Ru Jia, Tian Ma, Fengjiang Zhang, Guogang Zhang, Dongping Liu, Jun Lu. 2019: Population dynamics and habitat use of the Black-necked Crane (Grus nigricollis) in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin, Tibet, China. Avian Research, 10(1): 32. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-019-0170-9
Citation:
Ru Jia, Tian Ma, Fengjiang Zhang, Guogang Zhang, Dongping Liu, Jun Lu. 2019: Population dynamics and habitat use of the Black-necked Crane (Grus nigricollis) in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin, Tibet, China. Avian Research, 10(1): 32. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-019-0170-9
Ru Jia, Tian Ma, Fengjiang Zhang, Guogang Zhang, Dongping Liu, Jun Lu. 2019: Population dynamics and habitat use of the Black-necked Crane (Grus nigricollis) in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin, Tibet, China. Avian Research, 10(1): 32. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-019-0170-9
Citation:
Ru Jia, Tian Ma, Fengjiang Zhang, Guogang Zhang, Dongping Liu, Jun Lu. 2019: Population dynamics and habitat use of the Black-necked Crane (Grus nigricollis) in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin, Tibet, China. Avian Research, 10(1): 32. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-019-0170-9
The Black-necked Crane (Grus nigricollis) is an internationally threatened crane living on the plateau, mainly in winter, in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin in Tibet, western China. In the past five years, some economic development projects have been conducted in this area, posing potential threats to the wintering populations of the cranes and their habitats. Therefore, the current population dynamics of wintering Black-necked Cranes and habitat suitability in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin were investigated.
Methods
Twenty counties were surveyed using the line transect method in December 2017 and January 2018, and we recorded the location, flock size, number of individuals, habitat types and presence of human disturbance in which they occurred. We compared the results from the middle wintering period in this survey with those from 2014.
Results
The highest number of cranes recorded was 8291, and the results showed that the cranes were mainly distributed in Lhaze, Namling, Samzhubze, and Lhunzub. A total of 577 and 495 flocks were recorded in the early and middle wintering periods, respectively. In the early wintering period, there were significant differences in the number of individuals across the different habitats, with crop stubble land and plowed land representing more than 30% of the total habitat utilization. In the middle wintering period, there were also significant differences in the number of individuals, and the utilization of crop stubble land represented over 60% of the total.
Conclusions
Wintering Black-necked Cranes mainly fed on spilled grains in stubble habitat after harvest. In the middle wintering period, some of the farmlands were plowed and irrigated, which resulted in food shortages in these areas, and the cranes tended to gather in mixed flocks of large size instead of as a single family. There were still considerable regional wintering populations decreases in Quxu, Nedong, and Sakya in 2018 compared with 2014, and these decreases were mainly due to some recently emerging threats, including farmlands being converted into areas of greenhouse cultivation, highway and railway construction, river dredging, the rapid development of the manufacturing and mining industries, and the lack of protection of important wintering sites.
The Black-necked Crane (Grus nigricollis) is listed as a globally threatened species by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and is one of the most threatened cranes worldwide (Li 2014). Among the 15 known crane species, the Black-necked Crane is the only species that lives on plateaus year round. These cranes mainly breed on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in western China (Li et al. 2014; Zhang et al. 2014a, 2015), with another small breeding population in Ladakh (Chandan et al. 2014; Khan et al. 2014). They mainly winter in relatively low-altitude regions of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, such as the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin, and the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, such as Zhaotong in Yunnan Province and Weining in Guizhou Province (Gao et al. 2012; Ran et al. 2017), with small wintering populations in Bhutan (Phuntsho and Tshering 2014). There are approximately 10, 000-10, 200 Black-necked Cranes worldwide (Li 2014).
Because of the harsh natural conditions in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin (including the Lhasa and Nyangqu rivers), relatively few systematic bird surveys have been conducted in this area. However, the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Comprehensive Expedition Team from the Chinese Academy of Sciences has conducted bird surveys since the 1950s, and, until recently, a special census that targets Black-necked Cranes was carried out in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin. The counts from 2014 to 2016 showed increasing Black-necked Crane wintering populations sizes of approximately 5500-6500 individuals (Zhang et al. 2014b; Yang et al. 2016), which accounted for more than 50% of all Black-necked Cranes worldwide. The Yarlung Tsangpo River basin has become an important wintering ground for the populations of Black-necked Cranes.
In the past five years, some economic development projects have been implemented in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin, including the conversion of wetlands (lakes and rivers) into farmland and development zones, the conversion of farmland into areas containing greenhouses for vegetable cultivation, and the construction of expressways (Lhasa to Shigatse and Lhasa to Nyingchi) and railways (Lhasa to Shigatse), which inevitably destroy the local landscape and bring more human interference (Tsering et al. 2009; Li et al. 2011; Wu 2011; Wang et al. 2015). However, whether these activities pose threats to the wintering populations and habitats of Black-necked Cranes remains unknown. In this study, we determined the current population sizes and important locations for wintering Black-necked Cranes in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin and explored the habitat suitability by comparing habitat use between the different wintering stages. Moreover, we also discuss the negative effects of human activities on the wintering populations of Black-necked Cranes, which will contribute to the conservation of Black-necked Crane populations and their habitats in this area, and propose effective management measures to create more suitable habitats in different wintering periods for Black-necked Cranes in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin.
Methods
Survey time and areas
Wintering Black-necked Cranes usually arrive at the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin in mid-November, and the wintering populations reach a stable level in early December. The whole wintering period was divided into three stages: the early wintering period (from early to the end of December), the middle wintering period (from early to the end of January), and the late wintering period (from early to the end of February). Our surveys were conducted on 20-30 December 2017 and 20-30 January 2018, which represented the early and middle wintering periods, respectively. The surveyors were divided into west and east-route teams, with Quxu as the boundary between the two teams. Twenty counties were covered, and a total distance of approximately 1200 km was travelled from Lhaze to Sangri (Fig. 1).
Figure
1.
Survey areas of the Black-necked Crane wintering ground in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin in Tibet from December 2017 to January 2018. Major rivers are shown on the map, and location names are given in English, with Pinyin Chinese in parentheses: 1—Lhaze (Lazi), 2—Sakya (Sajia), 3—Thongmon (Xietongmen), 4—Samzhubze (Sangzhuzi), 5—Panam (Bailang), 6—Gyantse (Jiangzi), 7—Namling (Nanmulin), 8—Rinbung (Renbu), 9—Nyemo (Nimu), 10—Nakartse (Langkazi), 11—Quxu (Qushui), 12—Tolun Dechen (Duilongdeqing), 13—Lhasa (Lasa), 14—Taktse (Dazi), 15—Lhunzub (Linzhou), 16—Medro Gongkar (Mozhugongka), 17—Gonggar (Gongga), 18—Danang (Zhanang), 19—Nedong (Naidong), 20—Sangri (Sangri)
The survey routes, sites and members were the same between the two surveys. We used 10× binoculars to scan along the routes from 9:00 to 19:00 every day. When cranes were detected, they were observed and counted using a monocular scope (20-60×, SWAROVSKI, Austria), and we recorded the location, flock size, number of individuals, habitat types and presence of human disturbance, including mining development, road and railway construction, reclamation, river dredging, and presence of greenhouses for vegetable cultivation. To avoid double counting, we ignored flocks flying over from behind. A flock was defined as a group of two or more cranes in close proximity and interacting with each other (Bishop et al. 1998).
Agriculture is the dominant land use in this area. Winter wheat (Triticum spp.) is grown in winter (from the end of September to the following August), whereas other crops, including highland barley (Hordeum vulgare), potatoes (Solanum tuberosum), rapeseed (Brassica napus), and spring wheat (Triticum spp.), are grown from April to September and harvested in autumn. The local villagers usually plow the barley or spring wheat farmland after the crops are harvested, which occurs at different times. Therefore, we divided the major habitat types into winter wheat farmland, crop stubble land (including barley, rapeseed and spring wheat), plowed field, pasture, river, and marsh. When we analyzed the habitat use of Black-necked Cranes, we ignored flying individuals and flocks of the cranes.
To obtain the actual locations of each flock and individual crane, the positions of the observation sites were mapped with a GPS, and the distance between the cranes and surveyors was recorded using a laser range finder (ZEISS Victory 82 × 6 PRF). The direction from the cranes to the observers was measured with a compass, and then we determined the locations of the cranes in the ArcGIS software package (version 10.1, ESRI 2012, USA). We also visited local villagers to obtain information on agricultural cultivation, including crop species, farming time and farming system, and conducted field surveys of human disturbances to evaluate the current habitat conservation status.
Data analysis
A single family usually included 2-4 individuals with 1 or 2 adults and 1 or 2 chicks. To make statistics and analysis data more convenience, the mixed flocks, which means a combination of several Black-necked Crane families, were divided into four groups based on the numbers of cranes observed (5-10, 11-50, 51-100, and > 100).
We checked the data for normality, and variables whose residuals were not normally distributed were transformed before the analyses. A Chi-square test was used to analyze the significance of flock differences during the different wintering stages. One-way analysis of variance was used to identify differences in the numbers of individuals in the different habitat types. All tests were performed using the SPSS statistical software package (version 22.0, IBM 2013, USA). The data format was the mean±SD. In addition, to analyze the trend in the number of cranes over time in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin, we compared the results from the middle wintering period in this survey with those from the same period in 2014 (Zhang et al. 2014b).
Results
Distribution and population size
A total of 6260 Black-necked Cranes were recorded during the survey in the early wintering period (Table 1). The sites with the most cranes (> 1000 individuals) included Lhaze, Namling, and Samzhubze, followed by Lhunzub, Sakya, Thongmon, Taktse, and Gonggar (Table 1, Fig. 2a). In the middle wintering period, a total of 8291 Black-necked Cranes were recorded, which was an increase of 2031 cranes over that recorded during the early wintering period (Table 1). In terms of crane numbers, great increases were observed at Taktse, Lhunzub, Samzhubze and Lhaze between the different wintering periods, but great decreases were observed at Quxu, Gonggar, Gyantse, and Sakya (Table 1, Fig. 2b). Moreover, the number of cranes greatly declined in comparison to that recorded in 2014 at Quxu and Sakya (Table 1).
Table
1.
Black-necked Crane wintering population sizes in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin, Tibet
Figure
2.
Population size of Black-necked Cranes wintering in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin in Tibet from December 2017 to January 2018 (a: early wintering period, b: middle wintering period; the location names in this figure are the same as those in Fig. 1.)
In the early wintering period, a total of 577 flocks were recorded, with an average flock size of 10.4±22.2 cranes (n=577, range 2-185); in the middle wintering period, 495 flocks were recorded, with an average flock size of 14.6±31.2 cranes (n=495, range 2-238). The cranes tended to live in mixed flocks of larger sizes instead of as a single family in the middle wintering period (Fig. 3), and there was a significant decrease in the number of single families (χ2=16.03, p < 0.001, n=741) and a significant increase in the number of flocks with 11-50 individuals (χ2=6.25, p=0.013, n=155).
Figure
3.
Flock sizes of Black-necked Cranes during different wintering periods in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin, Tibet
In the early wintering period, there were significant differences in the number of individuals across the different habitats (F=3.634, p=0.003, n=566). Crop stubble land and plowed land showed relatively higher habitat suitability, and the numbers of individuals in these areas accounted for 37.6% and 34.2% of all observed cranes, respectively (Table 2).
Table
2.
Numbers of Black-necked Cranes in different habitats in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin, Tibet
Types
Early wintering period
Middle wintering period
Number of individuals
Number of flocks
Average flock size
Number of individuals
Number of flocks
Average flock size
Pasture
247 (4.2%)
13 (2.4%)
19.0±35.4
519 (7.5%)
40 (8.2%)
12.9±24.1
Winter wheat land
414 (6.9%)
24 (4.3%)
17.3±25.1
49 (0.7%)
14 (2.8%)
3.5±3.6
Plowed land
2025 (34.2%)
274 (44.7%)
7.4±17.7
771 (11.2%)
89 (18.3%)
9.3±24.4
River
581 (9.8%)
35 (6.3%)
16.6±30.6
1212 (17.6%)
84 (17.3%)
14.3±19.7
Crop stubble land
2230 (37.6%)
201 (36.3%)
11.1±22.3
4136 (60.2%)
245 (50.4%)
16.9±36.6
Marsh
429 (7.2%)
19 (3.4%)
22.6±39.9
189 (2.7%)
14 (2.9%)
13.5±24.2
The numbers in parentheses indicate the percentages
In the middle wintering period, there were also significant differences in the number of individuals in association with habitat use (F=2.249, p=0.048, n=486). The numbers of individuals recorded in the crop stubble land were relatively higher than those recorded in association with other habitats and accounted for 60.2% of all observed individuals, which indicated that cranes mainly used the crop stubble land over plowed land and other habitat types in the middle wintering period (Table 2).
Discussion
We recorded a maximum of 8291 individuals in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin during our surveys, which was a great increase of nearly 30% compared with the previous highest record in the region (6500 individuals) (Zhang et al. 2014b; Yang et al. 2016). Currently, there are eastern, central, and western wintering populations of Black-necked Cranes. Among them, the eastern populations (approximately 4300 cranes) winter in northeastern Yunnan and northwestern Guizhou (Li 2014; Yang and Zhang 2014), and the central populations (approximately 300 cranes) winter in northwestern Yunnan (Li 2014). The western populations winter in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin of Tibet and Bhutan, of which more than 550 cranes have been recorded in Bhutan (Phuntsho and Tshering 2014). Together with the 8291 cranes observed during this survey in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin, the western populations have been found to contain approximately 8700 cranes. Thus, the Black-necked Cranes in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin account for over 81.2% of all Black-necked Cranes worldwide.
Significant increase of wetland in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau may be an important reason for the increase in the number of cranes in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin. At the breeding sites of the cranes, such as Cuoe, Cuona and Mujiu lakes on the Qiangtang Plateau, northern Tibet (Zhang et al. 2015), the glaciers have shrunk because of climate warming, and the precipitation has increased (Li et al. 2017). All these factors make the wetland area in Tibet increased (Niu et al. 2012; Gong et al. 2019), which has provided more breeding sites for the cranes.
Compared with early wintering period in 2017 (6260 cranes), the number of individuals have increased significantly in middle wintering period in 2018 (8291 cranes), especially in Samzhubze where the population increased by 125%. Since the field methodologies, survey routes and surveyors were the same between the two surveys, the following two aspects should be concerned for the considerable increase of population numbers in middle wintering period: (1) in middle wintering period, numerous farmlands were plowed and irrigated which made cranes unavailable for feeding as covering of soil and ice. Therefore, the populations which were dispersed and difficult to record in early wintering period became more stable, concentration and easy to record in middle wintering period. (2) Although only a few Black-necked Cranes were recorded before 2014 (Li 2014), it was reported the number of cranes increased considerably outside the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin, especially in Nyingchi in recent years (Han and Guo 2018) Although further evidence is needed, it is likely that Nyingchi population of the cranes maybe disperse and aggregate at the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin in the middle wintering period due to the food shortage and so on.
Our results indicated that the Black-necked Cranes used different habitats in different wintering periods. In the Yarlung Tsangpo River area, farmland is the main foraging site for cranes (Song et al. 1994; Bishop and Li 2002), which indicates the long-term importance of farmland in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin for crane survival. Our field observations showed that the crop stubble in the highland barley land, spilled barley grains, low grass, and growing winter wheat were the main habitat used by the cranes, which was consistent with winter habitat use by Black-necked Cranes in Tibet (Bishop et al. 1998).
Our study revealed that in the middle wintering period, the cranes mainly used crop stubble land over plowed land as habitat sites, which was consistent with a study showing the use of cereal grains as a food resource by wintering Black-necked Cranes (Bishop and Li 2002). Because of the demands of agricultural farming and pest control, numerous farmlands are plowed and irrigated in the middle wintering period resulting in available food decrease as covering of soil and ice. As a result, cranes are rarely found in farmlands that have been plowed for a long time. Compared with the early wintering period, the distribution pattern of the cranes changed greatly inside of the surveyed counties. For example, inside Samzhubze, some areas of the highland barley land was plowed and irrigated in the middle wintering period, resulting many cranes aggregated other areas with highland barley farmland of Samzhubze, which also happened at Lhaze in the middle wintering period as well.
Although the crane populations generally increased, the numbers of cranes in Quxu, Taktse, Medro Gongkar, Nedong, and Sakya decreased compared with those found in 2014, especially in Quxu, Nedong, and Sakya, with great declined in the number of cranes (Table 1). This decreasing trend was generally consistent with the results of the survey conducted by Yang et al. (2016) in the same areas. In March 2018, we conducted an in-depth survey of Quxu, Nedong, and Sakya and found that there were five factors that adversely affected the Black-necked Crane populations and their habitats. (1) There were changes in farming patterns across the farmlands. Since 2013, Greenhouses have been recently constructed on some highland crop farmlands to grow melons and vegetables (Yang and Cangjue 2013), which is common in the eastern Yarlung Tsangpo River basin, especially in Quxu and Nedong. (2) Expressways were constructed from Lhasa to Nyingchi and to Shigatse, and these roads pass through the foraging sites at Quxu and Nedong. (3) Some important sites used by the Black-necked Cranes are not included in protected areas, such as those in Gonggar (approximately 200‒300 cranes), Danang (approximately 1‒20 cranes), and Nedong (approximately 100‒200 cranes), and human disturbances from economic development are relatively higher in these areas. (4) There has been rapid development of the mining industry in Sakya, resulting in an increase in human activities and industrial wastewater, deteriorating the water quality of the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin. (5) A dredging project in the Lhasa River and the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin directly destroyed the habitats of the cranes, especially the roost sites.
Based on the current conservation status of the wintering grounds of Black-necked Cranes in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin, we provide the following recommendations: (1) surveys on Black-necked Crane populations in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin should be conducted regularly, and a detailed field survey guide should be developed. (2) The development of projects associated with manufacturing, mining, and other human activities, such as reclamation and dredging, should be strictly prohibited or controlled in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin. (3) Communication and cooperation between the forestry and agricultural departments should be conducted to protect the wintering populations and habitats of Black-necked Cranes and to maintain the goals of agricultural development. (4) Because the water level has an important impact on Black-necked Cranes roost sites, the local water resource department should strengthen the management of the water level of the Lhasa River, Nyangqu River valley, and Yarlung Tsangpo River to meet the water level requirements of the cranes. (5) Some Black-necked Cranes distribution sites, such as those in Gonggar, Danang, and Nedong, are not currently included in protected areas and should be protected at the national level.
Conclusions
We recorded a maximum of 8291 Black-necked Cranes in our surveys in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin, which was a great increase of nearly 30% compared with the previous highest record in the region. Wetlands change may be an important reason for the increase in the numbers of cranes in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin. In addition, the comparison of the Black-necked Crane populations numbers and distributions during the two wintering periods showed that the cranes rarely selected plowed land for foraging sites in the middle wintering period, mainly using crop stubble land. There were considerable regional wintering population decreases in Quxu, Nedong, and Sakya in 2018 compared with 2014, and these decreases were mainly due to some recently emerging threats, including farmlands being converted into areas of greenhouse cultivation, highway and railway construction, river dredging, the rapid development of the manufacturing and mining industries, and the lack of protection of important wintering sites.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Forestry and Grassland Department of Tibet Autonomous Region who gave us great supports during our investigations.
Authors' contributions
RJ and TM prepared and revised the manuscript. GZ and DL conceived and designed the research. FZ, TM, GZ, DL and JL performed the field work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
The data and materials used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The investigations comply with the current laws of China in which they were performed.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Bishop MA, Li FS. Effects of farming practices in Tibet on wintering Black-necked Crane (Grus nigricollis) diet and food availability. Biodivers Sci. 2002;10:393-8 (in Chinese).
Bishop MA, Cangjue ZM, Song YL, Harkness J, Gu BY. Winter habitat use by black-necked cranes Grus nigricollis in Tibet. Wildfowl. 1998;49:228-41.
Chandan P, Khan A, Takpa J, Hussain SA, Mehdi K, Jamwal PS, et al. Status and distribution of Black-necked Crane (Grus nigricollis) in India. Zool Res. 2014;35:39-50.
Gao XG, Wang L, Sang ZL, Tian H, Wang SM, Liu JJ. Relationship between the population dynamics and their habitat change of the wintering Black-Necked Crane in Dashanbao. J Nat Sci Hunan Normal Univ. 2012;35:70-3 (in Chinese).
Gong P, Liu H, Zhang MN, Li CC, Wang J, Huang HB, et al. Stable classification with limited sample: transferring a 30-m resolution sample set collected in 2015 to mapping 10-m resolution global land cover in 2017. Sci Bull. 2019;64:370-3.
Han XS, Guo YM. Model analysis for the potential threat to the wintering habitats of the black-necked crane (Grus nigricollis) in Nyingchi, Tibet. Chin J Wildlife. 2018;39(3):539-49.
Khan A, Chandan P, Takpa J, Hussain SA, Rattan R, Jamwal PS, et al. Diurnal time budget of breeding Black-necked Crane (Grus nigricollis) in Changthang, Ladakh, India. Zool Res. 2014;35:158-66.
Li FS. IUCN Black-necked Crane (Grus nigricollis) conservation plan. Zool Res. 2014;35:3-9 (in Chinese).
Li FS, Bishop MA, Drolma T. Power line strikes by Black-necked Cranes and bar-headed geese in tibet autonomous region. Chin Birds. 2011;2:167-73.
Li JR, Cao J, Yang F, Li Z, Wang W, Li LX. Distribution and conservation status of Black-necked Crane (Grus nigricollis) in Qinghai, China: a review. Zool Res. 2014;35:76-9 (in Chinese).
Li LH, Liu QH, Zhang YL, Liu LS, Ding MJ, Gu CJ. Spatial distribution and variation of precipitation in the Qiangtang Plateau. Geogr Res. 2017;36:2047-60 (in Chinese).
Niu ZG, Zhang HY, Wang XW, Yao WB, Zhou DM, Zhao KY, et al. Mapping wetland changes in China between 1978 and 2008. Chin Sci Bull. 2012;57:2813-23.
Phuntsho T, Tshering J. Black-necked Crane (Grus nigricollis) in Bhutan: current population status and conservation initiatives. Zool Res. 2014;35:10-9.
Ran JC, Meng WP, Li HJ, Zhang MM. The impact of environmental problems on Black-necked Crane (Grus nigricollis) and the management strategies at Caohai Wetland, Guizhou, China. Chin J Wildl. 2017;38:35-9 (in Chinese).
Song YL, Bishop MA, Tsamchu D. Overwintering population quantity and distribution of Bar-headed Goose in the middle reaches of Yarlung Zangbo River, Tibet. Chin J Zool. 1994;29:27-30 (in Chinese).
Tsering, Benba D, Lagdor, Basang, Pubu. Relationship between wintering habitat protection of the Black-necked Crane and local agricultural activities. J Tibet Univ. 2009;24:1-7 (in Chinese).
Wang YK, Tao JP, Liu FG, Zhang YL, Chen Q. Reconstruction of cropland spatial pattern in 1830 in the middle reaches of Yarlung Zangbo River Valley. Geogr Res. 2015;34:2355-67 (in Chinese).
Wu Y. Based on the environmental impact assessment of ecological behavior analysis. Railw Energy Sav Environ Protect Occup Saf Health. 2011;1:200-5 (in Chinese).
Yang L, Cangjue ZM. Effective ways to precipitate the coordinated development of black-necked cranes (Grus nigricollis) conservation and agricultural production in middle reaches of Yarlung Zangbo river natural reserve. Tibet J Agric Sci. 2013;35:45-8 (in Chinese).
Yang F, Zhang YQ. Quantities and distributions of the Black-necked Crane (Grus nigricollis) and other large waterfowls on the Yunnan and Guizhou Plateau. Zool Res. 2014;35:80-5.
Yang L, Li J-R, Tsamchu D. Number and distribution of wintering Black-necked Crane (Grus nigricollis) in drainage area of Yarlung Zangbo river and its two branches from Tibet China. J Northeast For Univ. 2016;44:70-2 (in Chinese).
Zhang LX, Shu ML, An B, Suo YL, Se YJ, Dabu XLT, et al. Number and distribution of the Black-necked Cranes (Grus nigricollis) in Yanchiwan National Nature Reserve, Gansu, China. Zool Res. 2014a;35:117-23 (in Chinese).
Zhang GG, Liu DP, Li FS, Qian FW, Ma T, Dan D. Species and populations of waterbirds wintering in the Yarlung Zangbo and its tributaries in Tibet, China. Zool Res. 2014b;35:92-100.
Zhang GG, Liu DP, Jiang HX, Zhang KJ, Zhao HD, Kang AL, et al. Abundance and conservation of waterbirds breeding on the Changtang Plateau, Tibet Autonomous Region, China. Waterbirds. 2015;38:19-29.
Sarah Schmid, Diego A Hartasánchez, Wan-Ting Huang, et al. Genomic Architecture of the Clownfish Hybrid Amphiprion leucokranos. Genome Biology and Evolution, 2025, 17(3)
DOI:10.1093/gbe/evaf031
2.
Farooq Omar Al-Ajli, Giulio Formenti, Olivier Fedrigo, et al. Chromosome-level reference genome assembly of the gyrfalcon (Falco rusticolus) and population genomics offer insights into the falcon population in Mongolia. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15(1)
DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-88216-9
3.
A. P. Kryukov, O. A. Goroshko. Breeding success of the interspecies hybrids: Reduced fertility in the hybridogeneous magpie population (<i>Pica pica</i> × <i>Pica serica</i>, Aves). Žurnal obŝej biologii, 2024, 85(4): 332.
DOI:10.31857/S0044459624040054
4.
Dezhi Zhang, Huishang She, Shangyu Wang, et al. Phylogenetic Conflict Between Species Tree and Maternally Inherited Gene Trees in a Clade of Emberiza Buntings (Aves: Emberizidae). Systematic Biology, 2024, 73(2): 279.
DOI:10.1093/sysbio/syad078
5.
Andrew N Black, Andrew J Mularo, Jong Yoon Jeon, et al. Discordance between taxonomy and population genomic data: An avian example relevant to the United States Endangered Species Act. PNAS Nexus, 2024, 3(8)
DOI:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae298
6.
Sajid Mahmood, Mian Sayed Khan, Zaib Ullah, et al. The origin of genetic diversity of indigenous cockfighting chickens of Pakistan by analyzing the mtDNA. Heliyon, 2024, 10(6): e27755.
DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27755
7.
Kira M Long, Angel G Rivera-Colón, Kevin F P Bennett, et al. Ongoing introgression of a secondary sexual plumage trait in a stable avian hybrid zone. Evolution, 2024, 78(9): 1539.
DOI:10.1093/evolut/qpae076
8.
Jente Ottenburghs, Kati Moore, Jason Wolf. Digest: Asymmetrical introgression of belly coloration across a manakin hybrid zone in Panama. Evolution, 2024, 78(9): 1633.
DOI:10.1093/evolut/qpae096
9.
Jente Ottenburghs, Johanna Honka, Marja E. Heikkinen, et al. Highly differentiated loci resolve phylogenetic relationships in the Bean Goose complex. BMC Ecology and Evolution, 2023, 23(1)
DOI:10.1186/s12862-023-02103-3
10.
Philip Lavretsky, Jonathon E. Mohl, Pär Söderquist, et al. The meaning of wild: Genetic and adaptive consequences from large-scale releases of domestic mallards. Communications Biology, 2023, 6(1)
DOI:10.1038/s42003-023-05170-w
11.
Mark S Hibbins, Matthew W Hahn, M Turelli. Phylogenomic approaches to detecting and characterizing introgression. Genetics, 2022, 220(2)
DOI:10.1093/genetics/iyab173
12.
James K Schull, Yatish Turakhia, James A Hemker, et al. Champagne: Automated Whole-Genome Phylogenomic Character Matrix Method Using Large Genomic Indels for Homoplasy-Free Inference. Genome Biology and Evolution, 2022, 14(3)
DOI:10.1093/gbe/evac013
13.
Alexey P. Kryukov, Oleg A. Goroshko, Vladimir Y. Arkhipov, et al. Introgression at the emerging secondary contact zone of magpie Pica pica subspecies (Aves: Corvidae): integrating data on nuclear and mitochondrial markers, vocalizations, and field observations. Organisms Diversity & Evolution, 2022, 22(4): 1037.
DOI:10.1007/s13127-022-00568-6
14.
Florentine Riquet, Aurélien Japaud, Flávia L. D. Nunes, et al. Complex spatial patterns of genetic differentiation in the Caribbean mustard hill coral Porites astreoides. Coral Reefs, 2022, 41(3): 813.
DOI:10.1007/s00338-021-02157-z
15.
Théo Tricou, Eric Tannier, Damien M de Vienne, et al. Ghost Lineages Highly Influence the Interpretation of Introgression Tests. Systematic Biology, 2022, 71(5): 1147.
DOI:10.1093/sysbio/syac011
16.
Nicholas R. Minor, Paul J. Dougherty, Scott A. Taylor, et al. Estimating hybridization in the wild using citizen science data: A path forward. Evolution, 2022, 76(2): 362.
DOI:10.1111/evo.14392
17.
V. A. Komarova, L. A. Lavrenchenko. Approaches to the Detection of Hybridization Events and Genetic Introgression upon Phylogenetic Incongruence. Biology Bulletin Reviews, 2022, 12(3): 240.
DOI:10.1134/S2079086422030045
18.
Michael J. Andersen, Jenna M. McCullough, Ethan F. Gyllenhaal, et al. Complex histories of gene flow and a mitochondrial capture event in a nonsister pair of birds. Molecular Ecology, 2021, 30(9): 2087.
DOI:10.1111/mec.15856
19.
Prateek Dey, Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, Indrani Sarkar, et al. Complete mitogenome of endemic plum-headed parakeet Psittacula cyanocephala – characterization and phylogenetic analysis. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16(4): e0241098.
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0241098
20.
Jente Ottenburghs, Keyi Geng, Alexander Suh, et al. Genome Size Reduction and Transposon Activity Impact tRNA Gene Diversity While Ensuring Translational Stability in Birds. Genome Biology and Evolution, 2021, 13(4)
DOI:10.1093/gbe/evab016
21.
Jente Ottenburghs. An evidence-based overview of hybridization in tinamous. Ornithology Research, 2021, 29(2): 113.
DOI:10.1007/s43388-021-00049-y
22.
Paulo Pulgarín-R, Martha Olivera-Angel, Luisa Ortíz, et al. DNA barcodes of birds from northern Colombia. Biodiversity Data Journal, 2021, 9
DOI:10.3897/BDJ.9.e64842
23.
Kritika M. Garg, Balaji Chattopadhyay. Gene Flow in Volant Vertebrates: Species Biology, Ecology and Climate Change. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science, 2021, 101(2): 165.
DOI:10.1007/s41745-021-00239-z
24.
Jente Ottenburghs. The genic view of hybridization in the Anthropocene. Evolutionary Applications, 2021, 14(10): 2342.
DOI:10.1111/eva.13223
25.
Dezhi Zhang, Frank E Rheindt, Huishang She, et al. Most Genomic Loci Misrepresent the Phylogeny of an Avian Radiation Because of Ancient Gene Flow. Systematic Biology, 2021, 70(5): 961.
DOI:10.1093/sysbio/syab024
26.
Ingrid Corasí Ortiz González, Ramón E. Rivera-Vicéns, Nikolaos V. Schizas. Description of four Millepora spp. transcriptomes and their potential to delimit the Caribbean fire coral species. Marine Genomics, 2021, 59: 100863.
DOI:10.1016/j.margen.2021.100863
27.
Philip Lavretsky, Robert E. Wilson, Sandra L. Talbot, et al. Phylogenomics reveals ancient and contemporary gene flow contributing to the evolutionary history of sea ducks (Tribe Mergini). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2021, 161: 107164.
DOI:10.1016/j.ympev.2021.107164
28.
Vicente de J. Castillo-Chora, Luz E. Zamudio-Beltrán, Carmen Pozo, et al. Phylogeography of Habia fuscicauda (Cardinalidae) indicates population isolation, genetic divergence and demographic changes during the Quaternary climate shifts in the Mesoamerican rainforest. Journal of Ornithology, 2021, 162(4): 961.
DOI:10.1007/s10336-021-01904-x
29.
Liviu G. Pârâu, Michael Wink. Common patterns in the molecular phylogeography of western palearctic birds: a comprehensive review. Journal of Ornithology, 2021, 162(4): 937.
DOI:10.1007/s10336-021-01893-x
30.
Mahendra Mariadassou, Marie Suez, Sanbadam Sathyakumar, et al. Unraveling the history of the genus Gallus through whole genome sequencing. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2021, 158: 107044.
DOI:10.1016/j.ympev.2020.107044
31.
José Fernando Pacheco, Luís Fábio Silveira, Alexandre Aleixo, et al. Annotated checklist of the birds of Brazil by the Brazilian Ornithological Records Committee—second edition. Ornithology Research, 2021, 29(2): 94.
DOI:10.1007/s43388-021-00058-x
32.
Elisa C. Henderson, Alan Brelsford. Genomic differentiation across the speciation continuum in three hummingbird species pairs. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 2020, 20(1)
DOI:10.1186/s12862-020-01674-9
33.
Kerensa McElroy, Andrew Black, Gaynor Dolman, et al. Robbery in progress: Historical museum collections bring to light a mitochondrial capture within a bird species widespread across southern Australia, the Copperback Quail‐thrush Cinclosoma clarum. Ecology and Evolution, 2020, 10(13): 6785.
DOI:10.1002/ece3.6403
34.
Joseph A. Tobias, Jente Ottenburghs, Alex L. Pigot. Avian Diversity: Speciation, Macroevolution, and Ecological Function. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2020, 51(1): 533.
DOI:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110218-025023
35.
Jente Ottenburghs. Ghost Introgression: Spooky Gene Flow in the Distant Past. BioEssays, 2020, 42(6)
DOI:10.1002/bies.202000012
36.
Jente Ottenburghs. Digest: Avian genomes are permeable to introgression for a few million years*. Evolution, 2020, 74(5): 1010.
DOI:10.1111/evo.13968
37.
Jente Ottenburghs, Johanna Honka, Gerard J. D. M. Müskens, et al. Recent introgression between Taiga Bean Goose and Tundra Bean Goose results in a largely homogeneous landscape of genetic differentiation. Heredity, 2020, 125(1-2): 73.
DOI:10.1038/s41437-020-0322-z
38.
Toni Gabaldón. Patterns and impacts of nonvertical evolution in eukaryotes: a paradigm shift. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2020, 1476(1): 78.
DOI:10.1111/nyas.14471
39.
Raman Akinyanju Lawal, Simon H. Martin, Koen Vanmechelen, et al. The wild species genome ancestry of domestic chickens. BMC Biology, 2020, 18(1)
DOI:10.1186/s12915-020-0738-1
40.
Kin Onn Chan, Carl R. Hutter, Perry L. Wood, et al. Larger, unfiltered datasets are more effective at resolving phylogenetic conflict: Introns, exons, and UCEs resolve ambiguities in Golden-backed frogs (Anura: Ranidae; genus Hylarana). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2020, 151: 106899.
DOI:10.1016/j.ympev.2020.106899
41.
Annika Mae Lamb, Anders Gonçalves da Silva, Leo Joseph, et al. Pleistocene-dated biogeographic barriers drove divergence within the Australo-Papuan region in a sex-specific manner: an example in a widespread Australian songbird. Heredity, 2019, 123(5): 608.
DOI:10.1038/s41437-019-0206-2
42.
Kritika M Garg, Katerina Sam, Balaji Chattopadhyay, et al. Gene Flow in the Müllerian Mimicry Ring of a Poisonous Papuan Songbird Clade (Pitohui; Aves). Genome Biology and Evolution, 2019, 11(8): 2332.
DOI:10.1093/gbe/evz168
43.
Josefin Stiller, Guojie Zhang. Comparative Phylogenomics, a Stepping Stone for Bird Biodiversity Studies. Diversity, 2019, 11(7): 115.
DOI:10.3390/d11070115
44.
Ashlee Shipham, Leo Joseph, Daniel J. Schmidt, et al. Dissection by genomic and plumage variation of a geographically complex hybrid zone between two Australian non-sister parrot species, Platycercus adscitus and Platycercus eximius. Heredity, 2019, 122(4): 402.
DOI:10.1038/s41437-018-0127-5
45.
Devon A DeRaad, James M Maley, Whitney L E Tsai, et al. Phenotypic clines across an unstudied hybrid zone in Woodhouse’s Scrub-Jay (Aphelocoma woodhouseii). The Auk, 2019, 136(2)
DOI:10.1093/auk/uky018
46.
Jente Ottenburghs. Digest: White‐eye birds provide possible answer to the paradox of the great speciator*. Evolution, 2019, 73(8): 1681.
DOI:10.1111/evo.13814
47.
Abhimanyu Lele, Jente Ottenburghs. Digest: A single genetic origin and a role for bone development pathways in repeated losses of flight in steamer ducks*. Evolution, 2019, 73(9): 2030.
DOI:10.1111/evo.13827
Jente Ottenburghs. Exploring the hybrid speciation continuum in birds. Ecology and Evolution, 2018, 8(24): 13027.
DOI:10.1002/ece3.4558
50.
J. Albert C. Uy, Darren E. Irwin, Michael S. Webster. Behavioral Isolation and Incipient Speciation in Birds. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2018, 49(1): 1.
DOI:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617-062646
51.
Arild Husby, S. Eryn McFarlane, Anna Qvarnström. Avian Genomics in Ecology and Evolution.
DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-16477-5_9
DownLoad:
Email Alerts
RSS Feeds