Difference in the percentage time spent under visual obstruction ± SE between Far Eastern Curlew (a) and Eurasian Curlew (b) in two different coastal habitats (S. salsa saltmarsh vs. mudflat) and seasons (spring vs. autumn)
Figures of the Article
- 
                    
                        
                    
                    
                        
                        Location of the study site on the northern region of the Yellow Sea, eastern coastal China
                        
                    
                 - 
                    
                        
                    
                    
                        
                        Difference in the percentage time spent under visual obstruction ± SE between Far Eastern Curlew (a) and Eurasian Curlew (b) in two different coastal habitats (S. salsa saltmarsh vs. mudflat) and seasons (spring vs. autumn)
                        
                    
                 - 
                    
                        
                    
                    
                        
                        Estimated marginal means (EMMs) ± SE for the linear mixed models for vigilance behaviour of Far Eastern Curlew (FEC) and Eurasian Curlew (EC). Data shown were ln-translated percentage of vigilance time (%) and vigilance frequency (/min). Post-hoc Tukey t-test were compared separately for each curlew species between habitat types, human disturbance and migration seasons. *** < 0.001; ** < 0.01; * < 0.05
                        
                    
                 - 
                    
                        
                    
                    
                        
                        Habitat-dependent variation in flock size (conspecific and heterospecific) and curlew vigilance behaviour (percentage of vigilance time, % and vigilance frequency/min) in S. salsa saltmarsh and adjacent mudflat
                        
                    
                 
Related articles
- 
            
            2025, 16(1): 100259. DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2025.100259
 - 
            
            2024, 15(1): 100157. DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2023.100157
 - 
            
            2022, 13(1): 100068. DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2022.100068
 - 
            
            2021, 12(1): 38. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-021-00272-7
 - 
            
            2021, 12(1): 36. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-021-00271-8
 - 
            
            2020, 11(1): 41. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-020-00228-3
 - 
            
            2020, 11(1): 24. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-020-00210-z
 - 
            
            2018, 9(1): 44. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-018-0137-2
 - 
            
            2017, 8(1): 20. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-017-0078-1
 - 
            
            2011, 2(3): 147-151. DOI: 10.5122/cbirds.2011.0020
 
    
Download:
            
            
                    
                    
                    
 
      
      
      
    
Email Alerts
RSS Feeds