
Citation: | Chen YANG, Yinxu HOU, Lizhi ZHOU. 2013: Behaviors of the Oriental White Stork (Ciconia boyciana) in a semi-natural enclosure. Avian Research, 4(2): 161-169. DOI: 10.5122/cbirds.2013.0013 |
Environmental factors affect animal behavior in a variety of ways. Compared to animals in the wild, captive animals are kept in narrow enclosures, suffer higher densities and are more intensely affected by human activities. Therefore, behavioral elasticity is likely modified to some extent in captive animals, which may negatively affect the possibility of successful release of endangered species in the wild. In our study we investigated the behaviors of the Oriental White Stork (Ciconia boyciana) in a semi-natural enclosure from 15 October 2005 to 8 September 2006 in Hefei Wildlife Park, China. The behavioral data were collected by instantaneous and scan sampling methods, and we analyzed the relationships between environmental factors and their behaviors. The amounts of time spent on maintenance behavior (foraging and moving) were at similar levels for birds reproducing multibroods (Group 1), birds reproducing one brood (Group 2) and birds without reproduction (Group 3). On the other hand, the amount of time spent on elastic behavior (defensive, breeding and preening) for Group 3 was lower than that for Groups 1 and 2. The behavioral pattern of the storks exhibited marked seasonal changes, which may be a function of ambient temperature, human disturbanc, and the length of daylight, but not of wind intensity. Our results provide basic data for future conservation measures of this endangered species.
The Himalayan Griffon (Gyps himalayensis), as one of the scavengers of Old World vultures, is a large-sized bird weighing about 10 kg. It usually lives at an elevation above 3000 m (ranging from 600 to 6000 m) and mainly feeds on carrion. Three other related phylogenetic species, i.e., the Oriental White-backed Vulture (G. bengalensis), the Long-billed Vulture (G. indicus) and the Slender-billed Vulture (G. tenuirostris), have experienced their greatest declines in the Indian subcontinent over the past 10 to 15 years, because of the use of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) diclofenac, commonly used in livestock (Green et al., 2004; Oaks et al., 2004; Shultz et al., 2004). All four are now listed as critically endangered species (IUCN, 2004). Despite the lack of any strong evidence that the population of the Himalayan Griffon in Tibet has collapsed in recent years, the species is still at risk and in the absence of baseline information about its population the effect of any conservation measures may be difficult to assess (Lu et al., 2009). Therefore, we summarized any demographic information available on the habitat and conservation status of the population at the Drigung Thel Monastery in Tibet, based on several surveys conducted from June to July in 2003, 2009 and 2012.
The Himalayan Griffon, which has an extensive geographical distribution, is a resident of the high mountain ranges of Central Asia from Afghanistan to Bhutan, including the Pamirs, Turkestan and the Tibetan Plateau (Brown and Amadon, 1968), as well as of northern China, Russia and Mongolia (Del Hoyo et al., 1994; Ferguson-Lees and Christie, 2001). In China, they are found in Tibet, Sinkiang, Gansu, Qinghai, Ningxia, Sichuan and Yunnan provinces. There are also reports of its occasional occurrence in Hebei and Liaoning provinces (Hou et al., 1997; Wan et al., 2003). Our results showed that this species is mainly found in the northern Tibetan Plateau at the Drigung Thel Monastery of Mzizhokunggar County and in Nagqu District near celestial burial grounds.
The Drigung Thel Monastery (30°06′N, 92°11′E, 4400 m elevation), one of the Buddhist temples with more than 800 years of history, is situated on a hill in the Shorong River Valley, located in the northeast of Mzizhokunggar County, Lhasa City. The most famous and auspicious celestial burial ground is situated on top of the hill about 1000 m from the monastery. This area has been occupied by many different carrion birds besides the Himalayan Griffon, such as the Bearded Vulture (Gypaetus barbatus), the Common Raven (Corvus corax), and the Yellow-billed Chough (Pyrrhocorax graculus). The population of Himalayan Griffons has always received much attention because it plays a unique role in local celestial burials. The cliffs at more than 4800 m elevation near the burial ground provide them with night roosting and colonial breeding sites. The vegetation around this temple consists largely of two distinct types: alpine meadow species and shrubs. The areas below 4500 m are covered by shrubs on the southern slope (30°–40°) where the dominant species include Japan Barberry (Berberis thunbergii), Procumbent Juniper (Sabina procumbens) and roses (Rosa spp.) (Fig. 1). The shrubs are primarily rhododendron species (Rhododendron) on the northern slope of the hill, which is steeper than the southern slope. The alpine meadow on the top of hill (over 4600 m), the habitat of the Himalayan Griffon, is mainly covered by Stipa Purpurea (Stipa purpurea).
The number of individual birds of the Himalayan Griffon around the monastery was estimated as 230 in 2003, 250 in 2009 and 200 in 2012. In general, this population is divided into three groups: the first one consisting of 50 –70 birds close to the celestial burial ground; the second group consists of 20–40 birds on the hill ridge above the celestial burial ground and there are 150–180 birds in the third group on top of the western hill. Our data showed that it is a relatively stable population, likely as a result of a sufficient food supply and their unique role in celestial burial. It is told by local residents that two to four human corpses are normally consumed by Himalayan Griffons in the celestial burial ground every day. Furthermore, nothing can disturb them, given the protection of the Tibetan Buddhist monks and local people.
Movements of this population of the Himalayan Griffon are centered on the celestial burial ground, owing to its stable food supply and little human disturbance. This resident species feeds exclusively on human corpses from 7:00 to 9:00 every morning. Then the griffon flocks move around easily and comfortably on the alpine meadows (Fig. 2) with behaviors such as mutual preening, sunbathing (Fig. 3) and even sleeping. Sometimes they spread out their wings towards the sun on sunny days in order to remove the dew attached to their feathers of a foggy morning. After 16:00 in the afternoon, they usually take off, soar in the sky (Fig. 4) and then fly to their night roosting sites, where the cliffs stand no more than 2 km from their "feeding grounds". Our observations indicated that they mostly live in family groups, where most of the old vultures are subordinated in these groups, often observed at their edge and at a disadvantage in feeding. Their night roosting sites are also their colonial nesting sites from May to August. The breeding habitats are at a low risk because their nesting sites are high on inaccessible cliffs.
Simultaneously, we investigated the entire avian community using a line transect and point count method at the Drigung Thel Monastery. A total of 32 bird species, belonging to 5 orders and 15 families, were recorded within the study area. Some of these species, such as the Himalayan Griffon, the Bearded Vulture, the Tibetan Partridge (Perdix hodgsoniae) and the White-rumped Snowfinch (Onychostruthus taczanowskii) are endemic to the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. The dominant species are the Himalayan Griffon, the Russet Sparrow (Passer montanus) and the Yellow-billed Chough. Common species include the Hill Pigeon (Columba rupestris), the Crested Lark (Galerida cristata), the Black-faced Laughingthrush (Garrulax affinis), the Great Tit (Parus major), the Common Raven, the Red-billed Chough (Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax) and the Yellow-browed Warbler (Phyllscopus inornatus). Interestingly, Bearded Vultures often appear in the groups of the Himalayan Griffon without violent clashes, where they then account for 5% to 10% of the population (10–20 individuals). There are three kinds of carrion birds, i.e., the Yellow-billed Chough, the Red-billed Chough and the Common Raven, near the population of the Himalayan Griffon. They usually feed on the leftovers of human corpses following the "breakfast" of the Himalayan Griffon.
The global population has been estimated at approximately 286749 individual birds (Lu et al., 2009) and its conservation status is therefore considered as Lower Risk/Least Concern (IUCN, 2004). Populations of three species of vultures in the Indian subcontinent have collapsed since the early 1990s and are now at high risk of extinction (IUCN, 2004). The main cause of this declines is the use of diclofenac, a non-steroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID), commonly used to treat pain and inflammation in livestock in India, Pakistan and Nepal (Green et al., 2004; Oaks et al., 2004; Shultz et al., 2004). Vultures become exposed to diclofenac when they feed on carcasses of livestock that was dosed with the drug shortly before their death and then die from kidney failure within a few days of exposure (Oaks et al., 2004; Swan et al., 2006). Such a catastrophic decline in vulture population highlights ecological, cultural and public health issues for vulture conservation and raises the need for information on lesser known vulture species (Koeniq, 2006), although it is not known whether diclofenac or perhaps some other NSAIDs can affect the populations of the Himalayan Griffon and other scavengers (Cuthbert et al., 2006). Tibetan people rarely treat livestock with veterinary drugs (Lu et al., 2009). For the moment therefore, this drug may be not a danger to the vultures in Tibetan areas. But this situation may change with the development of the social economy and with the intense growth of human activities in the near future.
Tibetan Buddhism plays an important role in the conservation of the Himalayan Griffon and other wildlife in the Tibet area, with its large number of monasteries. The Buddhist monks and their adherents often provide a variety of food, such as highland barley, tsamb and ghee, to wild birds. Our observations indicated that the population density of birds and forest coverage near temples are significantly larger than that in other areas (Ma et al., 2011). More than 80% of the 5 million Tibetans are intended for eventual consumption by the Himalayan Griffon in celestial burials. Therefore these human corpses form a stable food supply for this population, as well as for other scavengers.
The government certainly contributed to the protection of the Himalayan Griffon at the Drigung Thel Monastery. Recently the Chinese government passed a new regulation (the third of its kind since 1985) to protect Tibetan traditions. This regulation prohibits such human activities as firing, blasting and quarrying around burial sites to avoid disturbance to the scavengers. As well, it does not allow celestial burial for people who have died of toxicosis or infectious diseases, in an attempt to prevent poisoning of the griffons. Therefore the Himalayan Griffon, a hallowed and important bird for local people and the government, enjoys considerable protection from several sources.
On the other hand, local customs greatly limit further study of the population of the Himalayan Griffon, given the excessive faith and traditional culture of the local people. In addition, NSAID remains a potential threat to the population of this griffon in the near future. In fact its conservation status is not as good as it seems because of the lack of ecological information. For these reasons, more and strong measures, highlighting the need for studies on population dynamics, habitat and breeding behavior should be taken in Tibet, even if this population appears relatively stable at present.
We are grateful to the State Forestry Administration in providing financial support for this study. We thank Mr. Rong DONG and Mr. Xia LI most sincerely for participating in the fieldwork in a harsh and arduous environment for so long. As well, there are several local people who are not mentioned, but helped in some way or another, which enabled the successful completion of this study.
Catherine EK. 1990. Reproductive of the Oriental white stork in captivity. Int Zoo Yearb, 29: 85–90.
|
Collar NJ, Andreev AV, Chan S, Crosby MJ, Subramannya S, Tobias JA. 2001. Threatened Birds of Asia: the BirdLife International Red Data Book. BirdLife International, Cambridge UK, pp 194–222.
|
Coulter M, Balzano S, Johnson R, King C, Shannon P. 1989. Conservation and captive management of storks. Proceedings of an International Workshop at the new York's Zoological Society's Wildlife Survival Center, Saint Catherine's Island. Stork Interest Group, Georgia.
|
Hou YX, Zhou LZ, Yang L, Wang QS. 2007. Disturbance to the Oriental White Stork (Ciconia boyciana) breeding in the wintering area. Zool Res, 28: 344–352.
|
Hussell D, Quinney T. 1987. Food abundance and clutch size of tree swallows Tachycineta bicolor. Ibis, 129: 243–258.
|
IUCN. 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
|
Jiang ZG. 2004. Animal Behavior Principles and Species Conservation Methods. Science Press, Beijing.
|
Li HH, Wu HH, Lin SC, Zhen Y. 2002. Study on the reproduction behavior of Ciconia ciconia boyciana raised in cages in Changsha. J Nat Sci Hunan Norm Univ, 25: 82–86.
|
Liu J, Sai DJ, Hu K. 2001. The time budgets and activities of oriental white stork (Ciconia ciconia boyciana) in captivity in spring. Acta Zool Sin, 47: 144–147.
|
Ma JZ, Tian XH, Ma XF. 2006. Present status of ex-situ conservation research of oriental white stork and developmental trend. Chin J Wildl, 27: 17–20.
|
Ogawa H. 2001. International Studbook for the Oriental White Stork Ciconia boyciana. Tama Zoological Society, Tokyo.
|
Senter HF. 2008. Applied linear statistical models. J Am Stat Assoc, 103: 880–882.
|
Simon D, Derek S. 2002. Waterbird Population Estimates. 3rd edition. Wetlands International Global, Wageningen, Netherlands, p 57.
|
Tian XH, Wang JR, Zhang BL. 2005. Time budget of captive oriental white storks in breeding season. Chin J Zool, 40: 35–40.
|
Verbeek NAM. 1972. Daily and annual time budget of the Yellowbilled Magpie. Auk, 89: 576–582.
|
Wang QS, Yang ZF. 1995. Current studies on oriental white stork. J Anhui Univ (Nat Sci), 19: 82–99.
|
Xue WW, Zhou LZ, Zhu SY, Shan K, Wang LD, Xu RX. 2010. Breeding ecology of Oriental White Stork (Ciconia boyciana) in the migratory stopover site. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 16: 828–832.
|
Yang C, Zhou LZ, Zhu WZ, Hou YX. 2007. A preliminary study on the breeding biology of the oriental white stork Ciconia boyciana in its wintering area. Acta Zool Sin, 53: 215–226.
|
Yang XJ, Yang L. 1996. The observation of time budgets of captive green peafowl (Pavo Muticus). Acta Zool Sin, 42: 106–111.
|
Zheng GM, Wang QS. 1998. China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals: Aves. Science Press, Beijing.
|