
Citation: | Alexander Mischenko, Anthony David Fox, Saulius Švažas, Olga Sukhanova, Alexandre Czajkowski, Sergey Kharitonov, Yuri Lokhman, Oleg Ostrovsky, Daiva Vaitkuvienė. 2020: Recent changes in breeding abundance and distribution of the Common Pochard (Aythya ferina) in its eastern range. Avian Research, 11(1): 23. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-020-00209-6 |
The Common Pochard (Aythya ferina) (hereafter Pochard), a widespread and common freshwater diving duck in the Palearctic, was reclassified in 2015 from Least Concern to Vulnerable IUCN status based on rapid declines throughout its range. Analysis of its status, distribution and the potential causes for the decline in Europe has been undertaken, but there has never been a review of its status in the major part of its breeding range across Russia to the Pacific coast.
We reviewed the scientific literature and unpublished reports, and canvassed expert opinion throughout Russia to assess available knowledge about changes in the species distribution and abundance since the 1980s.
While accepting available information may not be representative throughout the entire eastern range of the species, the review found marked declines in Pochard breeding abundance in the last two decades throughout European Russia. Pochard have also declined throughout Siberia. Declines throughout the steppe region seemed related to local drought severity in recent years, necessitating further research to confirm this climate link at larger spatial scales. Declines in the forest and forest-steppe regions appeared related to the major abandonment of fish farms in western Russia that had formerly provided habitat for breeding Pochard. However, hyper-eutrophication of shallow eutrophic lakes, cessation of grazing and haymaking in floodplain systems necessary to maintain suitable nesting habitat and disappearance of colonies of the Black-headed Gull (Chroicocephalus ridibundus) in a number of wetlands were also implicated. Increasing invasive alien predator species (e.g. American Mink Neovison vison and Raccoon Dog Nyctereutes procyonoides) and increasing spring hunting were also thought to contribute to declines. Reports of expansion in numbers and range only came from small numbers occurring in the Russian Far East, including on the border with China and the long-established isolated population on Kamchatka Peninsula.
Widespread declines throughout the eastern breeding range of the Pochard give continued cause for concern. Although we could address all the potential causal factors identified above by management interventions, we urgently need better information relating to key factors affecting site-specific Pochard breeding success and abundance, to be able to implement effective actions to restore the species to more favourable conservation status throughout its breeding range.
Currently, the dynamics and structure of many bird communities are changing due to the global warming and changes in the land use and management. Many studies dealing with avian communities focus on comparisons between habitat types (Sisk et al. 1997; Paquet et al. 2006; Reis et al. 2012; Santos et al. 2014), between seasons through a given annual cycle (Purroy 1975; Herrera 1980; Arizaga et al. 2009b; 2010) or before and after a given disturbance or management in a habitat (Barlow et al. 2002; Brotons et al. 2005). However, studies addressing how and why this structure varies temporally based on long-term analyses, are few (Sebastian-Gonzalez et al. 2010). Such long-term analyses are called to contribute to understand which factors shape variation at community level under global change contexts.
The Mediterranean region is an area of capital importance for the conservation of many migratory bird populations of northern Europe that either pass over southern Europe in the way to their wintering areas in Africa or choose the Mediterranean as their winter destination (Tellería et al. 1999). Evidence supports the idea that the communities of birds that spend the winter in the Mediterranean region are changing due to climate warming (Morganti and Pulido 2012). In particular, an increasing proportion of birds that would hypothetically overwinter in tropical Africa now stay all the winter in the southern part of the Mediterranean (Morganti and Pulido 2012); at the same time, many species that used to overwinter in the Mediterranean are moving their wintering range to higher latitudes and altitudes (Martín et al. 2014; Tellería et al. 2016; Podhrázský et al. 2017; Pavón-Jordán et al. 2019). Additionally, changes in the land use and management, e.g. under the European Common Agricultural Policy framework, can have a significant impact on bird populations (Donald et al. 2001; Bani et al. 2009), which might also have an effect at the assemblage level.
The Ebro Valley constitutes one of the chief wintering areas for several passerine species in Iberia (Tellería 1988). The reed beds spread across this Valley and concentrate huge numbers of birds that use them to roost, while the surrounding agricultural areas serve as main foraging habitats (Senar and Borras 2004). Reed Buntings (Emberiza schoeniclus) constitute a paradigmatic case of such agricultural-associated birds (Cramp and Perrins 1994). These reed beds, therefore, can be a good monitoring unit to test for the occurrence of temporal variations in bird communities, and to deepen into the factors driving the variation.
The aims of this work are (1) to quantify how variable a non-breeding passerine bird community associated to a reed bed area in the Ebro Valley is, and, (2) to test for the effect of weather on possible annual fluctuations in species' proportions at a regional/local scale. We used for that ringing data collected over a 12-year period.
This study was carried out at the Badina Escudera lagoon (42.27° N, 01.70° W, 281 m above sea level), situated in Navarra, Ebro Valley, northern Iberia. The lagoon occupies ca. 160 ha, and it has been declared as a Natura 2000 site (SPA ES2200039, Badina Escudera).
During the winter season (from October to March) starting in October of 2003 to 2014 (12 years), ringing was carried out on a minimum of 15-days interval basis (i.e., twice a month), but due to different causes (mainly bad weather and logistics) this schedule was not always possible to be executed. Mist nets were open during a period of 2 h before dusk each sampling day. Target species were those that come from northern Europe to overwinter in Spain. The scheme was designed to sample the entire period of presence of these wintering birds in Spain, from passage/arrival in autumn to departure to breeding quarters in late-winter or spring (Tellería 1988; Tellería et al. 1999; Arizaga et al. 2011). All captured birds were ringed, measured, and their age and sex determined (Svensson 1996), though these data were not used in this work.
Meteorological data were collected from the Caparroso meteorological station, located at just 10 km from Badina Escudera (source: AEMET). The data obtained from this station were: (1) monthly average of the daily means and minimum temperatures; (2) monthly accumulated precipitation.
We considered for the analyses three temporal categories, that fitted with the phenological status of short-distance migrants at Badina (Arizaga et al. 2009b): Oct-Nov (passage/arrival of winter visitors), Dec-Jan (winter period), Feb-Mar (departure to breeding quarters/passage). Within each period and year only the first capture event of each individual bird was considered to remove pseudo-replicates.
First, we examined the structure of the bird community for each period, in order to identify the dominant species. Only those accounting for > 10% of the captures were considered to model trends thereafter. With that goal, we calculated the proportion of captures per species and period. After that, we conducted General Linear Models (GLM) with the proportion of captures as an object variable and the year, temperature and/or precipitation as covariates. For the meteorological variables we calculated the mean values for each period (i.e., Oct-Nov, Dec-Jan or Feb-Mar). For each period, we conducted a global (saturated) additive model, which was then submitted to a model selection procedure, for which the 'dredge' function of the package 'MuMIn' for R was used (Barton 2014; R Core Team 2014). Models differing in less than 2 Akaike values were considered to fit to the data equally well (Burnham and Anderson 1998). We also conducted GLM to analyse whether the standardized number of captures (captures/100 linear meters of mist nets) of those species which had major weight in the community had significant temporal trends.
Using this same filtered data set, we conducted a Hierarchical Analysis of Clusters in order to see the relationship among different years using the Morisita-Horn similarity index, which is very responsive to dominant taxa (Magurran and McGill 2011). This index was calculated as [2×Ʃ(xiyi)]/[[(Ʃxi2 /X2)+(Ʃyi2 /Y2)]×XY], where xi is the number of times a given species i is found in sample X, yi is the number of times a given species i is found in sample Y, and X and Y are the number of species at samples X and Y, respectively. The decision to select this index was based on our aim to quantify the role of inter-annual variations in the relative abundance of the most common species on bird assemblage structure. Clusters were built using the UPGMA method and the PAST software (Hammer et al. 2001).
Finally, we also assessed whether diversity indices varied annually and may also co-vary with weather-related variables. We also used the PAST software in order to calculate index of diversity (we used here the Shannon index, H). The H index is calculated as -Σ(pi×ln(pi)), where pi was the proportion of captures of each species. Again, in this case we considered each individual bird only once per period and year. Using a bootstrapping approach, a 95% confidence interval associated to the yearly mean values was obtained and, therefore, it can be stated that overlapping confidence intervals reveal no (statistical) differences among years. Additionally, we conducted linear models in order to test for the effect of weather on diversity estimates. We used for that the program R (R Core Team 2014).
In all of the three periods here studied, the community was dominated by Reed Buntings (with percentages of captures ranging between 54% and 68%; Fig. 1). Except the Bearded Tit (Panurus biarmicus) in late winter, accounting for the 13.5% of captures, we found no other species that reached the 10% threshold of captures (Fig. 1). In winter (period Dec-Jan), the proportion of captures of trans-Saharan species ranged between zero to 0.5% (mean±SD: 0.1±0.2%; Table 1). These species were only present in three out of the eleven sampled winters (2006, 2008, 2012; Table 1), corresponding to three individual birds: a Water Pipit (Anthus spinoletta) in 2006 and 2008 (captures in 03 Dec 2006 and 28 Jan 2008), and a Willow Warbler (Phylloscopus trochilus) in 2012 (06 Dec 2012).
Winter | P | T | T% |
2003 | 290 | 0 | 0 |
2004 | 538 | 0 | 0 |
2005 | 585 | 0 | 0 |
2006 | 572 | 1 | 0.2 |
2007 | 331 | 0 | 0 |
2008 | 191 | 1 | 0.5 |
2009 | 241 | 0 | 0 |
2010 | 122 | 0 | 0 |
2011 | 205 | 0 | 0 |
2012 | 195 | 1 | 0.5 |
2013 | 52 | 0 | 0 |
The winter of 2003 corresponds to the one starting in December of 2003, and soon P, number of captures of pre-Saharan passerines; T, number of captures of transSaharan passerines; T%, percentage of captures of trans-Saharan passerines |
Overall, the proportion of Reed Buntings in any of the three temporal units considered tended to decrease along the study period (Fig. 2), at a mean rate of ca. -4%/year (so a decrease of ca. 50% in 12 years).
Clustering analyses revealed, however, that, within each period, the structure of the assemblage was rather uniform across time, with overlaps of > 70% (often > 90%) among years (Fig. 3). An exception to this pattern, however, arose in 2014, both during the period Oct-Nov and Feb-Mar (but not in mid-winter, i.e. period Dec-Jan). In 2014, the assemblage had a different structure, differing in > 50% in relation to the assemblages detected in previous years. A detailed look at this year, as compared to the mean values obtained up to then (2003‒2013), revealed that during the period Oct-Nov in 2014 we captured a higher proportion of Reed Warblers (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) and Bluethroats (Luscinia svecica) and less Reed Buntings; during the period Feb-Mar in 2014, we captured a proportionally higher number of Green Finches (Chloris chloris) and Bearded Tits (Fig. 4). These results, however, could be biased by a decreasing sampling effort in 2014, when the lack of sampling in Feb and the existence of just one sampling day in Nov resulted in the loss of good periods of passage of Reed Buntings, hence their abundance might be under-represented (Additional file 1: Table S1).
Models showed that the proportion of Reed Buntings has declined dramatically from 2003 to 2014, both during the period Oct-Nov and Dec-Jan (i.e., during the autumn migration period and the wintering) (Table 2). None of the models that best fitted the data included weather effects (Additional file 1: Table S2) on Reed Buntings' proportion. If we remove 2014 for the reason shown above, we obtain results very similar to those shown in Table 2 (new table not included), especially for the negative effect of year on the proportion of captures of Reed Buntings. Furthermore, we also detected that the standardized number of captures of Reed Buntings tended to decrease along the study period, with this trend being significant for the Dec-Jan period (Fig. 5; slopes' significance: Oct-Nov, t=0.157, P=0.875; Dec-Jan, t=2.904, P=0.005; Feb-Mar, t=0.379, P=0.706).
Models | AICc | ΔAICc | AICc weight |
Period: Oct–Nov. | |||
1. Year | 102.5 | 0.0 | 0.596 |
2. Year + Tmean | 105.7 | 3.2 | 0.122 |
Global | 119.6 | 17.1 | 0.000 |
Period: Dec–Jan. | |||
1. Year | 90.2 | 0.0 | 0.724 |
2. Year + Prec | 93.9 | 6.7 | 0.115 |
Global | 109.4 | 19.2 | 0.000 |
Period: Feb–Mar. | |||
1. Null | 111.0 | 0.0 | 0.293 |
2. Year | 111.5 | 0.5 | 0.223 |
3. Tmin | 111.6 | 0.6 | 0.210 |
Global | 128.2 | 17.2 | 0.000 |
Within each period, we show the list of models up to the first one with a ΔAICc > 2, and the global (saturated) model Year, linear effect of year; Tmean, mean temperature; Tmin, minimum temperature; Prec, precipitation; Null; null model with a constant intercept; AICc, small-sample size corrected Akaike values; ΔAICc, difference in relation to the Akaike value of the first model |
The diversity index differed markedly among years (Fig. 6). Overall, we detected a significant, positive trend for the first period (Oct-Nov: adjusted R2=0.46, P=0.008), a marginal trend for the Dec-Jan period (R2=0.28, P=0.054), and a non-significant trend for the third period (Feb-Mar: R2=0.10, P=0.920).
The structure of a wintering passerine community in Badina Escudera, one of the main wetlands from Navarra (Ebro Valley) changed during the period of 12 years in which the study was done. Though, overall, the assemblage did not vary strongly among years (most similarity values were > 0.8; Fig. 3), we still found a significant linear effect of year in the proportion of captures of Reed Buntings, i.e., the dominant species detected in our passerine community. The analyses of avian communities often rely on data sets where long-term trends are rarely targeted. Our study is hence one of the few addressing such a question in a passerine community in Spain (Peiró 2018).
The increasing loss of weight of Reed Buntings in the community was likely due to a progressive decrease in the abundance of this species. Thus, in the mid-winter period, we passed from a mean number of 33.4 captures/100 linear meters of mist nets during the winter of 2003 to 12.4 captures/100 linear meters in 2014. The trend for the whole country remains uncertain (SEO/BirdLife 2012), but in some regions like Cataluña a decrease of 5% is estimated (Herrando et al. 2011). In Navarra, this decrease in the abundance may be due to several reasons: (1) habitat changes that may promote the spread and/or disappearance of Reed Buntings across/from the region, and (2) population declines. Though Badina and the nearby surrounding cropland did not suffer a remarkable change during the period in which the study was carried out (J. Arizaga obs. per.), we must notice habitat changes at a regional scale. The area occupied by the wet cultivations in the region has passed from < 76, 000 ha in 2002 to 84, 000 in 2010 (+10.5%), a trend that still is increasing (source: Government of Navarra). In parallel to this process, new ponds and ditches were created, and new reed beds (with potential to host Reed Buntings' roosts) were formed, which overall might have contributed to the dispersal of the species and reduction of Reed Bunting numbers in the old, 'traditional' roosts existing in wetlands such as Badina Escudera. A decrease of Reed Buntings arriving to overwinter in Spain is also plausible. This may be shaped by two processes: the fact that the species may overwinter in regions further to the north, which may be associated with the climate warming (Golawski and Kasprzykowski 2010; Martín et al. 2014; Pavón-Jordán et al. 2019; Wuczyński and Wuczyński 2019), and/or the consequence of real population declines. Following this last idea, it is seen that the Reed Bunting is in decline in Europe (Staneva and Burfield 2017), as is also declining in some of origin areas of birds that overwinter in Spain (Villarán 1999), more particularly in Badina Escudera (Arizaga et al. 2009b), such as France (Issa and Muller 2015) or Germany (Gedeon et al. 2015). And additional hypothesis associated with the decreasing of numbers of Reed Buntings in the area may be due to competition with other species which could be benefited by the climate warming and/or other processes of environmental change.
Weather is one of the capital factors shaping the spatio-temporal geographic distribution of bird populations (Elkins 1983; Cresswell 2014; Haest et al. 2018, 2019). However, the structure and diversity of passerine community in Badina Escudera was not influenced by meteorological conditions at a local scale. In another study carried out in a wetland in central Spain, researchers did not find that the inter-annual survival of Reed Buntings was affected by local temperature hence suggesting a lack of (significant) effect of winter temperature on this species' demography at a local level (Mezquida and Villarán 2006). However, winter severity in Spain correlated with apparent annual survival of Reed Buntings breeding in Germany (Salewski et al. 2013), hence it seems that meteorological conditions during the winter have an impact on Reed Buntings' demography. If the weather affects the geographic distribution of Reed Buntings in winter, it is likely that such distribution is modulated by climatic conditions operating at larger scales.
The presence of trans-Saharan passerines in winter was totally marginal through the entire study period (mean, 0.1%). Such results suggest that the presence of these long-distance migrants in winter was still low in the studied wetland, as it seems to be also the case in other nearby sites within the region (Arizaga et al. 2009a; Mazuelas et al. 2018). This contrasts with the scenario already existing in southern Iberia, remarkably within the lowlands of the Guadalquivir Valley, where there is an increasingly high number of wintering trans-Saharan birds, both passerines and non-passerines (Morganti and Pulido 2012). Due to its geographic position in northern Iberia, the Ebro Valley is called to play a role as a sentinel region to document a potential geographical northward spread of trans-Saharan species in winter.
In conclusion, we detected that a non-breeding passerine bird community in a Mediterranean wetland in northern Spain varied during a period of 12 years. Reed Buntings were dominant, but their proportion and abundance tended to decrease across this period, especially if we focus on the mid-winter period. We did not find evidence supporting that local weather would have an impact on Reed Buntings' proportion. Ultimate causes underlying our findings may be related to both/either habitat changes and climate warming.
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-020-00215-8.
Additional file 1: Table S1. Number of sampling days, per month and year, at Badina Escudera. Table S2. Mean values of the mean and minimum temperature and accumulated precipitation (Tmean, Tmin, Prec, as in Table 2) at Badina de Escudera, during the three time units considered in this study.
C. Astrain, J. M. Vadillo, and three reviewers provided valuable comments that helped us during the writing process of this work.
Conception: JA, DA. Data collection: JA, DA, AC, XE, EF, IL, DM, AV. Data analysis: JA, DA, AC. Writing: JA. Revision of the work: DA, AC, XE, EF, IL, DM, AV. All co-authors have approved the submission and agreed both to be personally accountable for the author's own contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even ones in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the Aranzadi Ringing Scheme but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of the Aranzadi Ringing Scheme.
The Government of Navarra provided the licenses for bird ringing.
Not applicable.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Andreev BN. Birds of Vilyui basin. Yakutsk: Book Press; 1987 (in Russian).
|
Antonov AI, Parilov MP. Assessment of recent status of protected birds in the east of Amurskaya Oblast. Amurian Zool Mag. 2009;1:270-4 (in Russian).
|
Azarov VI. Resources of waterfowl in Tobol-Ishim forest-steppe, their conservation and use. PhD Thesis. Moscow: Moscow University; 1991 (in Russian).
|
Bukreev SA, Chernobay VF. Data on Anseriformes of the Volgograd Sarpa. Casarca. 2011;14:223-39 (in Russian).
|
Chernichko II, Kostyushin VA. Retrospective review of results of the ornithological monitoring in wetlands: Molochnyi Liman. Results Regional Ornithol Monitoring. 2015;9:68 (in Russian).
|
Chudnenko DE. Dynamics of bird fauna and populations in peat extractions on a sample of Sakhtysh-Rubskoye area (Ivanovo Region, Russia). In: Population dynamics of birds in terrestrial landscapes. Proceedings of the Russian Scientific Conference ZBS MSU March 17-21 2017. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press; 2017. p. 268-76 (in Russian).
|
Cramp S, Simmons KEL. Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. The birds of the Western Palearctic, vol. 1. Oxford: University Press; 1977.
|
Degtyarev AG. Game birds of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). Yakutsk: Yakutsk Branch of State Publishing House of SB RAS; 2004 (in Russian).
|
Degtyarev AG. Waterfowl and waterbirds in the conditions of cryo-arid plain. Novosibirsk: Nauka; 2007 (in Russian).
|
Elsukov SV. Monitoring of waterfowl of Lake Blagodatnoye in the period of spring and autumn migrations. In: Potichina EV, editor. Results of conservation and study of nature complexes of Sikhote-Alin'. Vladivostok: Primpoligrafcombinat; 2005. p. 173-180 (in Russian).
|
Elsukov SV. Birds of the North-East Primorie: non-Passeriformes. Vladivostok: Dal'nauka; 2013 (in Russian).
|
FAO/EBRD. Russian Federation: a review of the fishery sector. New York: UN Food and Agriculture Organisation/European Bank for Reconstruction and Development Cooperation Programme Report N12; 2008.
|
Fedyushin AV, Dolbik MS. Birds of Belarus. Minsk: Science and technology; 1967 (in Russian).
|
Fefelov IV, Shinkarenko AV, Podkovyrov VA. Trend of the duck populations in Selenga Delta. Russ Ornithol Mag. 1995;1(2):45-53 (in Russian).
|
Fefelov IV, Voronova SG, Povarintsev AI. Numbers and survival of duck broods in the mouth of river Irkut in the last decade. Baikal Zool Mag. 2009;1:94-9 (in Russian).
|
Frolov VV. Birds of Penza Region and adjacent territories. Vol. 1. Non-passeriformes. Penza: Penza University Press; 2017 (in Russian).
|
Gerasimov NN, Gerasimov YN. Investigations of migrations of waterfowl and waterbirds in Kamchatka. In: Savelieva AP, Seredkina IV, editors. Ranges, migrations and other movements of wildlife. Materials of the International science and applied conference. Vladivostok: OOO Reja; 2014. p. 52-61 (in Russian).
|
Gerasimov YN, Gerasimov NN. Birds of Elovka River. In: Artjukhin YB, Gerasimov YN, editors. Biology and conservation of the birds of Kamchatka. No. 8 Moscow: Wildlife Conservation Center Press; 2008. p. 38-64 (in Russian).
|
Glushchenko YN, Bocharnikov VN, Mrikot KN, Korobov DV. Centuries dynamics of numbers of Anseriformes in Lake Khanka Lowland. In: Bukreev SA, editor. Inventory, monitoring and conservation of IBAs in Russia. No. 5 Moscow: Russian Bird Conservation Union; 2005. p. 19-36 (in Russian).
|
Glushchenko YN, Shibnev YN, Volkovskaya-Kurdjukova EA. Birds. In: Nazarenko AA, editor. Vertebrates of Zapovednik Khankajskiy and Lake Khanka Lowland. Vladivostok: GPBZ Khankaisky Press; 2006. p. 77-233 (in Russian).
|
Glushchenko YN, Nechaev VA, Red'kin YA. Birds of Primorski Krai: brief faunistical review. Moscow: KMK Press; 2016 (in Russian).
|
Glushenkov OV, Isakov GN, Osmelkin EV. Cadastre assessment of condition of gull colonies in Chuvash Republic. Ecol Bull Chuvash Republic. 2007;57:29-44 (in Russian).
|
Grishanov G, Švažas S. The Neman River delta—internationally important area for migratory wildfowl species. Vilnius: Akstis; 2013 (in Russian).
|
Iovchenko NP. Ecosystems of the nature reserve "Lakes Rakovye": history and present state. Saint-Petersburg: Saint-Petersburg University Press; 2012 (in Russian).
|
Isakov YA, Ptushenko ES. Order Anseriformes. In: Dementiev GP, Gladkov NA, editors. Birds of the Soviet Union, vol. IV. Moscow: Sovetskaya nauka; 1952. p. 247-635 (in Russian).
|
Ivanauskas T. Birds of Lithuania Wildfowl, vol. 2. Vilnius: State Publishers of Scientific Literature; 1959 (in Lithuanian).
|
Kear J. Ducks, Geese and Swans. Bird families of the World. Oxford: University Press; 2005.
|
Khrabry VM. Game animals of Leningrad Region. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg University Press; 2016 (in Russian).
|
Klimov SM, Sarychev VS, Melnikov MV, Zemlyanukhin AI. Bird fauna of the Upper Don Basin. Non-passeriformes. Lipetsk: LGPU; 2004 (in Russian).
|
Komdeur J, Bertelsen J. Manual for aeroplane and ship surveys of waterfowl and seabirds. Slimbridge: International Waterbird and Wetlands Research Bureau Special Publication 19 IWRB; 1992.
|
Koskimies P, Väisänen RA. Monitoring bird populations: a manual of methods applied in Finland. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Zoological Museum; 1991.
|
Krivenko VG, Vinogradov VG. Birds of the water environment and rhythms of climate of the Northern Eurasia. Moscow: Nauka; 2008 (in Russian).
|
Lobkov EG. Nesting birds of Kamchatka. Vladivostok: Far East Science Centre, USSR Academy of Sciences; 1986 (in Russian).
|
Lokhman YV, Gozhko AA. Counts of waterfowl, shorebirds and seabirds in the Krasnodar Region in November 2017. Russ J Ornithol. 2017;28:4591-7 (in Russian).
|
Lysenko V. The fauna of Ukraine Birds. Vol. 5. Anseriformes. Kiev: Naukova Dumka; 1991 (in Russian).
|
Malchevsky AS, Pukinsky YB. Birds of Leningrad Region and contiguous territories, vol. 1. Leningrad: University Press; 1983 (in Russian).
|
Merikallio E. Einwanderungsgeschichte der Vogelfauna des Ayrapaanjarvi-Sees in Suomi Finland Istmus Karelicus. Berlin: Proceedings of the VI International Ornithological Congress, Berlin; 1929. p. 484-93 (in German)
|
Miklin NA, Shitikov DA, Babushkin MV. Square 37VDH4, Vologda and Arkhangelsk regions. In: Voltzit OV, Kalyakin MV, editors. The fauna and abundance of European Russia Birds Annual report on the Programme "Birds of Moscow City and the Moscow Region". Moscow: Fiton Century Publications; 2013. p. 351-353 (in Russian).
|
Mikhantyev AI, Selivanova MA. Population dynamics of several species of ducks in the south of West Siberia (North Kulunda) related to hydrologic, climatic, and meteorological conditions. Casarca. 2016;19:67-80 (in Russian).
|
Mischenko AL. Value of fishponds of for bird fauna in the conditions of man-made landscape (on an example of Moscow Region). PhD Thesis. Moscow: Moscow State University. 1985 (in Russian).
|
Mischenko AL. Estimations of numbers and trends for birds of the European part of Russia ("Birds in Europe-II"). Moscow: Russian Bird Conservation Union; 2004.
|
Mischenko AL. Estimations of numbers and trends for birds of the European Russia ("European Red List of Birds"). Moscow: BirdsRussia; 2017.
|
Mischenko AL, Sukhanova OV. Fishponds as the main refuges of waterbirds in the Moscow Region. OMPO Newsl. 2006;26:47-50.
|
Mischenko AL, Sukhanova OV. Results of long-term monitoring of breeding ducks' numbers in Vinoradovo floodplain (Moscow oblast). Casarca. 2016a;19:31-48 (in Russian).
|
Moskalev VA. Hunting on waterfowl in Leningrad oblast. Hunting, Peltry Quarry. 1977;56:3-10 (in Russian).
|
Mundkur T, Langendoen T, Watkins D. The Asian Waterbird Census 2008-2015: Results of coordinated counts in Asia and Australasia. Ede, The Netherlands: Wetlands International; 2017.
|
Nagy S, Flink S, Langendoen T. Waterbird trends 1988-2012: Results of trend analyses of data from the International Waterbird Census in the African-Eurasian Flyway. Ede, The Netherlands: Wetlands International; 2014.
|
Neifeldt IA. Review of the ornithological studies in Karelia. Proc Zool Inst Russ Acad Sci. 1970;47:67-110 (in Russian).
|
Numerov AD. Birds Aves Natural resources of Voronezh Region Vertebrate Animals Cadaster. Voronezh: Biomik; 1996 (in Russian).
|
Ostrovsky OA, Natykanets VV. Monitoring of waterfowl. In: Sushchenya LM, Semenchenko VP, editors. Monitoring of fauna of Belarus basic principles and results. Minsk: Belarus Research Centre of Ecology; 2005. p. 127-35 (in Russian).
|
Ostrovsky OA, Natykanets VV, Zhuravlev DV. Changes in species composition and abundance of waterbirds of Lake Osveyskoe during the last 30 years. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Protected areas of NW Belarus. Vitebsk: Vitebsk University; 2009. p. 66‒7 (in Russian).
|
Petkov N, Hughes B, Gallo-Orsi U. Ferruginous Duck: from research to conservation. Sofia, Bulgaria: Birdlife International-RSPB-TWSG; 2013.
|
Polivanova NN. Birds of Lake Khanka. Part 1. Vladivostok: DVNC of Academy of Science USSR Press; 1971 (in Russian).
|
Polyakov GI. The ornithological fauna of Moscow Province. Materials to knowledge of fauna and flora of Russian Empire. Dept Zoo. 1910;10:1-211 (in Russian).
|
Ptushenko ES, Inozemtsev AA. Biology and economic value of the birds of Moscow Region and adjacent territories. Moscow: Moscow University Press; 1968 (in Russian).
|
Ryabitsev VK. Birds of Siberia. A field guide in two volumes, vol. 1. Moscow—Ekaterinburg: Armchair Scientist; 2014 (in Russian).
|
Ryazanova NE, Kravchuk MV. Changes of the areas of Sarpinskie Lakes in 2005-2016. In: Akhmetov IG, editor. Materials of the 3rd International Conference on Sciences on the Earth: yesterday, today, tomorrow. Saint Petersburg: Svoyo Isdatelstvo Press; 2017. p. 26-32 (in Russian).
|
Rusanov GM. Aerial monitoring of mass bird species the Volga avandelta (2006-2010). Ornithol Bull Kazakhstan Cent Asia. 2013;2:146-65 (in Russian).
|
Sarantseva EI. Structure and spatial distribution of bird communities in the valley ecosystems of small rivers in Low Volga Basin. PhD Thesis. Saratov: Saratov State University; 2003 (in Russian).
|
Sarychev VS, Batishchev DL. Avifauna of the Gryazinsky Fishponds. Bull Rare Plants Animals Lipetsk Region. 2012;5:60-88 (in Russian).
|
Serebryakov V, Vorobyev E, Gorban I, Davidenko I, Korzyukov A, Lugovoj A, et al. The status and number of certain waterbird species in Ukraine. Kiev: Fitosociocenter Press; 2003.
|
Shulpin LM. Commercial, hunting and predatory birds of Primorye. Vladivostok: Far Eastern branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences Press; 1936 (in Russian).
|
Sotnikov VN. Birds of Kirov Region and contiguous territories. Vol.1. Non-passerines. Part 1. Kirov: OOO Triada-S; 1999 (in Russian).
|
Stepanyan LS. Conspectus of ornithological fauna of Russia and neighbouring territories. Moscow: Nauka; 2003 (in Russian).
|
Sukhanova OV. Nesting ecology of the Tufted Duck Aythya fuligula and the Pochard Aythya ferina in Central Russia. Gibier Faune Sauvage. 1996;13:709-22.
|
Syroechkovskiy EE. Field guide of Anseriformes of Russia. Moscow: Zoological Museum of Moscow State University; 2011 (in Russian).
|
Švažas S, Drobelis E, Balciauskas L, Raudonikis L. Important wetlands in Lithuania. Vilnius: Akstis; 1999.
|
Švažas S, Kozulin A. Waterbirds of large fishponds of Belarus and Lithuania. Vilnius: Lithuanian Institute of Ecology; 2002.
|
Takahashi T. On the birds breeding near lake Taraika, S Sakhalin. Tori. 1942;11:370-89.
|
Tarasov VV. Recent condition of recourses of Anseriformes in Tobol-Ishim forest-steppe. In: Popovkina AB, editor. Abstracts of International Conference "Anatidae of North Eurasia: study, protection and wise use". Salekhard: Working group on geese of Northern Eurasia; 2015. p. 89-90 (in Russian).
|
Tischler F. Die Vögel Ostpreußens und seiner Nachbargebiete. Königsberg und Berlin: Bd.; 1941 1-2 (in German).
|
Tilba PA, Mnatsekanov RA. Avifauna of Priazovsky Nature Reserve. Acta Sochi National Park. 2014;6:60-120 (in Russian).
|
Tsyndzhapova ND. Seasonal dynamics of bird population in the wetland complex of city Irkutsk. Bull State Agr Acad Buryatia. 2009;3:138-42 (in Russian).
|
Viksne J. The birds of Lake Engure. Riga: Jana seta Press; 1997.
|
Viksne J, Švažas S, Czajkowski A, Janaus M, Mischenko A, Kozulin A, et al. Atlas of Duck Populations in Eastern Europe. Vilnius: Akstis; 2010.
|
Vorobiev KA. Birds of Ussurijskiy Kraj. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences Press; 1954 (in Russian).
|
Vorobiev KA. Birds of Yakutia. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences Press; 1968 (in Russian).
|
Voronov LN, Glushenkov OV, Isakov GN, Osmelkin EV, Yakovlev AA, Yakovlev VA. Birds of Chuvashia Non-passeriformes, vol. 1. Cheboksary: Chuvash Press; 2016 (in Russian).
|
Voronov VG, Voronov GA, Neverova TI, Eremin YP, Voronov GV, Zdorikov AI. Birds of the Lake Nevskoye (Sakhalin Island). Juzhno-Sakhalinsk: SakhKNII; 1983 (in Russian).
|
Vyazovich V. Ducks of Belarus. Minsk: Vyshejshaya Shkola Press; 1973 (in Russian).
|
Zavjalov EV, Shlyakhtin GV, Kapranova TA. Waterfowl and waterbirds of Saratov Region (Gaviformes, Podicipediformes, Pelicaniformes, Ciconiiformes, Phoenicopteriformes, Anseriformes). Berkut: Ukr Ornithol Mag. 1997;6:3-18 (in Russian).
|
Zavjalov EV, Shlyakhtin GV, Tabachishin VG, Yakushev NN, Khrustov IA. Birds of the northern part of Low Volga Basin. Book 1. Saratov: Saratov University Press; 2005 (in Russian).
|
Zhukov VS. Birds of Middle Siberia forest-steppe. Novosibirsk: Nauka; 2006 (in Russian).
|
Zubakin VA, Morozov VV, Kharitonov SP, Leonovich VV, Mischenko AL. The birds of the Moscow-river meadowland near Vinogradovo, Moscow Region. In: Flint VE, Tomkovich PS, editors. Birds of reclaiming territories. Moscow: Moscow University Press; 1998. p. 126-167 (in Russian).
|
1. | Shuyu Hou, Rui Yang, Yue Cao, et al. A framework for identifying bird conservation priority areas in croplands at national level. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 324: 116330. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116330 |
Winter | P | T | T% |
2003 | 290 | 0 | 0 |
2004 | 538 | 0 | 0 |
2005 | 585 | 0 | 0 |
2006 | 572 | 1 | 0.2 |
2007 | 331 | 0 | 0 |
2008 | 191 | 1 | 0.5 |
2009 | 241 | 0 | 0 |
2010 | 122 | 0 | 0 |
2011 | 205 | 0 | 0 |
2012 | 195 | 1 | 0.5 |
2013 | 52 | 0 | 0 |
The winter of 2003 corresponds to the one starting in December of 2003, and soon P, number of captures of pre-Saharan passerines; T, number of captures of transSaharan passerines; T%, percentage of captures of trans-Saharan passerines |
Models | AICc | ΔAICc | AICc weight |
Period: Oct–Nov. | |||
1. Year | 102.5 | 0.0 | 0.596 |
2. Year + Tmean | 105.7 | 3.2 | 0.122 |
Global | 119.6 | 17.1 | 0.000 |
Period: Dec–Jan. | |||
1. Year | 90.2 | 0.0 | 0.724 |
2. Year + Prec | 93.9 | 6.7 | 0.115 |
Global | 109.4 | 19.2 | 0.000 |
Period: Feb–Mar. | |||
1. Null | 111.0 | 0.0 | 0.293 |
2. Year | 111.5 | 0.5 | 0.223 |
3. Tmin | 111.6 | 0.6 | 0.210 |
Global | 128.2 | 17.2 | 0.000 |
Within each period, we show the list of models up to the first one with a ΔAICc > 2, and the global (saturated) model Year, linear effect of year; Tmean, mean temperature; Tmin, minimum temperature; Prec, precipitation; Null; null model with a constant intercept; AICc, small-sample size corrected Akaike values; ΔAICc, difference in relation to the Akaike value of the first model |