lakes and to occupy river beach". The Regulations for the Conservation and Management of Wetlands issued in 2013 proposed that "Prohibit reclamation, landfill, or draining of wetlands". In February 2018, the draft of Measures for Protection and Management of Coastal Wetlands was announced by the State Oceanic Administration, announcing that commercial development of coastal wetlands will be prohibited (Stokstad 2018). All these suggest changes in the management of wetland habitats for waterbirds. However, it generally takes a long stage for the recovery of waterbird populations, the effectiveness of such changes on waterbird conservation remains to be seen.
Recommendations for waterbird conservation
Multiple threats have caused waterbirds in China to be one of the most threatened wildlife groups. Because nearly half of the populations were still unknown for their trends, the population declines of waterbirds in China might be more serious than we have known. We propose comprehensive measures for waterbird conservation as follows:
Strengthen wetland conservation and restoration of degraded wetlands to provide high quality habitats for waterbirds
Habitat conservation is the basis of species conservation. In view of the severe situation of rapid wetland loss and degradation in China, wetland conservation is the priority for waterbird conservation. Because wetland reclamation is the main cause of wetland loss, we suggest that all the wetland reclamation projects should be strictly assessed for their impacts on waterbirds and their habitats. Wetland reclamation should be forbidden in key habitats for waterbirds. Meanwhile key habitats for waterbirds should be designated as nature reserves, Ramsar sites, or other types of protected areas. At present, local governments in China are designing the "ecological red-line" for conservation (Zhang et al. 2017). This will improve the conservation of natural wetlands and provide suitable habitats for waterbirds. In January 2017, the newly revised Wild Animal Protection Law came into effect. Compared with the previous version, the revision put the conservation of habitats for wildlife into an important position (Ma 2017). However, although some regulations for wetland conservation have been issued at both national and local levels, it is still lack of special law for wetland management. Formulation of wetland management law will provide further legal support for protection and sustainable use of wetlands.
For degraded wetlands, targeted measures are required to restore their function, such as controlling the discharge of pollutants, eradicating invasive and regaining native species, and improving the long-term hydrological condition of wetlands. In 2012, constructing "beautiful China" and "ecological civilization" was proposed as national strategies at the Eighteenth National Congress of the Communist Party of China. In 2017, the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China further proposed to enhance ecosystem conservation, including to strengthen wetland restoration (Xi 2017). This provides policy support for restoration of degraded wetlands. In recent years, both the central and local governments provide special funding to support wetland restoration (The State Forestry Administration 2015). Wetland restoration has been conducted in many regions, such as the projects of "returning farmland to lake" in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River (Sun et al. 2015), the project in the Yellow River Delta to establish hydrological linkage among various wetland components (Li et al. 2011), and the project of eradicating invasive Smooth Cordgrass using engineering or non-toxic herbicide measures in the Yangtze and Minjiang estuary (Xu 2010; Ma 2017). All these projects have improved wetland quality and increased waterbird diversity. Currently, there is still a lack of integrated technical support in wetland restoration. Development of guidelines for wetland restoration, which should be associated with specific wetland types, can be helpful for sharing experience of successful practice. A successful wetland management will raise wetland quality and improve their supports for waterbirds.
Enhance public awareness to improve waterbird conservation
Since the late 1990s, many locally-based non-government organizations focusing on birdwatching have been established in China. This promoted the increase of public awareness in bird conservation. Moreover, some birdwatching societies have exerted their influence to promote the decision making of governments in conservation (Ma et al. 2013). However, the modern concept of natural conservation has only a short history in China. There is still a lot of room for improvement of public awareness. As a consequence, public education should be further strengthened, especially targeted at decision-makers, young people, and people in underdeveloped regions. Through increased advocacy, direct actions, effective campaigns, pressure on governments, and targeted public-government partnerships on bird conservation, the increased public awareness will largely improve conservation.
Improve the enforcement of wildlife protection law and crack down on illegal bird hunting
The Wild Animal Protection Law provides the legal basis for punishing illegal hunting, with emphasizing protection of national key protected animals. However, the checklist of the national key protected animals was formulated in 1989 and has not been updated (except for slight adjustments in 1993 and 2003) since then. Many threatened waterbirds, such as the critically endangered Spoon-billed Sandpiper (Calidris pygmaea) and Baer's Pochard, are not included in the checklist due to lack of data when the law was formulated (Table 5). We recommend that the checklist of the national key protected animals should be updated regularly (e.g., every five years) based on the population dynamics, so these threatened birds can be protected by law. Moreover, the enforcement of the Wildlife Protection Law should be strengthened to make sure that illegal acts receive due punishment.
Conduct long-term waterbird surveys to clarify population dynamics
The population trends collected in the paper come from the database of Wetlands International (2012), in which most data were in the 2000s. Due to the rapid changes of waterbirds and their habitats in China, the population trends in the 2000s might be different from that in recent years for some species. For example, the population trend of Oriental Stork (Ciconia boyciana) was designated to "decline" according to the data between 1995 and 2005 (Wetland International 2012). However, with expanding breeding region and increasing breeding numbers, the population of Oriental Stork might have increased in recent years (Duan et al. 2015). Moreover, most waterbird species lack long-term surveys, some even lack of basis ecological data, making it difficult to assess population trends in China.
In recent years, the Ministry of Environmental Protection, the State Administration of Forestry, and many local wildlife management agencies have organized regional waterbird surveys (The State Forestry Administration 2015). The public also is active in waterbird surveys. Since 2005, birdwatchers in the coastal regions have launched the China Coastal Waterbird Census. By monthly waterbird surveys, these surveys have provided information about the distribution, population status, and key habitats of waterbirds, promoting waterbird conservation in coastal region (Bai et al. 2015). We suggest that systematic and long-term waterbird surveys should be conducted to fill knowledge gaps, with close cooperation between government agencies and the public. With increasing numbers of birdwatchers, the public will play more and more important role in bird surveys in China. Those third party data from "citizen science" contribute not only to clarifying population dynamics of waterbirds, but also to providing references in environmental impact assessment and making of regulations (Ma et al. 2013; Zeng et al. 2018). Furthermore, an integrated waterbird database including both waterbirds and habitat information, which should be shared by everyone in a transparent way, is required to provide basic data for analyzing waterbird population trends and for supporting the formulation of conservation measures.
Restore populations of highly-threatened species through artificial intervention to reduce extinction risk
For some Critically Endangered and Endangered species with small populations, it is crucial to increase their populations by artificial interventions. The population restoration of Crested Ibis is a representative case. One the one hand, by controlling natural enemies during the breeding period, reproductive success of the Ibises was largely increased. On the other hand, based on successful captive breeding, captive populations have been reintroduced into the field, augmenting the wild population and increasing genetic diversity (Li et al. 2018). After more than 30 years of efforts, the threatened level of Ibises has been down listed from Critically Endangered to Endangered (Wang et al. 2014). In recent years, artificial intervention measures have also been conducted for population restoration of the Spoon-billed Sandpiper and the Chinese Crested Tern (Chen et al. 2014; Peng et al. 2017). Some threatened waterbirds, such as cranes and storks, have successfully bred in many zoos with large captive populations, which can provide the basis for increasing natural population by reintroduction provided suitable habitat still exits. It should be emphasized that on the background of dramatic habitat loss in China over the past several decades, habitat conservation is the priority in species conservation. Especially for nature reserves, habitat conservation is always the first task, captive breeding cannot be used as an excuse.
Promote international and regional exchange and cooperation to share information and experience about waterbird conservation
Most waterbirds in China are migrants. Three of the nine global flyways, namely the East Asian-Australasian Flyway, Central Pacific Flyway, and the Central Asian Flyway, pass through China. Therefore, waterbird conservation in China is closely related to waterbird conservation along the flyways. The Chinese government has joined several international and regional waterbird conservation treaties, such as the Ramsar Convention and the East Asian-Australasian Flyway Partnership. Some international conservation organizations, such as the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), Wetland International, Paulson Institute, and the International Crane Foundation (ICF), have set up their offices in China and launched many waterbird conservation programs. BirdLife International, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB), and many other organizations are also active in supporting China's waterbird conservation. In the future, enhancing international and regional exchange and cooperation, sharing information of and experience in waterbirds conservation among countries and organizations will promote waterbird conservation in China. In view of the critical role of China in supporting diverse waterbirds, recognizing international obligations under the treaties and agreements to address population decline of waterbirds will contribute to waterbird conservation along the flyways.
Additional fle
Additional fle 1:Table S1. Population trends of migratory and resident waterbird species in China. Table S2. Population trends of waterbird species distributed exclusively on coast, inland, and both in China. Table S3. Population trends of threatened waterbird species in China. Data were classifed according to residence. Table S4. Population trends of threatened waterbird species distributed exclusively on coast, inland, and both in China.
Authors' contributions
ZM and XW designed the study, XW collected and analyzed the data, XW and ZM wrote the paper with contribution from FK and KT. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgements
We thank MJ Ke, SD Zhang, WH Cao, J Fan, and CC Feng for their help on collecting data and helpful comments on an earlier version.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Aengwanich W, Boonsorn T, Srikot P. Intervention to improve biosecurity systems of poultry production clusters (PPCs) in Thailand. Agriculture. 2014;4:231–8.
Alexander DJ. An overview of the epidemiology of avian influenza. Vaccine. 2007;25:5637–44.
Allan C, Stankey GH. Adaptive environmental management: a practitioner's guide. Dordrecht: Springer; 2009.
Amano TT, Szekely B, Sandel S, Nagy T, Mundkur T, Langendoen T, Blanco D, Soykan CU, Sutherland WJ. Succesful conservation of global waterbird populations depends on effective governance. Nature. 2017;2018(553):199–202.
Brazil M. Birds of East Asia: Eastern China, Taiwan, Korea, Japan, and Eastern Russia. London: A&C Black; 2009.
Brotons L, Thuiller W, Araujo MB, Hirzel AH. Presence-absence versus presence-only modelling methods for predicting bird habitat suitability. Ecography. 2004;27:437–48.
Cao L, Barter M, Lei G. New Anatidae population estimates for eastern China: implications for current flyway estimates. Biol Conserv. 2008;141:2301–9.
Cao L, Zhang Y, Barter M, Lei G. Anatidae in eastern China during the non-breeding season: geographical distributions and protection status. Biol Conserv. 2010;143:650–9.
China Anatidae Network. Annual anatidae report to the State Forestry Administration. (2012);1–6 (in Chinese).
Cong P, Cao L, Fox AD, Barter M, Rees EC, Jiang Y, Ji W, Zhu W, Song G. Changes in tundra swan Cygnus columbianus bewickii distribution and abundance in the Yangtze River floodplain. Bird Conserv Int. 2011;21:260–5.
Cui P, Wu Y, Ding H, Wu J, Cao M, Chen L, Chen B, Lu X, Xu H. Stauts of wintering waterbirds at selected locations in China. Waterbirds. 2014;37:402–9.
Dai S, Duole F, Bing X. Monitoring potential geographic distribution of four wild bird species in China. Environ Earth Sci. 2016;75:790.
Dronova I, Beissinger SR, Burnham JW, Gong P. Landscape-level associations of wintering waterbird diversity and abundance from remotely sensed wetland characteristics of Poyang Lake. Remote Sens. 2016;8:462.
Franklin J, Miller JA. Mapping species distributions: spatial inference and prediction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
Gibbens N. Declaration of an avian influenza prevention zone. London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; 2017.
Gilbert M, Pfeiffer DU. Risk factor modelling of the spatio-temporal patterns of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAIV) H5N1: a review. Spat Spat Temp Epidemiol. 2012;3:173–83.
Gillson L, Dawson TP, Jack S, McGeoch MA. Accomodating climate change contingencies in conservation strategy. Trends Ecol Evol. 2013;28:135–42.
Gottschalk TK, Huettmann F, Ehlers M. Thirty years of analysing and modelling avian habitat relationships using satellite imagery data: a review. Int J Remote Sens. 2005;26:2631–56.
Graham CH, Hijmans RJ. A comparison of methods for mapping species ranges and species richness. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2006;16:578–87.
Graham MH. Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology. 2003;84:2809–15.
Grenyer R, Orme CDL, Jackson SF, Thomas GH, Davies RG, Davies TJ, Jones KE, Olson VA, Ridgely RS, Rasmussen PC, Ding TS, Bennett PM, Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ, Gittleman JL, Owens IPF. Global distribution and conservation of rare and threatened vertebrates. Nature. 2006;444:93–6.
Guillera-Arroita G, Lahoz-Monfort JJ, Elith J, Gordon A, Kujala H, Lentini PE, McCarthy MA, Tingley R, Wintle BA. Is my species distribution model fit for purpose? Matching data and models to applications. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2015;24:276–92.
Guisan A, Tingley R, Baumgartner JB, Naujokaitis-Lewis I, Sutcliffe PR, Tulloch AIT, Regan TJ, Brotons L, McDonald-Madden E, Mantyka-Pringle C, Martin TG, Rhodes JR, Maggini R, Setterfield SA, Elith J, Schwartz MW, Wintle BA, Broennimann O, Austin M, Ferrier S, Kearney MR, Possingham HP, Buckley YM. Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions. Ecol Lett. 2013;16:1424–35.
Hernandez A, Graham CH, Master LL, Albert DL. The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography. 2006;29:773–85.
IUCN. The IUCN Red List of threatened species. Version 2015–3. 2017. . Accessed 5 Dec 2017.
Jewell CP, Kypraios T, Neal P, Roberts GO. Bayesian analysis for emerging infectious diseases. Bayesian Anal. 2009;4:465–96.
Keawcharoen J, van Riel D, van Amerongen G, Bestebroer T, Beyer WE, van Lavieren R, Osterhaus ADME, Fouchier RA, Kuiken T. Wild ducks as long-distance vectors of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (H5N1). Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:600–7.
Li ZWD, Bloem A, Delany S, Martakis G, Quintero JO. Status of waterbirds in Asia: results of the Asian Waterbird Census 1987–2007. Kuala Lumpur: Wetlands International; 2009.
Liu J, Liu M, Deng X, Zhuang D, Zhang Z, Luo D. The land use and land cover change database and its relative studies in China. J Geogr Sci. 2002;12:275–82.
Liu J, Xiao H, Lei F, Zhu Q, Qin K, Zhang XW, Zhang XL, Zhao D, Wang G, Feng Y, Ma J, Liu W, Wang J, Gao GF. Highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus infection in migratory birds. Science. 2005;309:1206.
Mackinnon J, Phillipps K. A field guide to the birds of China. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.; 2000.
Martin LJ, Blossey B, Ellis E. Mapping where ecologists work: biases in the global distribution of terrestrial ecological observations. Front Ecol Environ. 2012;10:195–201.
Merow C, Smith MJ, Edwards TC, Guisan A, McMahon S, Normand S, Thuiller W, Wuest R, Zimmermann N, Elith J. What do we gain from simplicity versus complexity in species distribution models? Ecography. 2014;37:1267–81.
Moriguchi S, Amano T, Ushiyama K. Creating a potential distribution map for greater white-fronted geese wintering in Japan. Ornithol Sci. 2013;12:117–25.
Muzaffar SB, Takekawa JY, Prosser DJ, Newman SH, Xiao X. Rice production systems and avian influenza: interactions between rice, poultry and wild birds. Waterbirds. 2010;33:219–30.
Ochoa-Quintero JM, Szabolcs N, Flink S. Use of species distribution modelling based on data from the African waterbird census to predict waterbird distributions in Africa and identify gaps in knowledge of distribution. In: Anselin A (ed) Bird Numbers 2010: Monitoring, indicators and targets. Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the European Bird Census Council, Caceres, Spain (partim). Bird Census News. 2010;23:29–40.
OIE. Update on highly pathogenic avian influenza in animals: Type H5 and H7. 2017. . Accessed 5 Dec 2017.
Prosser D, Cui P, Takekawa JY, Tang MJ, Hou YS, Collins BM, Yan BP, Hill NJ, Li TX, Li YD, Lei FM, Guo S, Xing Z, He YB, Zhou YC, Douglas DC, Perry WM, Newman SH. Wild bird migration across the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau: a transmission route for highly pathogenic H5N1. PLoS ONE. 2011. .
Prosser DJ, Hungerford LL, Erwin RM, Ottinger MA, Takekawa JY, Ellis EC. Mapping risk of avian influenza transmission at the interface of domestic poultry and wild birds. Front Public Health. 2013;28:1–11.
Root T. Atlas of wintering North American birds: an analysis of Christmas Bird Count Data. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1988.
Sauer JR, Fallon JE, Johnson R. Use of North American breeding bird survey data to estimate population change for bird conservation regions. J Wildl Manage. 2003;67:372–89.
Spackman E, Prosser DJ, Pantin-Jackwood MJ, Berlin AM, Stephens CB. The pathogenesis of Clade 2.3. 4.4 H5 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses in ruddy duck (Oxyura jamaicensis) and lesser scaup (Aythya affinis). J Wildl Dis. 2017;53:832–42.
Segurado P, Araujo MB. An evaluation of methods for modelling species distributions. J Biogeogr. 2004;31:1555–68.
Wetlands International. Asian waterbird census. 2017. . Accessed 28 May 2017.
Williamson L, Hudson M, O'Connell M, Davidson N, Young R, Amano T, Szekely T. Areas of high diversity for the world's inland-breeding waterbirds. Biodivers Conserv. 2013;22:1501–12.
Xia S, Yu X, Millington S, Liu Y, Jia Y, Wang L, Hou X, Jiang L. Identifying priority sites and gaps for the conservation of migratory waterbirds in China's coastal wetlands. Biol Conserv. 2016;210:72–82.
Xu W, Xiao Y, Zhang J, Yang W, Zhang L, Hull V, Wang Z, Zheng H, Liu J, Polasky S, Jiang L, Xiao Y, Shi X, Rao E, Lu F, Wang X, Daily GC, Ouyang Z. Strengthening protected areas for biodiversity and ecosystem services in China. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:1601–6.
Xu X, Subbarao K, Cox NJ, Guo Y. Genetic characterization of the pathogenic influenza A/Goose/Guangdonng/1/96 (H5N1) virus: similarity of its hemagglutinin gene to those of H5N1 viruses from the 1997 outbreaks in Hong Kong. Virology. 1999;261:15–9.
Yu H, Wang X, Cao L, Zhang L, Jia Q, Lee H, Xu Z, Liu G, Xu W, Hu B, Fox AD. Are declining populations of wild geese in China 'prisoners' of their natural habitats? Curr Biol. 2017;27:365–77.
Zeng Q, Zhang Y, Sun G, Duo H, Wen L, Lei G. Using species distribution model to estimate the wintering population size of the endangered scaly-sided merganser in China. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0117307.
Zhang G, Liu D, Jiang H, Zhang K, Zhao H, Kang A, Liang H, Qian F. Abundance and conservation of waterbirds breeding on the Changtang Plateau, Tibet autonomous region, China. Waterbirds. 2015a;38:19–29.
Zhang L, Wang X, Zhang J, Ouyang Z, Chan S, Crosby M, Watkins D, Martinez J, Su L, Yu Y, Szabo J, Cao L, Fox AD. Formulating a list of sites of waterbird conservation significance to contribute to China's ecological protection red line. Bird Conserv Int. 2017;27:153–66.
Zhang Y, Jia Q, Prins HHT, Cao L, de Boer WF. Effect of conservation efforts and ecological variables on waterbird population sizes in wetlands of the Yangtze river. Sci Rep. 2015b;5:17136. .
Gulzaman William, Zafeer Saqib, Abdul Qadir, et al. Modelling of Aythya nyroca habitat under climate change scenarios in Pakistan using MaxEnt approach. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 2024.
DOI:10.1080/00207233.2024.2389693
2.
Michael Allan Merchant, Michael J. Battaglia, Nancy French, et al. Species Abundance Modelling of Arctic-Boreal Zone Ducks Informed by Satellite Remote Sensing. Remote Sensing, 2024, 16(7): 1175.
DOI:10.3390/rs16071175
3.
Ziqi Li, Yuyu Wang, Yifei Jia, et al. Intra-annual compositions and diversity variations of waterbird communities in China. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2024, 54: e03151.
DOI:10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03151
4.
Xuetao Lu, Steven Saul, Chris Jenkins. Statistical methods for predicting the spatial abundance of reef fish species. Ecological Informatics, 2022, 69: 101624.
DOI:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101624
5.
Lan Wu, Yuyu Wang, Xunqiang Mo, et al. Shifted to the South, Shifted to the North, but No Expansion: Potential Suitable Habitat Distribution Shift and Conservation Gap of the Critically Endangered Baer’s Pochard (Aythya baeri). Remote Sensing, 2022, 14(9): 2171.
DOI:10.3390/rs14092171
6.
John M. Humphreys, Jennifer L. Murrow, Jeffery D. Sullivan, et al. Seasonal occurrence and abundance of dabbling ducks across the continental United States: Joint spatio‐temporal modelling for the GenusAnas. Diversity and Distributions, 2019, 25(9): 1497.
DOI:10.1111/ddi.12960
7.
Paul C. Cross, Diann J. Prosser, Andrew M. Ramey, et al. Confronting models with data: the challenges of estimating disease spillover. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2019, 374(1782): 20180435.
DOI:10.1098/rstb.2018.0435
8.
Jeffery D. Sullivan, John Y. Takekawa, Kyle A. Spragens, et al. Waterfowl Spring Migratory Behavior and Avian Influenza Transmission Risk in the Changing Landscape of the East Asian-Australasian Flyway. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 2018, 6
DOI:10.3389/fevo.2018.00206
Table
2.
Comparison on the threatened level of waterbirds in China and in the world
Category
In China
In the world
Number of species
Percentage (%)
Number of species
Percentage (%)
Critically Endangered
6
2.4
28
3.4
Endangered
16
6.4
52
6.3
Vulnerable
16
6.4
76
9.1
Near Threatened
27
10.8
71
8.5
Least Concern
132
52.6
602
72.4
Data Deficient
54
21.5
3
0.4
Total
251
100.0
832
100.0
Data are based on the IUCN criteria of threatened species. The threatened level in the world referred to the IUCN (2012). Among the total 260 waterbird species recorded in China, nine species were firstly recorded in China in recent years. They were listed in the checklists of Zheng (2017) while were not assessed in Jiang et al. (2016). These species include: Ardeola grayii, Ciconia episcopus, Branta hutchinsii, Rallus aquaticus, Vanellus leucurus, Calidris fuscicollis, Ardeola speciose, Anser serrirostris, and Anas poecilorhyncha
Table
3.
Number of threatened waterbird species in China in each order
Order
CR
EN
VU
NT
LC
DD
Total
Gaviiformes
0
0
0
0
2
2
4
Podicipediformes
0
0
0
2
3
0
5
Pelecaniformes
1
6
1
3
15
7
33
Suliformes
0
0
0
1
3
1
5
Ciconiiformes
0
1
1
0
1
2
5
Phoenicopteriformes
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
Anseriformes
2
3
3
8
22
13
51
Gruiformes
1
3
6
2
12
3
27
Charadriiformes
2
3
5
11
74
25
120
Total
6
16
16
27
132
54
251
Nine species of new distribution records in China were not assessed in recent years CR Critically Endangered, EN Endangered, VU Vulnerable, NT Near Threatened, LC Least Concern, DD Data Deficient
Table
5.
The threatened and near threatened waterbirds in China
English name
Scientific name
Population trend
Level at the national key protected wildlife
Threatened level in China
Threatened level of the world
Threats
Distribution region
Residence
Red-necked Grebe
Podiceps grisegena
Unk
Ⅱ
NT
LC
Unk
Both
Migrant
Horned Grebe
Podiceps auritus
Unk
Ⅱ
NT
LC
2, 4, 8, 7
Both
Migrant
Great White Pelican
Pelecanus onocrotalus
Unk
Ⅱ
EN
LC
1, 2, 4, 6
Inland
Migrant
Spot-billed Pelican
Pelecanus philippensis
Dec
Ⅱ
EN
NT
1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Both
Migrant
Dalmatian Pelican
Pelecanus crispus
Dec
Ⅱ
EN
VU
2, 3, 4
Both
Migrant
Pelagic Cornorant
Phalacrocorax pelagicus
Sta
Ⅱ
NT
LC
Unk
Coast
Migrant
Chinese Egret
Egretta eulophotes
Sta
Ⅱ
VU
VU
1, 2, 3, 4
Coast
Migrant
White-eared Night Heron
Gorsachius magnificus
Dec
Ⅱ
EN
EN
1, 2, 3, 5
Both
Resident
Malaysian Night Heron
Gorsachius melanolophus
Unk
NT
LC
Unk
Both
Resident
Little Bittern
Ixobrychus minutus
Unk
Ⅱ
NT
LC
Unk
Inland
Migrant
Black Stork
Ciconia nigra
Unk
Ⅰ
VU
LC
1, 2, 4
Both
Migrant
Oriental Stork
Ciconia boyciana
Dec
Ⅰ
EN
EN
1, 2, 3, 4
Both
Migrant
Black-headed Ibis
Threskiornis melanocephalus
Dec
Ⅱ
CR
NT
2, 3, 4
Both
Migrant
Crested Ibis
Nipponia nippon
Inc
Ⅰ
EN
EN
1, 2, 3, 4, 9
Inland
Resident
White Spoonbill
Platalea leucorodia
Dec
Ⅱ
NT
LC
1, 2, 4, 6
Both
Migrant
Black-faced Spoonbill
Platalea minor
Inc
Ⅱ
EN
EN
1, 2, 3, 4, 6
Coast
Migrant
Lesser Whistling Duck
Dendrocygna javanica
Dec
VU
LC
Unk
Both
Migrant
Mute Swan
Cygnus olor
Unk
Ⅱ
NT
LC
2, 3, 4, 6, 7
Both
Migrant
Whooper Swan
Cygnus cygnus
Unk
Ⅱ
NT
LC
1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7
Both
Migrant
Tundra Swan
Cygnus columbianus
Unk
Ⅱ
NT
LC
1, 2, 4, 6
Both
Migrant
Swan Goose
Anser cygnoid
Dec
VU
VU
1, 2, 3, 6, 7
Both
Migrant
Lesser White-fronted Goose
Anser erythropus
Sta
VU
VU
1, 3
Both
Migrant
Cotton Pygmy-goose
Nettapus coromandelianus
Unk
EN
LC
Unk
Both
Migrant
Mandarin Duck
Aix galericulata
Dec
Ⅱ
NT
LC
1
Both
Migrant
Falcated Duck
Mareca falcata
Dec
NT
NT
3
Both
Migrant
Baikal Teal
Sibirionetta formosa
Inc
NT
LC
1, 3, 4, 6
Both
Migrant
Baer's Pochard
Aythya baeri
Dec
CR
CR
1, 2, 3
Both
Migrant
Ferruginous Duck
Aythya nyroca
Dec
NT
NT
1, 3, 4, 8
Inland
Migrant
Long-tailed Duck
Clangula hyemalis
Unk
EN
VU
1, 3, 4, 6
Both
Migrant
Velvet Scoter
Melanitta fusca
Unk
NT
LC
2, 3, 4
Both
Migrant
Scaly-sided Merganser
Mergus squamatus
Dec
Ⅰ
EN
EN
1, 2, 3, 4, 9
Both
Migrant
White-headed Duck
Oxyura leucocephala
Dec
CR
EN
1, 2, 3
Inland
Migrant
Siberian Crane
Leucogeranus leucogeranus
Sta
Ⅰ
CR
CR
1, 2, 3, 8
Both
Migrant
White-naped Crane
Antigone vipio
Sta
Ⅱ
EN
VU
1, 2, 3, 4, 7
Both
Migrant
Common Crane
Grus grus
Dec
Ⅱ
NT
LC
1, 3, 4
Both
Migrant
Hooded Crane
Grus monacha
Sta
Ⅰ
EN
VU
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9
Both
Migrant
Black-necked Crane
Grus nigricollis
Sta
Ⅰ
VU
VU
1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8
Inland
Migrant
Red-crowned Crane
Grus japonensis
Dec
Ⅰ
EN
EN
1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9
Both
Migrant
Swinhoe's Rail
Coturnicops exquisitus
Dec
Ⅱ
VU
VU
1, 2, 3, 4
Both
Migrant
Slaty-legged Crake
Rallina eurizonoides
Unk
VU
LC
Unk
Coast
Resident
Corncrake
Crex crex
Sta
Ⅱ
VU
LC
1, 2
Inland
Migrant
Ruddy-breasted Crake
Zapornia fusca
Unk
NT
LC
Unk
Both
Resident
Band-bellied Crake
Zapornia paykullii
Unk
VU
NT
1
Both
Migrant
Purple Swamphen
Porphyrio porphyrio
Unk
VU
LC
1, 4, 5, 6
Both
Resident
Pheasant-tailed Jacana
Hydrophasianus chirurgus
Dec
NT
LC
Unk
Both
Migrant
Ibisbill
Ibidorhyncha struthersii
Inc
NT
LC
2, 4, 8
Both
Resident
River Lapwing
Vanellus duvaucelii
Unk
NT
NT
Unk
Both
Resident
Long-billed Ringed Plover
Charadrius placidus
Dec
NT
LC
Unk
Both
Migrant
Wood Snipe
Gallinago nemoricola
Dec
VU
VU
1, 2, 3
Inland
Migrant
Asian Dowitcher
Limnodromus semipalmatus
Dec
NT
NT
1, 2, 3, 4
Both
Migrant
Bar-tailed Godwit
Limosa lapponica
Dec
NT
LC
1
Coast
Migrant
Little Curlew
Numenius minutus
Unk
Ⅱ
NT
LC
1, 2, 4
Both
Migrant
Eurasian Curlew
Numenius arquata
Unk
NT
NT
1, 3, 4, 6
Both
Migrant
Far Eastern Curlew
Numenius madagascariensis
Dec
VU
VU
1
Both
Migrant
Nordmann's Greenshank
Tringa guttifer
Dec
Ⅱ
EN
EN
1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Coast
Migrant
Great Knot
Calidris tenuirostris
Dec
VU
VU
1, 2, 4, 5
Coast
Migrant
Red Knot
Calidris canutus
Dec
VU
LC
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8
Coast
Migrant
Spoon-billed Sandpiper
Calidris pygmaea
Dec
CR
CR
1, 5, 8
Coast
Migrant
Saunders's Gull
Saundersilarus saundersi
Dec
VU
VU
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7
Coast
Migrant
Relict Gull
Larus relictus
Dec
Ⅰ
EN
VU
1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8
Both
Migrant
Little Gull
Hydrocoloeus minutus
Sta
Ⅱ
NT
LC
2, 4
Both
Migrant
Chinese Crested Tern
Thalasseus bernsteini
Unk
CR
CR
2, 3, 4, 7
Coast
Migrant
Greater Crested Tern
Thalasseus bergii
Sta
NT
LC
2, 3, 4
Coast
Migrant
River Tern
Sterna aurantia
Dec
Ⅱ
NT
NT
2
Inland
Resident
Black-bellied Tern
Sterna acuticauda
Dec
EN
EN
1, 3
Inland
Resident
Population trends include: declining (Dec), increasing (Inc), stable (Sta), and unknown (Unk). The National key protected wildlife include two levels, the first (Ⅰ) and the second (Ⅱ) level. Threats to waterbirds include: (1) habitat loss; (2) human disturbance; (3) hunting; (4) pollution; (5) biology invasion; (6) disease; (7) natural disaster; (8) climate change; (9) genetic diversity loss. Distribution regions were classified as exclusively coastal, exclusively inland, and both inland and coastal region. Residence was classified as migrant and resident The threatened level in the world referred to the IUCN (2012) to match the threatened level in China (Jiang et al. 2016). CR Critically Endangered, EN Endangered, VU Vulnerable, NT Near Threatened, LC Least Concern
DownLoad:
Email Alerts
RSS Feeds