
Citation: | Naresh Pandey, Laxman Khanal, Mukesh Kumar Chalise. 2020: Correlates of avifaunal diversity along the elevational gradient of Mardi Himal in Annapurna Conservation Area, Central Nepal. Avian Research, 11(1): 31. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-020-00217-6 |
Patterns of biological diversity and richness can vary along the elevational gradients among mountain systems making it difficult to conclude the general pattern. The drivers of such pattern are also poorly known in the southern flank of the Himalaya due to limited studies. Therefore, we assessed the species richness, seasonal patterns and drivers of avian diversity along an elevational gradient on Mardi Himal trekking trail, a newly open tourist route in Annapurna Conservation Area of the central Himalaya.
Two surveys (winter and summer seasons of 2019) were conducted from the bank of Seti-Gandaki River confluence (1030 m above sea level, asl) up to the Low Camp (3050 m asl) of the Mardi Himal. The point count method was employed in every 100 m rise in the elevation. Diversity indices were calculated and bird abundance data on species, sites, seasons and environmental variables were analyzed. Generalized linear model, polynomial regression and ordinary least square regression were performed to examine the importance of environmental factors in shaping the avian richness pattern.
A total of 673 individuals of birds belonging to 112 species, of which 72 in winter and 80 in summer, were recorded. We observed a hump-shaped pattern of the overall species richness along the elevational gradient. The richness pattern remained consistent even when explored by season, for winter and summer separately. Diversity indices were found higher during the summer. Elevation and mean monthly temperature in both seasons showed non-linear relation with avian species richness. Precipitation exhibited positive association in summer whereas the same in winter was negatively correlated with avian species richness. Distance to the nearest water source and the nearest human settlement were negatively correlated with the richness of birds. Small-ranged and insectivorous birds were under the strong influence of gradients on climatic variables like temperature and precipitation.
We conclude that the combined effects of multiple factors such as area, gradients of climate (i.e. temperature and precipitation), resource availability and disturbance play an important role in bird diversity and richness pattern along an elevational gradient of a montane environment in Mardi Himal.
In the breeding season, birds build nests to protect their eggs and young from predators and adverse weather conditions (Zheng 2012; Deeming and Reynolds 2015). However, most birds rarely return to their nests after fledging as this could make them more vulnerable to predators and increase exposure to nest ectoparasites (Scholer 2015). There are only a few reports of reuse of old nests by recently fledged young, such as the Ferruginous Hawk (Buteo regalis) in South Dakota, in which the young returned to the nests to obtain food from the adults and to roost for another 2 weeks after fledging (Blair and Schitoskey 1982). Galliformes are a group of precocial species that chicks leave the nest soon after hatching and move around for foraging following the hen (Zheng 2015). There are not any reports in wild Galliformes that the chicks return to their nests during the brooding period (McGowan 1994).
The Sichuan Partridge (Arborophila rufipectus) is a globally endangered Galliforme species native to the mountains of southwest China. It builds a domed, and partially enclosed nest with a 6–8 cm × 8–10 cm entrance (Fu et al. 2017). During the breeding season of 2011, we first noted that hen Sichuan Partridges led their newly hatched chicks back to the nests where they were born, and then roosted in the nests all together over night. We continued to observe this behavior in the field from 2011 to 2019. The aims of this study were to describe this unusual homing behavior and preliminarily analyze its ecological significance.
The study was carried out at the Laojunshan National Nature Reserve (28°39′36″–28°43′38″N, 103°57′36″–104°04′12″E; altitude 900–2009 m) in southwest China. The climate is temperate with high precipitation (> 1500 mm per year) and relative humidity (> 85%). The average annual temperature is about 12.0–14.7 ℃. The vegetation is characterized by evergreen broadleaf forest, mainly including Castanopsis spp., Schima spp., Camellia spp., Eurya spp., and Rhododendron spp. The reserve has the world's largest wild population of the Sichuan Partridge, about 300–400 individuals (Fu and Chen 2017).
The nests were located through systematic searches during the breeding season. We monitored breeding behavior of the partridge using Tinytag Plus 2 temperature data loggers (TDL) (TGP-4520, Gemini Data Loggers, UK) and infrared cameras (IC) (Ltl 6210, Acorn, CN). The data logger had two external probes, which allowed us to record both internal nest and corresponding ambient temperatures (Fu et al. 2012). The temperature difference was taken as an indicator of adult presence and absence from the nest (Manlove and Hepp 2000; Greeney 2009). The infrared cameras placed at or around the nests were used to monitor activities of Sichuan Partridges and their potential predators. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
In total, 148 Sichuan Partridge nests (including 24 old nests built in the last breeding season) were found from 2011 to 2019. We monitored 60 of them with IC and (or) TDL. A total of 15 successfully hatched Sichuan Partridge nests were monitored during the nine breeding seasons.
Female Sichuan Partridges incubated alone. The incubation period was about 29 days. The chicks left nests for the first time usually in the morning or at noon 1 day after hatching. When the time arrived, the cock came to the nest and served as a guard. The hen walked out of the nest first, and then the chicks followed one by one. In the evening, the hen led the chicks back to the nest, roosting communally over night (Fig. 1), while the cock roosted alone on the tree near the nest (usually < 100 m). Such homing behavior back to the nest was often repeated for multiple nights (Fig. 2). The corresponding ambient temperature at night during the early brooding period of Sichuan Partridge was 12.4 ± 1.7 ℃ (n = 7 nests). The patterns of incubation-hatch-homing by the Sichuan Partridge are shown in Fig. 2.
Of 15 successful nests that were monitored, the homing behavior has been observed in 13 nests (Table 1). For all the 13 nests combined, the hens and their chicks returned to their nests at 18:49 p.m. ± 40 min, and left at 07:00 a.m. ± 36 min. The mean homing times after hatching were 6.7 ± 4.3 nights (range = 1–15;n = 13). At this stage, the hens became very sensitive to the security of nest sites. If disturbed, whether by predators or human beings, they often abandoned the nests immediately and no longer returned thereafter.
Nest code | Monitoring method | No. of eggs hatched | Time for the 1st departure | No. of homing nights after hatching |
201405 | IC | 6 | 0840 | 0 |
201408 | IC+TDL | 5 | 1010 | 0 |
201401 | IC | 2 | 1031 | 1 |
201607 | IC | 4 | 1005 | 1 |
201315 | IC | 4 | 0930 | 3 |
201417 | IC+TDL | 5 | 0855 | 3 |
201106 | TDL | 5 | 0640 | 5 |
201107 | IC+TDL | 3 | 1101 | 6 |
201418 | TDL | 5 | 0835 | 6 |
201515 | IC+TDL | 5 | 0800 | 7 |
201612 | IC | 3 | 0713 | 7 |
201409 | IC+TDL | 6 | 0820 | 10 |
201904 | IC | 5 | 1118 | 11 |
201905 | IC | 6 | 1425 | 12 |
201909 | IC | 5 | Unknown | 15 |
IC infrared camera, TDL temperature data logger |
To our knowledge, this is the first report of homing behavior after hatching in any species of Galliformes in the wild. An explanation for the unusual homing behavior is compensating for the underdevelopment of thermoregulation in the chicks. In most species of Galliformes, the recently hatched chicks lack full thermoregulatory capacity (Zheng 2015). The chicks cannot maintain their own body temperature and are periodically brooded by the hen to prevent them becoming chilled. The Sichuan Partridge has an unusual incubation pattern with low nest attentiveness of ~ 81.2% over the incubation period, and long exposures of ~ 4.2 h below the physiological zero temperature of 26 ℃ for developing embryos for each daily recess (Fu et al. 2017). This may lead to worse development of thermoregulation in the early stage of their life of the Sichuan Partridge than other birds. The ambient temperature at night was low (~ 12.4 ℃) during the early brooding period of the Sichuan Partridge at our study site. Therefore, hen partridges and their chicks may choose to roost communally in the domed nests with good insulation during the chilly nights, which can effectively reduce energy costs that may be critical for the development of thermoregulation in chicks.
Reducing predation risk of the broods is another explanation for the unusual homing behavior. Predation was the main cause of breeding failure of the Sichuan Partridge (Fu and Chen 2017). The partridge prefers to nest near to the trails that are frequently used by pedestrians (Fu et al. 2017). As predators may avoid areas where human activity is high, leading to spatial refuges from predation (Muhly et al. 2011), it is possible that hen partridges lead the chicks back to their nests when they perceive the risk of nest predation to be low. Besides, the main predators of the partridge are some nocturnal mammals with sensitive senses of smell, such as Prionodon pardicolor and Mustela sibirica (Fu and Chen 2017). It is also possible that the domed-shape nests of the species actually shield the chicks and might reduce their scent releasing into the air around them, thus protecting them somewhat from predators.
The homing times of Sichuan Partridge varied greatly, and the longest homing record was 15 nights (i.e., Nest 201909) (Table 1). Five cases of nest abandonment in advance (compared with Nest 201909) were caused by predators (Nests 201515, 201607, and 201905) and human disturbance (Nests 201405 and 201408), respectively. In the remaining nine cases, the reasons why they abandoned their nests were not clear. Considering that the species faces great nest predation pressure during the breeding period (Fu and Chen 2017), and the recently hatched young moves mainly around the nests not far away, we speculate that the predation risk around the nests might affect "decision-making" (homing or abandonment) of the hen Sichuan Partridges.
Scholer (2015) reported a case of post-fledging use of an old nest by an adult House Wren (Troglodytes aedon) and its brood for two consecutive nights when the temperature dropped below freezing to −2 and −3 ℃, respectively. Preble (1961) also reported a similar incident of the Wren. As there are only two independent cases, it is difficult to assess whether this behavior is a stable survival strategy in the House Wren. However, most of the hen Sichuan Partridges in our study exhibited same homing behavior, which may represent an adaptive breeding strategy to cope with high predation pressure and low ambient temperature within their breeding habitats to increase the fitness of offspring.
In conclusion, our findings suggest that hen Sichuan Partridges may make trade-offs between the thermoregulatory needs of young versus the predation risks of the broods, which also provides evidence for flexibility in parental care behavior. Future research is needed to assess the impacts of nest ectoparasites on this unusual homing behavior. In this study, we did not track the chicks' fate due to the lack of effective individual identification and tracking technology. Further work is also needed to determine where the family groups roosted after they abandoned the nests, and what impact will these abandonments have on the survival of the young.
We thank Laojunshan Nature Reserve for allowing us to conduct this study. We thank Ming Xiang, Wencai Chen, Hongbin Li, Chiping Kong, Yongheng Wu and Bo Dai for assistance with the fieldwork. We also thank The North of England Zoological Society (Chester Zoo) for providing some of equipment and facilities for this research through their financial support for the Laojunshan Nature Reserve.
YF and ZZ conceived the study; YF and BC collected the Data; SW and SD analyzed the data; all authors contributed to manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.
Our study was carried out in agreement with the Law of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of Wildlife and was approved by the Laojunshan National Nature Reserve Administration.
Not applicable.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Anselin L. Exploring spatial data with GeoDaTM: a workbook. Urbana: Center for Spatially Integrated Social Science; 2005.
|
Baral R. Birds of annapurna conservation area. Pokhara, Nepal: National Trust for Nature Conservation, Annapurna Conservation Area Project; 2018.
|
BCN D. The state of Nepal's birds 2010. Kathmandu: Bird Conservation of Nepal and Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation; 2011.
|
Bibby C, Burgess N, Hill D, Mustoe S. Bird census techniques (2nd edn.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2001.
|
Dos Anjos L, Boçon R. Bird communities in natural forest patches in southern Brazil. Wilson Bull. 1999;111:397-414.
|
Grimmett R, Inskipp C, Inskipp T, Baral HS. Birds of Nepal: Revised edition. London: Bloomsbury Publishing; 2016.
|
Inskipp C, Inskipp T. Bird conservation priorities of the Annapurna Conservation Area. Report submitted to UNEP-WCMC/King Mahendra Trust for Nature Conservation/Annapurna Conservation Area Project; 2003.
|
Mittermeier RA. Hotspots revisited. Mexico: Cemex; 2004.
|
Neupane J, Khanal L, Chalise MK. Avian diversity in Kaligandaki River basin, Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. Int J Ecol Environ Sci. 2020;46:99-110.
|
Petit DR, Petit LJ, Saab VA, Martin TE. Fixed radius point counts in forests: factors influencing effectiveness and efficiency. In: Ralph CJ, Sauer JR, Droege S, editors. Monitoring bird populations by point counts. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-149. Albany: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station; 1995. p. 49-56.
|
Ralph CJ, Droege S, Sauer JR. Managing and monitoring birds using point counts: standards and applications. In: Ralph CJ, Sauer JR, Droege S, editors. Monitoring bird populations by point counts. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-149. Albany: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station; 1995. p. 161-8.
|
Van Driem G. From the Dhaulagiri to Lappland. J Indian Res. 2014;2:2-19.
|
1. | Eun Sub Kim, Dong Kun Lee, Jiyoung Choi. Evaluating the effectiveness of mitigation measures in environmental impact assessments: A comprehensive review of development projects in Korea. Heliyon, 2024, 10(11): e31647. DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31647 |
2. | Binod Bhattarai, Dipendra Adhikari, Jagan Nath Adhikari, et al. Effects of invasive alien plants and habitat structure on bird assemblages in a unique lowland forest in eastern Nepal. Ornis Hungarica, 2024, 32(2): 1. DOI:10.2478/orhu-2024-0019 |
3. | Daichi Iijima, Takeshi Osawa. Seasonal changes in altitudinal patterns of bird species richness in a temperate low-elevation mountain. Acta Oecologica, 2024, 125: 104033. DOI:10.1016/j.actao.2024.104033 |
4. | Yihenew Aynalem, Afework Bekele, Bezawork Afework Bogale, et al. Population Status and Threats to Galliform Bird in the Arjo-Didessa River Valley, Southwestern Ethiopia. International Journal of Zoology, 2023, 2023: 1. DOI:10.1155/2023/5730010 |
5. | Nasiphi Bitani, Craig P. Cordier, David A. Ehlers Smith, et al. Microhabitat requirements and occupancy of understorey bird forest specialists in Southern Mistbelt Forests of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Forest Ecology and Management, 2023, 549: 121484. DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121484 |
6. | Janaki Paudel, Laxman Khanal, Naresh Pandey, et al. Determinants of Herpetofaunal Diversity in a Threatened Wetland Ecosystem: A Case Study of the Ramaroshan Wetland Complex, Western Nepal. Animals, 2022, 13(1): 135. DOI:10.3390/ani13010135 |
7. | Laxmi Prasad Upadhyaya, Naresh Pandey, Laxman Khanal. Tribhuvan University area serves as a greenspace for birds in the Kathmandu Valley, Central Nepal. Journal of Animal Diversity, 2022, 4(1): 27. DOI:10.52547/JAD.2022.4.1.4 |
8. | Bijaya Neupane, Bijaya Dhami, Shristee Panthee, et al. Forest Management Practice Influences Bird Diversity in the Mid-Hills of Nepal. Animals, 2022, 12(19): 2681. DOI:10.3390/ani12192681 |
9. | Dilshod Akhrorov, Tianlong Cai, Gang Song, et al. Ecological constraints on elevational gradients of bird species richness in Tajikistan. Avian Research, 2022, 13: 100026. DOI:10.1016/j.avrs.2022.100026 |
10. | Sudesh Kumar, Asha Sohil, Muzaffar A. Kichloo, et al. Landscape heterogeneity affects diurnal raptor communities in a sub-tropical region of northwestern Himalayas, India. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17(4): e0246555. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0246555 |
11. | Aadil Hussain Bhat, Altaf Hussain Mir, Samina Amin Charoo. Influence of habitat heterogeneity on the elevational distribution and guild structure of birds in the Rajparian Wildlife Sanctuary, Kashmir Himalaya. Ornithology Research, 2022, 31(1): 51. DOI:10.1007/s43388-022-00111-3 |
12. | Bishow Poudel, Bijaya Neupane, Rajeev Joshi, et al. Factors affecting the species richness and composition of bird species in a community managed forest of Nepal. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 2021, 13(9): 19212. DOI:10.11609/jott.6945.13.9.19212-19222 |
13. | Priyanka Chandna. DIVERSITY AND RESIDENTIAL STATUS OF WADER BIRDS AT HODAL IN PALWAL DISTRICT, IN HARYANA, INDIA.. INDIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH, 2021. DOI:10.36106/ijar/2315406 |
14. | Juna Neupane, Laxman Khanal, Basant Gyawali, et al. Elevational pattern and seasonality of avian diversity in Kaligandaki River Basin, central Himalaya. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 2020, 12(14): 16927. DOI:10.11609/jott.5815.12.14.16927-16943 |
Nest code | Monitoring method | No. of eggs hatched | Time for the 1st departure | No. of homing nights after hatching |
201405 | IC | 6 | 0840 | 0 |
201408 | IC+TDL | 5 | 1010 | 0 |
201401 | IC | 2 | 1031 | 1 |
201607 | IC | 4 | 1005 | 1 |
201315 | IC | 4 | 0930 | 3 |
201417 | IC+TDL | 5 | 0855 | 3 |
201106 | TDL | 5 | 0640 | 5 |
201107 | IC+TDL | 3 | 1101 | 6 |
201418 | TDL | 5 | 0835 | 6 |
201515 | IC+TDL | 5 | 0800 | 7 |
201612 | IC | 3 | 0713 | 7 |
201409 | IC+TDL | 6 | 0820 | 10 |
201904 | IC | 5 | 1118 | 11 |
201905 | IC | 6 | 1425 | 12 |
201909 | IC | 5 | Unknown | 15 |
IC infrared camera, TDL temperature data logger |