Xiaolian SHU, Zhou LU, Gang YANG, Yuanjun MENG, Zhaotian LI, Fang ZHOU. 2013: Survey of the use by birds of various karst wetlands in southwestern Guangxi, southern China. Avian Research, 4(4): 291-305. DOI: 10.5122/cbirds.2013.0029
Citation: Xiaolian SHU, Zhou LU, Gang YANG, Yuanjun MENG, Zhaotian LI, Fang ZHOU. 2013: Survey of the use by birds of various karst wetlands in southwestern Guangxi, southern China. Avian Research, 4(4): 291-305. DOI: 10.5122/cbirds.2013.0029

Survey of the use by birds of various karst wetlands in southwestern Guangxi, southern China

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Fang ZHOU, E-mail: zhoufang768@126.com

  • Received Date: 05 Mar 2013
  • Accepted Date: 11 Sep 2013
  • Available Online: 23 Apr 2023
  • The limestone area located in southwestern Guangxi in the south of China is part of a global biodiversity hotspot. As an important habitat of this limestone region, karst wetlands provide birds with necessary water conditions for their survival and reproduction. From 2007 to 2012, bird surveys were conducted in natural wetlands (pools, streams, springs and seasonal flows) in 14 nature reserves and 18 reservoirs in the limestone area of southwestern Guangxi. A total of 365 bird species were recorded in field investigations, including 103 water-dependent birds mainly seen in wetlands. Among these 103 birds, 10 species are globally threatened and 5 species have been placed under national key protection. The birds were selective in their use of the various types of karst wetlands. The number of bird species was the highest in pools and springs, with 304 and 266 respectively, followed by streams with 131 species. Reservoirs are the main wintering habitat for the large Natatores and in the rainy season the importance of seasonal flows is paramount. Seasonal changes in the utilization of karst wetlands by birds were obvious; the number of bird species in the dry season was much higher than during the rainy season. Bird migration and seasonal flows are the main reasons for seasonal variation in the number of water-dependent birds. These natural karst wetlands ensure the drinking water supply for more than 80% of the water-independent birds in the dry season. These karst wetlands are the wintering ground and stopover area for 58 species of migrant birds. At present, threats to the birds in the karst wetlands consist of illegal hunting, habitat changes and eucalyptus plantations. Karst wetlands are important for protecting biodiversity. More attention ought to be directed to these wetlands and protection efforts enhanced.

  • The Golden Pheasant (Chrysolophus pictus), a species endemic to China, is found in 12 provinces of central China (Lei and Lu, 2006). This distinctive species has received much attention lately, primarily due to the rapid decline of its numbers during the 20th century. Because of its colorful plumage, rampant hunting has been recognized as one of the important factors leading to a population decline of this species in China (Zheng and Wang, 1998).

    For this species, concern about conservation has been well documented in China (Lu et al., 1992; Jiang et al., 1996; Yu et al., 1997; Shao, 1997, 1998; Zhang et al., 2001, 2002; Li and Zhang, 2006). Research of its digestive system was carried out on stomach vas (Zhang and Yu, 2000a), microstructure of digestive tract and liver (Zhang et al., 2000; Zhang and Yu, 2000b; Zhang et al., 2002) and immunohistochemistry of endocrine cells in the digestive tract (Li and An, 2009). However, little information has been published about the diet of the Golden Pheasant (Yao, 1991; He et al., 1994; Yu and Liang, 1996; Shao, 1998), especially with respect to the anatomical structure of its digestive tract. A study on the gastrointestinal tract of the Adélie Penguin (Pygoscelis adeliae) by Olsen et al. (2002) indicated that the digestive system has anatomical and functional adaptations typical for carnivorous birds. In birds that do have a crop, its size and shape differ between species according to feeding habits and digestive strategies. One extreme example is the leaf-eating Hoatzin (Opisthocomus hoazin), in which the crop has replaced the proventriculus and the gizzard as the primary site of digestion, allowing microbial foregut fermentation of dietary structural carbohydrates (Grajal et al., 1989). The gizzard of this bird develops from the posterior part of the stomach called the ventriculus. Pebbles that have been swallowed are often retained in the gizzard of grain-eating birds and facilitate the grinding process (Miller et al., 2002).

    Here, we present a study on the diet in winter and a morphological description of the gastrointestinal tract of the Golden Pheasant. We also consider the implications of our results for the conservation of the species in China.

    Sixty-two pheasants, fifty-two males and ten females, were confiscated from poachers by the Shaanxi Nature Reserve and Wildlife Administration Station during the 2002/2003 winter season. Thirty-seven birds were collected at Shuangmiaozi, Zhouzhi County (108°14′–108°18′E, 33°45′–33°50′N) and the others at Yingge, Taibai County (107°38′–107°40′E, 34°03′–34°05′N), Shaanxi Province in the Qinling Mountains. Necropsy of these birds confirmed that they were all captured by trapping. Because most birds were relatively fresh and not scavenged, their entire corpses were frozen at –4℃.

    Corpses were left to thaw overnight, crops and gizzards were removed and their contents were weighed on an electronic balance to ±0.1 g. Individual food items in crops were identified by species where possible, using standard taxonomic methods. Because the material contained in the gizzards was too digested to identify, it could only be used for analysis of their pebbles.

    Total body mass (BM, n=62) was recorded to nearest 0.1g and standard body length (SBL, n=62) (tip of the beak to base of the tail) to 1 cm. At the distal end of the oesophagus the expanded crop is found that contains food temporarily. The proventriculus is considered part of the gastric region, shaped like a funnel situated between the crop and the gizzard. The muscular gizzard is defined as part of the gastric region between the proventriculus and the pyloric sphincter. The contents of each of the principal sections of the digestive tract i.e., the oesophagus (n=15), crop (n=62), proventriculus (n=15), gizzard (n=37), small intestine (n=15), cecum (n=15) and colon (n=15), were weighed to 0.1g with an electronic balance. The wet tissue weight of each part, as well as the liver, was weighed to within 0.1g. The length of the oesophagus, proventriculus and intestine was measured to within 1mm with each segment fully extended, but not stretched. Both length and width of the gizzard were measured to 1 mm. The pH of the contents and the mucosa of the different sections of the digestive system for only five individuals (n=5) were measured with a digital pH electrode (PHS-25B, Shanghai, China) and special indicator pH paper.

    Variations in the content of crops of individual birds were statistically analyzed using One Sample T test assuming equal variances. Pearson correlation analyses (two-tailed) were used to determine the significance between: 1) the wet weight of the gizzard and body mass; 2) dry weight of the pebbles and weight of digesta in the gizzard. A probability of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All values were reported as means ± SD.

    Only three out of 62 crops were empty. The mass of the contents ranged from 0 to 91.8 g with an average of 24.9±20.4 g (n=62) and varied markedly significant among individuals (t=8.80, df=61, p=0.000). The Golden Pheasant eats exclusively vegetarian items in the winter, with at least 14 species of vegetables, including crops and other plant species (Table 1). Wheat leaves, maize seeds and Chinese gooseberry accounted for 61.2% of the items and almost four-fifth of the biomass consumed. Other items were too infrequent to be important.

    Table  1.  Frequency of food items and percentage of biomass by taxa in crops of the Golden Pheasants in winter
    Species Frequencies of items
    (n = 85)
    Percent
    biomass
    (Σ = 1144.6 g)
    Wheat leaves (Triticum
    aestivum)
    24 55.91
    Wheat seeds (Triticum
    aestivum)
    9 0.75
    Maize seeds (Zea mays) 17 6.05
    Soybean seeds (Glycine max) 2 0.23
    Chinese gooseberry leaves (Actinidia chinensis) 11 17.88
    Southernwood leaves
    (Artemisia sp.)
    6 3.88
    Turnip leaves (Brassica rapa) 5 7.25
    Bromegrass leaves (Bromus japonicus) 2 1.05
    Oat leaves (Avena sativa) 3 0.89
    Fern (Cryptogramma sp.) 1 0.87
    Oak seeds (Quercus sp.) 1 0.57
    Firethorn fruit (Pyracantha fortuneana) 2 0.24
    Grass roots (not identified) 1 3.92
    Poplar leaves (Populus
    davidiana)
    1 0.52
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Mean standard body length was 32.6±4.7 cm (n=62) while the mean total body mass was 738.6±75.7 g (n=62). The digestive tract of the Golden Pheasant is composed of an oesophagus, a stomach and a relatively long intestine. There is an ellipsoidal crop, which holds food temporarily, at the distal end of the oesophagus. The stomach consists of two closely adjacent compartments: an infundibular proventriculus and a deep purple-red muscular gizzard, shaped like a flattened sphere. The intestine consisted of a very long small intestine, two fully-developed caeca and a short colon. The wet tissue weight of the total gastrointestinal tract represented 10.04±1.07% (n=15) of BM.

    The wet tissue weight of the oesophagus (Table 2) ranged from 1.5 to 2.5g and contributed 0.30±0.06% (n=15) to BM. It is relatively short, ranging from 81 to 107 mm, i.e., 0.29±0.04× SBL (n=15). The surface pH of the mucosa of the oesophagus was slightly acidic, with a drop in acidity from the proximal to the distal part (Table 3). The birds have a crop (expandable pouch) at the end of the oesophagus, where its many food items were easily identified. The crop measured 57.8±10.4mm in length (n=62). The tissue wet weight averaged at 5.3±1.4 g and contributed 0.79±0.19% to BM (n=62). The mean surface pH of the mucosa of the crop was 3.8±1.0 (n=5).

    Table  2.  Contents, tissue wet weights and size [means ± SD (n)] of different parts of digestive tract in the Golden Pheasant (gender combined)
    Parameter Content (g) Weight (g) Length (× width) (mm)
    Oesophagus 1.9±0.3 (n=15) 96.9±11.1 (n=15)
    Crop 24.9±20.4 (n=62) 5.3±1.4 (n=62) 57.8±10.4 (n=15)
    Proventriculus 0.9±1.1 (n=15) 3.8±0.9 (n=15) 74.5±4.3 (n=15)
    Gizzard 16.5±4.3 (n=37) 35.9±4.7 (n=37) 60.0±4.4 × 49.2±5.5 (n=62)
    Small intestine 12.9±6.5 (n=15) 11.2±2.3 (n=15) 1147.9±70.9 (n=15)
    Caecum 5.0±2.9 (n=15) 5.6±1.6 (n=15) 203.5±25.2 (n=15) (left)
    215.5±23.2 (n=15) (right)
    Colon 1.0±0.8 (n=15) 2.3±0.6 (n=15) 103.3±10.2 (n=15)
    –, no contents
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table  3.  The mucosa surface pH of the digestive tract in the Golden Pheasant
    Pheasant no. Oesophagus Crop Proventriculus Gizzard Small intestine Caeca Colon
    48 5.1 (P) 3.0 4.0 (P) 4.1 5.1 (Duo) 4.8 6.0 (D)
    3.8 (D) 4.0 (D) 5.4 (DJ)
    49 5.4 (P) 3.5 4.5 (P) 3.5 5.4 (Duo) 5.5 6.5 (D)
    5.1 (D) 5.4 (D) 5.1 (DJ)
    50 5.4 (P) 4.3 5.1 (P) 3.5 5.4 (Duo) 4.8 5.8 (D)
    5.4 (D) 4.1 (D) 5.1 (DJ)
    51 4.8 (P) 3.0 4.0 (P) 3.8 5.4 (Duo) 5.4 6.1 (D)
    3.5 (D) 4.5 (D) 5.1 (DJ)
    52 5.4 (P) 5.4 5.4 (P) 4.1 5.4 (Duo) 5.1 6.4 (D)
    5.4 (D) 5.4 (D) 5.5 (DJ)
    P, proximal; D, distal; Duo, duodenum; DJ, distal jejunoileum.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The proventriculus shaped like a funnel contained 0.91±1.1 g (n=15) digestive mucus. It ranged from 71 to 82 mm, with an average of 74.5±4.3 mm in length and its wet tissue weight contributed 0.59± 0.16% (n=15) to BM. The contents of the proventriculus were acidic (average pH 4.7±0.7, n=5).

    The gizzard is located between the proventriculus and the duodendum and contains much digestive material which was more difficult to identify than that in the crop, with the wet weight of its contents as much as 16.5±4.3 g (n=37). The deep purple-red gizzard was 60.0±4.4 × 49.2±5.5 mm (n=37) in size. This tissue, with an average wet weight of 35.9±4.7 g (n=37), contributed 4.6±0.5% (n=37) to BM, was the largest part of the digestive tract. The wet tissue weight was positively correlated with the BM (Pearson r=0.566, p < 0.01, n=37). Pebbles of different sizes (0.5–3 mm in diameter) were very frequent in this section of the stomach. The average dry weight of the pebbles was 10.4±2.5 g and positively correlated with the weight of digesta in gizzard (Pearson r=0.747, p < 0.01, n=37). The mean number of pebbles was 652.3±137.7, ranging from 400 to 1000 (n=37). The mean surface pH of the mucosa of the gizzard ranged from 3.5 to 4.1 (Table 3).

    The small intestine comprised a duodenum and an ileojejunum, measuring 3.4±0.5×SBL (n=15). It contained, on average, 12.9±6.5 g (n=15) of digesta (Table 1). The wet tissue weight of the small intestine contributed 1.75±0.37% (n=15) to BM. The mucosa surface pH of the small intestine at the distal end ranged from 5.1 to5.5, which was higher than that of the gizzard (Table 3). The average of the fully developed paired caecum was 203.5±25.2 mm long for the left and 215.5±23.2 mm for the right (n=15), measuring 0.60±0.11 and 0.64±0.11×SBL (n=15) respectively. The length of the right caecum was longer than that of the left, but this difference was not significant (t=1.357, p=0.1857, n=15). The colon was relatively short (103.3±10.2 mm, n=15), contributing only 0.36±0.09% (n=15) to BM. The surface pH of the caeca and the colon was slightly acidic (Table 3).

    This study provides information on the wintering diet of the Golden Pheasants in the Qinling Mountains, as assessed by an analysis of the crop contents. Crop contents of the breeding Golden Pheasant sampled ten years ago in the Qinling Mountains contains almost all vegetable items, such as fruits and seeds (59%), lower plants, twigs and leaves (27%) and a few insects (14%) (Yao, 1991). There were also regional variations in the diets. Wintering Golden Pheasant on the south slopes of the Qinling Mountains fed mainly on bamboo leaves and mosses (80%) (He et al., 1994), but the pheasant consumed largely fruits of Pyracantha fortuneana in Mt. Xianrenshan in Guizhou Province during the winter (Shao, 1997). The Golden Pheasant is mostly found in coniferous-deciduous evergreen mixed forests and fall-leaf mixed forests. Our data presented here indicated that the wintering Golden Pheasant lived near human settlements in flocks on the edge of forests and relied primarily on seeds and leaves of crops and it is likely that they are easily captured by traps or poisoning baits during this period. An extra investigation indicated that a large number of Golden Pheasants were poached by local farmers, especially on snowy days. So the managers of the nature reserves should focus their energy on the bird in the areas near human settlements in the winter. Due to its colorful plumage, illegal over-hunting is still the main threat to the species. For example, the number of skins purchased by animal-products companies in areas of western Hunan Province has reached 6000–8000 since the 1960's (Zheng and Wang, 1998).

    The digestive system of the Golden Pheasant also has anatomical and functional adaptations, typical for herbivorous birds. The bird has a crop (expandable pouch) in the end of the oesophagus, which differs both from the carnivorous Adélie Penguin (Olsen et al., 2002) and the extreme leaf-eating Hoatzin (Grajal et al., 1989). The gizzard of the Golden Pheasant is characterized by a massive muscular wall and has a lining that appears to be keratinous. The gizzard grit of the Golden Pheasant observed occurred often, as also seen in seabirds (Cowan, 1983; Olsen et al., 2002) and grain-eating birds (Miller et al., 2002). The markedly significant correlation between the dry weight of pebbles and the weight of digesta in the gizzard indicates specialization of the herbivorous diets. Studies of the Japanese Quails (Coturnix coturnix) have shown that the gizzard could double in size in response to an increased proportion of fiber in the diet (Starck, 1999). The wet tissue weight of the gizzard accounted for 4.6% of body mass in the Golden Pheasant, compared with 1.8% in the Temminck's Tragopan (Tragopan temminckii), 2.0% in the Blood Pheasant (Ithaginis cruentus) (Hou, in litt.), found in regions with relatively higher elevations, which relies mainly on ferns (Shi et al., 1996; Jia and Sun, 2008). The wet weight of this tissue is much lower in several carnivorous penguin species (Olsen et al., 1997 2002; Jackson, 1992).

    The relative length of the small intestine is generally shorter in carnivorous birds, such as the Procellariidae (1.4–2.8×SBL) (Olsen et al., 2002) than that of herbivorous species, including that of the Golden Pheasant (3.4×SBL). The mean retention time of digesta in seabirds is significantly correlated with intestinal length (Jackson, 1992), indicating a relatively long intestinal passage time in the Golden Pheasant.

    Hanssen (1979) compared the microbial conditions in the caeca of wild and captive willow ptarmigan. The function of the caecum may vary, but symbiotic microbial fermentation to some degree is expected to occur in most birds. Wild herbivorous birds such as ptarmigans and grouse (weight 400–1400g) have large paired caeca with a combined length of 70–150mm (Pulliainen, 1976) and are much longer (about 420 mm) in the Golden Pheasant as mentioned above, predicated on high concentrations of plant cell-wall carbohydrates (Hanssen, 1979).

    We are very grateful to the Shaanxi Nature Reserve and Wildlife Administration Station for providing the Golden Pheasants and to Mrs. Wang J., Wang X.W., Li Q. and Hou Y.B. for carrying out bird measurements. Special thanks are given to Mr. Hou Y.B. for providing his unpublished diet information of the other Galliformes species.

  • Acevedo MA, Aied TM. 2008. Bird community dynamics and habitat associations in karst, mangrove and pterocarpus forest fragments in an urban zone in Puerto Rico. Caribbean J Sci, 44 (3): 402–416.
    BirdLife International. 2004. South-east Chinese Forest. . Accessed 16 Jan 2013.
    Bowen B, Pyne M. 1995. May Prairie. Tennessee Conserv, 61 (6): 19–23.
    Chen DH, Jiang HL. 2010. The influence of Eucalyptus planting to water quality of drinking water sources in lake reservoirs. Chem Eng Equip, 7: 172–174. (in Chinese)
    Day M. 2007. The karstlands of Antigua, their land use and con-servation. Geogr J, 173(2): 170–185.
    Estades CF, Temple SA. 1999. Deciduous-Forest Bird Communities in a fragmented Landscape Dominated by Exotic Pine Plantations. Ecol Appl, 9(2): 573–585.
    Fellowes JR, Zhou F, Lee KS, Hau BCH, Lau MWN, LamVWY, Young L, Hafner H. 2001. Status update on the white-eared night heron (Gorsachius magnificus) in South China. Bird Conserv Int, 11: 101–111.
    Hartley MJ. 2002. Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests. Forest Ecol Manag, 155: 81–95.
    He FQ, Zhou F, Yang XJ, Yang L, Deng XJ, Hu HX, Lin JS, Jiang HD, Lin Z, Li L, Zhu KM, Anderson B, Zhang HH, Dong JT. 2007. Study on the status of distribution and subpopulations of the White-Eared Night Heron (Gorsachius magnificus). Acta Zootax Sin, 32: 802–813. (in Chinese)
    Herak M, Stringfield VT. 1972. Karst: Important Karst Regions of the Northern Hemisphere. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
    Howe RW, Regal RR, Hanowski JM, Niemi GJ, Danz NP, Smith CR. 2007. An index of ecological condition based on bird assemblages in Great Lakes coastal wetlands. J Great Lakes Res, 33(Special Issue 3): 93–105.
    Hua N, Ma ZJ, Ma Q, Song GX, Tang CD, Li B, Chen JK. 2009. Waterbird use of aquacultural ponds in winter at Chongming Dongtan. Acta Ecol Sin, 29(12): 6342–6350. (in Chinese)
    Kress SW. 1998. Bird Gardens. Brooklyn Botanic Garden, New York.
    Le TT, Eames JC, Nguyen TD, Furey NM, Kouznetsov AN, Monastyrskii AL, Dang CN, Nguyen ST, Nguyen SV, Nguyen TQ, Bui PX. 2004. Biodiversity Report on the Ba Be /Na Hang Conservation Complex. PARC Project, pp 60.
    LeGrand HE. 1983. Perspective on karst hydrology. J Hydrol, 61: 343–355.
    Loftus WF, Bruno MC, Cunningham KJ, Perry SA, Trexler JC. 2001. The ecological role of the karst wetlands of southern Florida in relation to system restoration. In: Kuniansky EL (ed) U.S. Geological Survey Karst Interest Group Proceedings. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4011. . Accessed 16 January 2013.
    Lü Y, Yin SY, Howes J, Zhu BR. 2011. Survey of waterbird re-source in Cixi Hangzhou Bay Wetland Center in Zhejiang Province. Chin J Wildlife, 32(6): 312–315. (in Chinese)
    Maloney RF, Rebergen AL, Nilsson RJ, Wells NJ. 1997. Bird den-sity and diversity in braided river beds in the Upper Waitaki Basin, South Island, New Zealand. Notornis, 44: 219–232.
    Maquère V. 2008. Dynamics of mineral elements under a fastgrowing Eucalyptus plantation in Brazil. Implications for soil sustainability. Dissertation, AgroParisTech, Paris.
    Mo DX, Qin CW, Huang Y. 1989. Natural condition and social situation of the karst rock mountainous areas in Guangxi. J Guangxi Acad Sci, Suppl 1: 9–20. (in Chinese)
    Palik B, Engstrom RT. 1999. Species composition. In: Hunter ML (ed) Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 65–94.
    Patterson WB. 1989. Vegetation and soils of the Sinking Pond area, Coffee County, Tennessee: Knoxville. Dissertation. University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
    Schofield PJ, Loftus WF, Brown ME. 2007. Hypoxia tolerance of two centrarchid sunfishes and an introduced cichlid from karstic Everglades wetlands of southern Florida, U.S.A. J Fish Biol, 71: 87–99.
    Semlitsch RD, Bodie JR. 2003. Biological criteria for buffer zones around wetlands and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles. Conserv Biol, 17(5): 1219–1228.
    Song XC, Tang J, Qin QY, Pan B, He YH. 2011. Water body monitoring and evaluation of eucalypt plantations in Guangxi. Guangxi Forest Sci, 40 (4): 274–276. (in Chinese)
    Tuyet D. 2001. Characteristics of karst ecosystems of Vietnam and their vulnerability to human impact. Acta Geol Sin, 75(3): 324–325.
    Wolfe WJ. 1996. Hydrology and tree-distribution patterns of karst wetlands at Arnold Engineering Development Center, Tennessee. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investiga-tions Report 96–4277. United States Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USA.
    Zhao J, Chen CK. 1999. Geography of China. Higher Education Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
    Zhou F, Fang HL, Huang G, Zhang HX, Pan HP. 2001. Investigation of Animal Resources in southern Guangxi. Guangxi Uni-versity and Guangxi Forestry Bureau. (in Chinese)
    Zhou F, Fang HL, Zhang HX, Pan HP, Xu YL, Yu LJ. 2002. The waterbirds of mangroves area in the coastal area of Guangxi. J Guangxi Agr Biol Sci, 21(3): 145-150. (in Chinese)
    Zhou F, Jiang AW. 2008. A new species of Babbler (Timaliidae: Stachyris) from the Sino-Vietnamese border region of China. The Auk, 125: 420–424.
    Zhou F, Liu XH, Cao ZN, Li P, Huang CL. 1989. The Bird Resources in Limestone Regions of Guangxi. Guangxi Academy of Sciences. (in Chinese)
    Zhou F, Yu LJ, Lu Z, Deng FY, Zhong, LF. 2005. Preliminary study on nest-site selection of Gorsachius magnificus. Chin J Zool, 40: 54–58. (in Chinese)
    Zhou F, Zhou J, Wei ZY, Jiang AW, Yu LJ, Deng FY. 2004. Study and Conservation of Wildlife in Shiwandashan Region. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese)
    Zhou F. 1994. A preliminary oberservation on the Chinese Night Heron Gorsachius magnificus. In: Waterbird Reserch in China (ed) Waterbird Specialist Group of Chinese Ornithological Association. East China Normal University Press, Shanghai, p 167. (in Chinese)
    Zhou F. 2011. Distribution List of Terrestrial Vertebrate in Guangxi. China Forestry Publishing, Beijing. (in Chinese)
  • Related Articles

Catalog

    Figures(4)  /  Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2718) PDF downloads (2482) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return