Volume 8 Issue 1
Dec.  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
J. Dylan Maddox. 2017: Assigning hatchlings to eggs: Is relative mass assignment an accurate method?. Avian Research, 8(1): 17. doi: 10.1186/s40657-017-0077-2
Citation: J. Dylan Maddox. 2017: Assigning hatchlings to eggs: Is relative mass assignment an accurate method?. Avian Research, 8(1): 17. doi: 10.1186/s40657-017-0077-2

Assigning hatchlings to eggs: Is relative mass assignment an accurate method?

doi: 10.1186/s40657-017-0077-2
More Information
  • Corresponding author: J. Dylan Maddox, dmaddox@feldmuseum.org
  • Received Date: 20 Feb 2017
  • Accepted Date: 27 Jun 2017
  • Publish Date: 01 Jul 2017
  • Background

    Accurately assigning hatchlings to the eggs from which they hatched is a prerequisite to understanding how the composition and environment of eggs affect the growth and survival of nestlings. Correctly assigning hatchlings to their eggs can be a challenging endeavor, however, because multiple eggs within the same clutch can hatch at essentially the same time. Egg and hatchling mass are highly correlated in most bird species, and thus assigning eggs to hatchlings using their relative mass (e.g., matching the heaviest hatchling to the heaviest candidate egg) could prove extremely useful.


    To assess its potential utility, I applied relative mass assignment (RMA) retrospectively to a dataset of 133 Common Grackle (Quiscalus quiscula) nests in which all egg-hatchling dyads were determined unequivocally.


    I found that RMA correctly assigned approximately 90% of hatchlings to their eggs when 2-4 hatchlings were present between checks. The number of nests in which hatchlings could not be assigned to their egg, however, increased monotonically from 13 to 46 to 78% for nests containing 2, 3, and 4 hatchlings, respectively, due to the greater likelihood that the mass of hatchlings or their candidate eggs was identical.


    Although RMA correctly identified the vast majority of egg-hatchling dyads, researchers should use this method with caution, because it will always inflate positive egg-size effects and thus could potentially result in erroneously reporting significant effects.


  • loading
  • Ar A, Rahn H. Water in the avian egg overall budget of incubation. Am Zool. 1980;20:373-84. doi: 10.1093/icb/20.2.373
    Blount JD, Surai PF, Nager RG, Houston DC, Møller AP, Trewby ML, Kennedy MW. Carotenoids and egg quality in the lesser black-backed gull Larus fuscus: a supplemental feeding study of maternal effects. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2002;269:29-36. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1840
    Clark A, Wilson D. Avian breeding adaptations: hatching asynchrony, brood reduction, and nest failure. Q Rev Biol. 1981;56:253-77. doi: 10.1086/412316
    Deeming DC, Birchard GF. Allometry of egg and hatchling mass in birds and reptiles: roles of developmental maturity, eggshell structure and phylogeny. J Zool. 2007;271:78-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00219.x
    DuRant SE, Hepp GR, Moore IT, Hopkins BC, Hopkins WA. Slight differences in incubation temperature affect early growth and stress endocrinology of wood duck (Aix sponsa) ducklings. J Exp Biol. 2009;213:45-51. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20008361
    DuRant SE, Hopkins WA, Wilson AF, Hepp GR. Incubation temperature affects the metabolic cost of thermoregulation in a young precocial bird. Funct Ecol. 2011;26:416-22. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/261974021_Incubation_temperature_affects_the_metabolic_cost_of_thermoregulation_in_a_young_precocial_bird
    Groothuis TGG, Muller W, Von Engelhardt N, Carere C, Eising C. Maternal hormones as a tool to adjust offspring phenotype in avian species. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005;29:329-52. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.12.002
    Howe HF. Egg size, hatching asynchrony, sex, and brood reduction in the common grackle. Ecology. 1976;57:1195-207. doi: 10.2307/1935044
    Krist M. Egg size and offspring quality: a meta-analysis in birds. Biol Rev. 2011;86:692-716. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00166.x
    Maddox JD, Weatherhead PJ. Egg size variation in birds with asynchronous hatching: is bigger really better? Am Nat. 2008;171:358-65. doi: 10.1086/527500
    Maddox JD, Weatherhead PJ. Seasonal sex allocation by Common Grackles? Revisiting a foundational study. Ecology. 2009;90:3190-6. doi: 10.1890/08-2180.1
    Maddox JD, Weatherhead PJ. Discrepancy between factors affecting nestling growth and survival and maternal success in Common Grackles. J Field Ornithol. 2012;83:17-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1557-9263.2011.00351.x
    Magrath RD. Hatching asynchrony in altricial birds. Biol Rev. 1990;65:587-622. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1990.tb01239.x
    Pike T, Petrie M. Potential mechanisms of avian sex manipulation. Biol Rev. 2003;78:553-74. doi: 10.1017/S1464793103006146
    Royle NJ, Surai PF, Hartley IR. Maternally derived androgens and antioxidants in bird eggs: complementary but opposing effects? Behav Ecol. 2001;12:381-5. doi: 10.1093/beheco/12.4.381
    Williams TD. Intraspecific variation in egg size and egg composition in birds: effects on offspring fitness. Biol Rev. 1994;68:35-59. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8193216
  • 加载中


    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索


    Article Metrics

    Article views (7717) PDF downloads(2) Cited by()
    Proportional views


    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint