Jörg HOFFMANN, Udo WITTCHEN, Ulrich STACHOW, Gert BERGER. 2013: Identification of habitat requirements of farmland birds based on a hierarchical structured monitoring scheme. Avian Research, 4(4): 265-280. DOI: 10.5122/cbirds.2013.0026
Citation: Jörg HOFFMANN, Udo WITTCHEN, Ulrich STACHOW, Gert BERGER. 2013: Identification of habitat requirements of farmland birds based on a hierarchical structured monitoring scheme. Avian Research, 4(4): 265-280. DOI: 10.5122/cbirds.2013.0026

Identification of habitat requirements of farmland birds based on a hierarchical structured monitoring scheme

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Jörg HOffmANN, E-mail: joerg.hoffmann@jki.bund.de

  • Received Date: 14 Mar 2013
  • Accepted Date: 25 Sep 2013
  • Available Online: 23 Apr 2023
  • Agricultural landscapes are essential for the conservation of biodiversity. Nevertheless, a negative trend continues to be observed in many rural areas for the most prominent indicator species group, the farmland birds. However, clear cause-effect relationships are rarely reported and sometimes difficult to deduce, especially from monitoring data which are based only on the detection of species and counts of the numbers of individuals. Because the identification of habitat preferences is a precondition for farmland bird biodiversity conservation efforts, a monitoring scheme for the simultaneous collection and analysis of bird and land use data was developed and tested. In order to assign the occurrence of bird species to land characteristics at various spatial scales and different land use and crop types, we applied a hierarchical structured sampling design. The spatial scales were 'agri-cultural landscape', 'agricultural landscape types', 'field crops and other habitats' and 'vegetation structures'. These scales were integrated with a novel concept, the 'habitat matrix' (HM). This method was applied to farmland breeding bird abundances on 29 plots, each 1 km2 in size, by the use of the territory mapping method. The same plots were enlarged by a 100 m buffer and the sizes and location of habitats documented. Vegetation height, coverage and density were also recorded for all crop fields in the study area. We propose that this monitoring method facilitates the identification of scale dependent relationships between farmland bird habitat characteristics and bird abundance. This is demonstrated by the farmland bird species Corn Bunting (Emberiza calandra), Skylark (Alauda arvensis), and Whinchat (Saxicola rubetra). The breeding territories of these species reveal large differences within the various spatial scales 'agricultural landscape', 'agricultural landscape types' and 'field crops'. Throughout the breeding season the abundances varied, dependent on the field crop and the development of vegetation structures (height, coverage, and density). HM-analysis led to the identification of specific habitat configurations preferred by individual bird species within the agricultural landscape. These findings indicate that the methodology has the potential to design monitoring schemes for the identification of cause-and-effects of landscape configuration, land use and land use changes on the habitat suitability and abundance of farmland birds.

  • The Crested Ibis (Nipponia nippon, Plates Ⅰ and ) (Ciconiiformes: Threskiornithidae) is a medium-sized wading bird, ranging in length from 57.5 to 84.0 cm, with a longish neck and legs, a red featherless face with a crested white head. Its most distinctive morphological character is the long, slender and decurved bill, perfectly adapted for probing in water and mud, or even in cracks on dry ground. The non-breeding adult is white, with orange cinnamon tones in the tail and flight-feathers. The long bill is black with a red tip. Its red legs do not extend beyond the tail in flight (Hoyo et al., 1992).

      Plate Ⅰ.  Crested Ibis (Nipponia nippon). (a) Crested Ibis in flight; (b) Young Crested Ibis (photos by Zhinong Xi).
      Plate Ⅱ.  Crested Ibis (Nipponia nippon). (a) Non-breeding Crested Ibis (photo by Changqing Ding); (b) Feeding the chicks (photo by Jingquan Jiao); (c) Adult and fledglings (photo by Changqing Ding).

    The Crested Ibis is categorized as Endangered (EN) in the IUCN Red List (BirdLife International, 2001) and is listed in Appendix Ⅰ of CITES. It is also ranked as a first class national key protected animal in China (Zheng and Wang, 1998; Ding, 2004).

    The Crested Ibis was widespread and locally common in North-East Asia until the late nineteenth century, when it was breeding in far eastern Russia, Japan and mainland China and was a presumed non-breeding visitor to the Korea Peninsula and Taiwan Island (Fig. 1). The population of the Crested Ibis rapidly declined in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, related to deforestation of pine woodlands as nesting habitat, human persuit, especially over-hunting, drying out of wetland and the abuse of chemical fertilizers and pesticides in paddy fields during the 1950's. This species was even evaluated as extinct in the wild (EW) when the last five wild birds in Japan were caught into captivity in 1981.

    Figure  1.  Distribution of Crested Ibis (Imitated from BirdLife International, 2001)

    In China, the last specimen was collected in Gansu Province in 1964, after which there were no records for a long time (Ding, 2004). In May 1981, after three years of a nation-wide survey, a tiny wild population of seven birds (two pairs and three fledglings) was re-discovered in Yangxian, Shaanxi Province in central China and renewed hope for this species (Liu, 1981).

    After the rediscovery of the wild population, the Chinese government and authorities have made great efforts for the conservation of the Crested Ibis and its habitats. The Shaanxi Crested Ibis Nature Reserve was established in 1990 and this magnificent bird has since been the focus of intensive conservation efforts. The seven original birds are the source of all present Crested Ibis populations, both in the wild and in captivity. Now there is only one wild population remaining in the world, located in Yangxian and nearby counties in Shaanxi Province and has been gradually recovering to more than 600 birds in 2007 (Fig. 2) (Zhang and Ding, 2008). One reintroduced population of about 20 birds has been established in Ningshan County, Shaanxi Province since 2007.

    Figure  2.  Population size of the wild Crested Ibis from 1981 to 2007

    Six fledglings were taken from the wild to initiate a captive population in Beijing Zoo before 1986, where the first successful breeding was achieved in 1989 (Li, 1991). Another captive rearing and breeding program began at the Shaanxi Crested Ibis Breeding Centre in 1990 with the rescue of sick or injured chicks and the collection of some of the eggs deserted by parental birds in the wild (Xi et al., 2002). There are now five captive populations with a total of about 600 birds in the Beijing Zoo, Yangxian and Zhouzhi counties of Shaanxi Province, the Dongzhai Nature Reserve of Henan Province and in Deqing County of Zhejiang Province.

    The annual activity of the Crested Ibis can be divided into a breeding season (February to June), a wandering season (July to October) and a wintering season (November to January) (Wang and Shi, 2000). The breeding areas are located in middle and lower mountains with wintering paddy fields, nesting on tall trees, close to villages. The position of the nest sites is closely related to the availability of feeding grounds and many nests are built close to human settlements, often less than 100 m and sometimes the nest tree is only a few meters from a human settlement. The trunks of nest trees (and adjacent trees) are covered with plastic cloth or razor blades to prevent snakes from climbing up and nets are placed under the nests to catch any chicks that fall out (Ding and Li, 2005).

    The mating system is monogamous. Male and female birds both contribute to nesting, hatching and feeding chicks. Pairs will use the same nesting territory if not disturbed. In the past they were observed to re-use old nests but most pairs now build new nests every year (Shi et al., 2001).

    The wild population no longer migrates, only making short flights to feed in paddy fields below 700 m during the winter and moving to higher elevations (up to 1200 m) to nest in the spring. During the wandering season, the birds move about 25 km (15−45 km) from their breeding areas to planes along the Hanjiang River. They move back to their breeding areas during the wintering season. During the non-breeding season, the ibises gather in flocks for feeding and roosting.

    Breeding starts in late February to early March, with laying from mid March to early April. Nests are flimsy stick platforms, lined with small twigs, leaves and hay, built on branches of trees (Pinus massoniana, Quercus variabilis, chestnut or poplar), at heights of 4−22 m. Usually there are 3−4 eggs per nest, the incubation period is about 28 days; chicks have gray down, white below and become fledglings after 40−45 days. The young birds are sexually mature in 2−3 years. Captive birds in Japan have lived to become 37 years old.

    The size of the home range averages 100.8 ± 49.8 ha (according to MCP method) and 175.6 ± 91.3 ha (according to 90% Kernel method); the breeding home range of different pairs overlaps about 24.5 ± 27.3% and some pairs can overlap up to 46.8−64.3% (Liu et al., 2003).

    The success of fledglings from the wild population was only 11% in the early 1980s, but with effective conservation measures taken since then, it increased to 53% in the late 1990s (Shi and Cao, 2001). Because a high proportion of the wild population consists of young birds that have not yet started to breed (Lu et al., 2000), it is predicted that the wild population of the Crested Ibis will continue to increase and that they will expand their breeding range. The distribution area has been increased from less than 100 km2 to more than 3000 km2 at present. The discovery of a nesting pair in Xixiang County of Shannxi Province in 1999 provides evidence for such an expansion (Ding et al., 1999). Figure 3 shows the dispersal of breeding sites from 20 nests in 1999 to 102 nests in 2007 (Zhang and Ding, 2008).

    Figure  3.  Nest site distribution of Crested Ibis showing the dispersal of the wild population (a: 1999, b: 2007).

    Birds forage during the daytime in small flocks, probe into mud or shallow water with their bill, or pick up prey from the ground. The diet consists of freshwater fish (loaches and eels), amphibians (frogs, newts and salamanders), crustaceans, freshwater mollusks and insects, especially grasshoppers, crickets and adults and larvae of aquatic beetles.

    In winter, the main feeding habitats are paddy fields, riverbanks and reservoirs, mainly close to human settlements. Birds seem able to tolerate human activities in these areas (Ma et al., 2001). The areas where they currently breed are at 470–1300 m elevation (Ma et al., 2001), but elders in Yangxian reported that, prior to the 1940s, they were usually found at lower elevations in areas with slow-flowing rivers. In recent years, they have tended to move into new nesting sites at lower elevations in this area (Zhai et al., 2001), presumably indicating that this relict population had become confined to suboptimal upland areas but is now expanding back into more typical lowland habitats.

    The use of fertilizer and pesticides usually causes pollution in feeding areas and threatens food diversity and richness of the Crested Ibis, especially in the chick hatching period. Research has indicated that food shortage is a major factor affecting the chick survival rate (Ding, 2004). Food supplementation in paddy fields is an effective measure during the breeding season.

    Since there is only one wild population in the world, found in a very limited area, the Crested Ibis cannot avoid being threatened. If wildlife diseases (such as New Castle disease and bird flu), climate disasters (such as heavy snow and extreme drought during breeding season) and outbreaks of pollution in feeding areas, the wild population of the Crested Ibis will be faced with a serious threat to its survival. It is urgently required to conduct a reintroduction program to establish a second and third wild population in other areas (Ding and Li, 2005).

    At present, with the development of captive breeding populations, there are enough captive birds reserved for release into the wild. In 2004, the State Forestry Administration (SFA) organized a survey for reintroduction sites in China (Ding and Li, 2005). GIS techniques were used to detect potential suitable breeding sites for the Crested Ibis (Liu et al., 2006). Since then, four captive populations have been established for wild training in Huayang, Ningshan, Dongzhai and Deqing. Where could potential reintroduction places be found?

    In October 2004, a small captive population was transferred to Huayang, a higher elevation area in Yangxian, for wild training. Up to 2006, 23 birds were released. Now the released birds have joined the local wild population and eight of them bred successfully in seven nests in 2010.

    In May 2007, 26 birds were released in Ningshan County, Shaanxi Province. It was the first reintroduction attempt of the Crested Ibis. With 16 more birds released later, there are more than 20 birds surviving in Ningshan and five pairs of them bred with six fledglings surviving in 2009 (XY Chang, unpublished data).

  • ABBO. 2001. Die Vogelwelt von Brandenburg und Berlin. Natur & Text, Rangsdorf.
    Achtziger R, Stickroth H, Zieschank R. 2004. Nachhaltigkeitsin-dikator für die Artenvielfalt — ein Indikator für den Zustand Jörg Hoffmann et al. Habitat requirements of farmland birds
    der Natur und Landschaft in Deutschland. Angewandte Land-schaftsökologie 63. Landwirtschaftsverlag, Münster-Hiltrup.
    Bauer HG, Bezzel E, Fiedler W. 2005. Das Kompendium der Vö-gel Mitteluropas. Aula Verlag, Wiebelheim.
    BirdLife International. 2004. Birds in Europe — Population Es-timates, Trends and Conservation status. Information Press, Oxford.
    BirdLife International. 2012. BirdLife europe e-news. ; . Accessed 13 August 2012.
    BMU. 2007. National Strategy on Biological Diversity. Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nu-clear Safety (BMU). . Accessed 13 August 2012.
    Bradley J, Sall J. 2011. JMP statistical discovery software: published online 4 Mar 2011. doi: .
    Chamberlain DE, Vickery JA, Gough S. 2000. Spatial and temporal distribution of breeding skylarks Alauda arvensis in relation to crop type in periods of population increase and decrease. Ardea, 88(1): 61–73.
    COM. 2011. Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU bio-diversity strategy to 2020, 244 final. European Commission, Brussels.
    Donald PF, Green RE, Heath MF. 2001. Agricultural intensification ant the collapse of Europe's farmland bird populations. Proc R Soc London B, 268: 25–29.
    Dornbusch M, Grün G, König H, Stephan B. 1969. Zur Methode der Ermittlung von Brutvogel-Siedlungsdichten auf Kontrollflächen. Mitt IG Avifauna DDR, 1: 7–16.
    Donald PF, Sanderson FJ, Burfield IJ, van Bommel FPJ. 2006. Further evidence of continent-wide impacts of agricultural intensification on European farmland birds, 1990–2000. Agr Ecosyst Environ, 116: 189–196.
    EBCC. 2012. European wild bird indicators. . Accessed 19 July 2012.
    EEA. 2007. Halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010: proposal for first set of indicators to monitor progress in Europe. Luxem-bourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Com-munities, Technical report 2007(11).
    EEA. 2010. Assessing Biodiversity in Europe — the 2010 Report. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
    Fischer J, Jenny M, Jenny L. 2009. Suitability of patches and infield strips for Skylarks Alauda arvensis in a small-parcelled mixed farming area. Bird Study, 56: 34–42.
    Fischer S, Flade M, Schwarz J. 2005. Revierkartierung. In: Südbeck P, Andretzke H, Fischer S, Gedeon K, Schikore T, Schröder K, Sudfeld Ch (eds) Methodenstandards zur Erfassung der Brutvögel in Deutschland, Radolfzell, pp 47–53.
    Flade M, Plachter H, Schmidt R, Werner A. 2004. Nature Consertvation in Agricultural Ecosystems. Quelle & Meyer, Wieb-elsheim.
    Flade M, Sudfledt Ch, Dziewiaty K, Hötker H, Hoffmann J, Bernardy P, Ludwigs JD, Joest R, Langgemach T, Achilles L, Rühmkorf H, Tüllinghoff R, Gießing B, Kramer M, Traut-mann S, Dankelmann M. 2011. Positionspapier zur aktuellen Bestandssituation der Vögel der Agrarlandschaft. Vogelwarte, 49: 340–347.
    Geiger F, Snoo GRd, Berendse F, Guerrero I, Morales MB, Onate JJ, Eggers S, Pärt T, Bommarco R, Bengtsson J, Clement LW, Weisser WW, Olzewski A, Ceryngier P, Hawro V, Inchausti P, Fischer Ch, Flohre A, Thies C, Tscharntke T. 2010. Landscape composition influences farm management effects on framland birds in Winter: A pan-European approach. Agr Ecosyst Envir, 139: 571–577.
    Hoffmann J, Berger G, Wiegand I, Wittchen U, Pfeffer H, Kiesel J, Ehlert F. 2012. Bewertung und Verbesserung der Biodiversität leistungsfähiger Nutzungssysteme in Ackerbaugebieten unter Nutzung von Indikatorvogelarten. Berichte aus dem Julius Kühn-Institut, 163: 215S.
    Hoffmann J, Kiesel J, Strauß DD, Greef JM, Wenkel KO, 2007. Vogelindikator für die Agrarlandschaft auf der Grundlage der Abundanzen der Brutvogelarten im Kontext zur räumlichen Landschaftsstruktur. Landbauforschung Völkenrode, 4/57: 333 –347.
    Hoffmann J, Kiesel J. 2007. Abundanzen und Populationen von Brutvogelarten als Grundlage für einen Vogelindikator der Agrarlandschaft. Otis, 15: 61–77.
    Hoffmann J, Kiesel J. 2009. Farmland bird indicator on the basis of abundance and landscape systematization. Avocetta, 33: 79-86.
    Hoffmann J, Kretschmer H, Pfeffer H. 2000. Effects of patterning on biodiversity in Northeast German agro-landscapes. Ecol Stud, 147: 325–340.
    Hoffmann J. 2012. 3.3 Species rich arable land. In: Oppermann R. Beaufoy G, Jones G (eds) High Nature Value Farming in Europe. Regionalkultur, Ubstadt, pp 58–69.
    Morris A, Holland JM, Smith B, Jones NE. 2004. Susstainable arable farming for an improved environment (SAFFIE): Managing winter wheat sward structure for Skylarks Alauda arvensis. Ibis, 146 (Suppl. 2): 155–162.
    Morrison ML. 1986. Bird populations as indicators of environmental change. Current Ornithol, 3: 429–451.
    Newton I. 2004. The recent declines of farmland bird populations in Britain: an appraisal of causal factors and conservation actions. Ibis, 146: 579–600.
    Oelke H. 1968. Empfehlungen für Untersuchungen der Sied-lungsdichte von Sommervogelbeständen. Vogelwelt, 89: 69–78.
    Oppermann R, Hoffmann J. 2012. 3.4 - HNV farmland features in the agricultural mosaic. In: Oppermann R, Beaufoy G, Jones G (eds) High Nature Farming in Europe. Regionalkultur, Ubstadt, pp 85–96.
    PECBMS. 2009. The State of Europe's Common Birds 2008. CSO/RSPB, Prague, Czech Republic.
    Schön M. 2011. Long-lived sustainable microhabitat structures in arebel ecosystems and Skylarks (Alauda arvensis). J Nat Con-serv, 19: 143–147.
    Südbeck P, Andretzke H, Fischer S, Gedeon K, Schikore T, Schröder K, Sudfeld CH. 2005. Methodenstandards zur Erfassung der Brutvögel in Deutschland. Radolfzell.
    Sudfeldt C, Dröschmeister T, Langgemach T, Wahl J. 2010. Vögel in Deutschland — 2010. DDA, BfN, LAG, VSW, Münster.
    Sudfeldt C, Dröschmeister T, Wahl J, Berlin K, Gottschalk T, Grüneberg C, Mitschke A, Trautmann S. 2012. Vogelmonitoring in Deutschland. Naturschutz und Biologische Vielfalt, 119: 257S.
    Weijden WVD, Terwan P, Guldemond A. 2010. Farmland Birds Across the World. Ingoprint, Barcelona.
    Wilson JD, Evans AD, Grice PV. 2009. Bird Conservation and Agriculture. University Press, Cambridge.
    Wilson JD, Whittingham MJ, Bradbury RB. 2005. The management of crop structure: A general approach to reversing the impacts of agricultural intensification on birds? Ibis, 147: 453-463.
    Wretenberg J, Lindström A, Svensson S, Thierfelder T, Pärt T. 2006. Population trends of framland birds in Sweden and England: similar trends but different patterns of agricultural intensification. J Appl Ecol, 43: 1110–1120.
  • Related Articles

Catalog

    Figures(8)  /  Tables(9)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (3235) PDF downloads (2541) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return