Processing math: 100%
Herman L Mays Jr, Bailey D McKay, Dieter Thomas Tietze, Cheng-Te Yao, Lindsey N Miller, Kathleen N Moreland, Fumin Lei. 2015: A multilocus molecular phylogeny for the avian genus Liocichla (Passeriformes: Leiothrichidae: Liocichla). Avian Research, 6(1): 17. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-015-0025-y
Citation: Herman L Mays Jr, Bailey D McKay, Dieter Thomas Tietze, Cheng-Te Yao, Lindsey N Miller, Kathleen N Moreland, Fumin Lei. 2015: A multilocus molecular phylogeny for the avian genus Liocichla (Passeriformes: Leiothrichidae: Liocichla). Avian Research, 6(1): 17. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-015-0025-y

A multilocus molecular phylogeny for the avian genus Liocichla (Passeriformes: Leiothrichidae: Liocichla)

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Herman L Mays Jr, maysh@marshall.edu

  • Received Date: 17 Feb 2015
  • Accepted Date: 20 Jul 2015
  • Available Online: 24 Apr 2022
  • Publish Date: 04 Aug 2015
  • Background 

    Historically the babblers have been assigned to the family Timaliidae but several recent studies have attempted to rest the taxonomy of this diverse passerine assemblage on a more firm evolutionary footing. The result has been a major rearrangement of the group. A well-supported and comprehensive phylogeny for this widespread avian group is an important part of testing evolutionary and biogeographic hypotheses, especially in Asia where the babblers are a key component of many forest ecosystems. However, the genus Liocichla is poorly represented in these prior studies of babbler systematics.

    Methods 

    We used a multilocus molecular genetic approach to generate a phylogenetic hypothesis for all five currently recognized species in the avian genus Liocichla. Multilocus DNA sequence data was used to construct individual gene trees using maximum likelihood and species trees were estimated from gene trees using Bayesian analyses. Divergence dates were obtained using a molecular clock approach.

    Results 

    Molecular data estimate a probable window of time for the origin for the Liocichla from the mid to late Miocene, between 5.55 and 12.87 Ma. Despite plumage similarities between the insular Taiwan endemic, L. steerii, and the continental L. bugunorum and L. omeiensis, molecular data suggest that L. steerii is the sister taxon to all continental Liocichla. The continental Liocichla are comprised of two lineages; a lineage containing L. omeiensis and L. bugunorum and a lineage comprised of L. phoenicea and L. ripponi. The comparatively early divergence of L. steerii within the Liocichla may be illusory due to extinct and therefore unsampled lineages. L. ripponi and L. phoenicea are parapatric with a Pleistocene split (0.07-1.88 Ma) occurring between an Eastern Himalayan L. phoenicea and a Northern Indochina distributed L. ripponi. L. bugunorum and L. omeiensis underwent a similar split between the Eastern Himalaya (L. bugunorum) and Central China (L. omeiensis) divided by the Hengduan Mountains.

    Conclusions 

    This study supports an origin of the Liocichla occurring sometime prior to the Miocene-Pliocene boundary, a period of significant climatic upheaval in Asia. The biogeographical patterns within the Liocichla mirror those of other birds in the region and allude to common geological and climatic drivers of avian diversification in Asia.

  • Galliformes are ground-living birds, an order consisting of around 280 species worldwide (Chen, 2014). This group of birds is found to have around 23 species listed as endangered and 6 as critically endangered in the IUCN red list (The World Conservation Union 2010). Phylogenetic relationships among species have been widely studied in recent years (Crowe et al., 2006; Frank-Hoeflich et al., 2007; Hugall and Stuart-Fox, 2012). Although current phylogenetic information is still limited and does not cover the systematics and affinities of all 280 Galliformes, a recent investigation has established a phylogeny of Galliformes for up to 197 species (Hugall and Stuart-Fox, 2012), accounting for over 70% of global Galliformes.

    Macro-evolutionary patterns of this large-size and attractive-appearance bird assemblage might be initiated by utilizing the available phylogenetic affinity information of the 197 species (Hugall and Stuart-Fox, 2012). The proposal to study macro-evolutionary patterns of Galliformes is to reveal in a more comprehensive way the extinction mechanism of this species assemblage from a long-term evolutionary perspective, for the purpose of better conserving them. In the present study, several macro-evolutionary attributes relevant to the phylogeny and diversity of Galliformes are considered.

    In first instance, clade age has been thought to link up with species richness. The relationship between clade age and species richness is one of recent interest in macro-evolutionary studies (Rabosky et al., 2012; Rabosky and Adams, 2012). Clade age has been thought to relate to species richness because of the fact that older clades could have more time to diversify (McPeek and Brown, 2007; Etienne et al., 2012), implying that the older the age of the clade, the higher its richness, resulting in a positive clade age-species richness relationship. However, whether such a relationship is universal is still controversial. Several previous studies have shown that clade age could predict species richness (McPeek and Brown, 2007; Etienne et al., 2012), while others argued that there is no clear relationship between clade age and species diversity (Rabosky et al., 2012). In the present study, I wanted to test whether there is a relationship between the evolutionary age of the ancestors of Galliformes and the number of their externally living descendants.

    Secondly, a shifting pattern in the rate of diversification has been broadly observed in many taxa, by showing patterns in which this rate is initially high but decreases over time (Rabosky and Lovette, 2008a, 2008b). Such a declining-diversification model is predicted by adaptive evolution (Schluter, 2000), because openings of new vacant niches are limited. Filling vacant niches would have been accomplished at an early evolutionary time, leading to a decline in the rate of diversification of species (Rabosky and Lovette, 2008b).

    Finally, the size of their range might be related to the rate of diversification of species (Chen, 2013), since range size of a species is a trait jointly affected by species dispersal, colonization and reproduction. The importance of geographic isolation in shaping speciation has been debated for a long time (Fitzpatrick and Turelli, 2006). A phylogenetic comparative method, referred to as "age-range correlation", is introduced to quantify the relative importance of sympatric and allopatric speciation on structuring contemporary species diversity patterns (Fitzpatrick and Turelli, 2006; Bolnick and Fitzpatrick, 2007).

    Considerable progress has been made in the development of robust statistical methods to infer ancestral ranges by incorporating a variety of biological processes. For example, a dispersal-extinction-cladogenesis model (DEC) has been proposed to estimate explicitly and infer historical changing patterns of ancestral ranges of species when projected on the phylogeny under a maximum likelihood framework (Ree et al., 2005; Ree and Smith, 2008). In addition to maximum likelihood-based methods for reconstructing ancestral distributional ranges, traditional methods are derived from the parsimony principle. Dispersal-vicariance analysis (DIVA) (Ronquist, 1997) and some of its extensions (for example, statistical DIVA (S-DIVA), Yu et al., 2010) are built on parsimony algorithms and still widely cited in current literature of phylogeographic studies (Ali et al., 2012). Recently, a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method has been proposed by Yu et al. (2013).

    The ancestral ranges of the Galliformes group were estimated by utilizing the well-established phylogenetic tree for 197 Galliformes (Hugall and Stuart-Fox, 2012). The following terrestrial regions are considered in biogeographical analyses: East Asia (A), South Asia (B), Southeast Asia (C), West Asia (D), North America (E), South America (F), Africa (G), Europe (H) and Oceania (I). Distribution of each species over these terrestrial regions was obtained from the Avibase database (http://avibase.bsc-eoc.org/avibase.jsp?lang=EN).

    In comparing ancestral ranges of Galliformes species, three analytical methods are used, i.e., dispersal-vicariance analysis (DIVA), Bayesian binary MCMC analysis (BBM) and dispersal-extinction-cladogenesis analysis (DEC). All three methods are carried out by using the software RASP (Yu et al., 2010, 2011).

    Different diversification rate-shifting models have been tried to fit the Galliformes phylogeny, as proposed in previous studies (Rabosky, 2006b; Rabosky and Lovette, 2008a, 2008b). Specifically, four methods from an R package "laser" (Rabosky, 2006a) are implemented for comparative purposes, consisting of a constant-speciation and constant-extinction model (CONSTANT), a decreasing-speciation and constant-extinction model (SPVAR), a constant-speciation and increasing-extinction model (EXVAR) and a decreasing-speciation and increasing-extinction model (BOTHVAR) (Chen, 2013). These four models have been used to test the temporal shifting patterns in rates of diversification of different taxa (Rabosky and Lovette, 2008a, 2008b).

    Each of the models require four parameters for estimation (Rabosky and Lovette, 2008b), which can be obtained by maximizing the following likelihood equation (Rabosky, 2006b):

    L(t|λ(t),μ(t))=N1n=2n(λ(t)μ(t))exp{n(λ(t)μ(t))(tntn+1)}×{1μ(t)λ(t)exp((λ(t)μ(t))tn+1)}n1{1μ(t)λ(t)exp((λ(t)μ(t))tn)}n
    (1)

    where t is the vector of observed branch times from the phylogeny, tn the branch time for the lineage, while n, λ(t) and μ(t) are time-dependent speciation and extinction rates, respectively. The time-dependent rate of diversification is defined as r(t)=λ(t)-μ(t) and N is the number of external tips in the tree.

    In the CONSTANT model, λ(t) and μ(t) are assumed to be constant over the entire phylogenetic tree (i.e., λ(t) = λ0, μ(t) = μ0), where λ0 and μ0 are the constants to be estimated. In the SPVAR model, μ(t) is assumed to be constant over the entire tree (i.e., μ(t) = μ0), while λ(t) is assumed to decrease continuously from the root to the tips of the tree, defined as follows: λ(t)=λ0 exp(-kt). As seen in the SPVAR model, the additional parameter k is required to model the declining trend of rate of speciation over the tree. For this model, the rate of diversification is predicted to decline over the evolutionary time as (r(t)=λ0 exp(-kt)-μ0). In the EXVAR model, the rate of speciation is assumed to be constant over the tree while the rate of extinction is assumed to decline over the tree as follows: u(t)=u0(1-exp(-zt)). As well, this model has an additional parameter, i.e., z, to be estimated. Finally, in the BOTHVAR model, both λ(t) and μ(t) are assumed to change over time as follows: λ(t)=λ0 exp(-kt) and u(t)=u0(1-exp(-zt)) (Rabosky, 2006b; Rabosky and Lovette, 2008b).

    The evolutionary age for each clade is calculated as the phylogenetic distance between the root and the internal node leading to the focused clade. The corresponding clade species richness is defined as the number of external tips (living species) for that specific clade.

    To reveal the possible relationship between clade age and clade species richness and/or phylogenetic diversity, I performed both a non-phylogenetic ordinary least-squares regression analysis (OLS) and a phylogenetic general least-squares regression analysis (PGLS). Given that various clades are not independent from each other, it is necessary to remove the impacts of phylogenetic inertia by performing PGLS, i.e., a method to introduce a phylogenetic variance-covariance matrix in the fitting formula, a matrix missing in the OLS method. For the OLS method, the vector of coefficients is fitted using the following identity:

    ˆβOLS=(XTX)1XTy
    (2)

    while for the PGLS method, the vector of coefficients is estimated from the following equation:

    ˆβPGLS=(XTW1X)1XTW1y
    (3)

    The superscript T denotes the transpose of a matrix, while -1 denotes the inverse of a matrix. X is a matrix with columns indicating the explanatory variables, while y is a column vector storing the values for the response variable and W is the phylogenetic variance-covariance matrix. The calculation of W is only related to the branch lengths of the phylogenetic tree (Revell, 2010).

    Both the Bayesian and maximum likelihood methods (BBI and Lagrange) identified SE Asia as the most likely origin of the distribution of the most common ancestor for all Galliformes species. The S-DIVA method failed to run because of unknown errors (out of memory when using RASP software).

    Because BBI and Lagrange share some levels of similarity, ancestral ranges estimated by Lagrange are the focus in the subsequent biogoegraphic discussion (Figure 1). As seen, a number of dispersal and vicariance events have occurred in the distribution of Galliformes species.

    Figure  1.  Ancestral range reconstruction of Galliformes with color legends using Lagrange maximum likelihood method.
    Codes for terrestrial regions: E Asia (A), S Asia (B), SE Asia (C), W Asia (D), N America (E), S America (F), Africa (G), Europe (H) and Oceania (I).

    At root node 393 (Figure 1), the most likely ancestral range is SE Asia and N America with a marginal probability of 29% (light orange color, symbol: CE). One vicariance event is identified, in which the Galliformes lineages in N America and SE Asia are separated in subsequent evolutionary times.

    For the lineages distributed in N America, in later times at node 378 (Figure 1), two dispersal events occurred. Starting from N America, one ancestral lineage dispersed to S America (node 233, Figure 1, light blue color, symbol: EF) while another dispersed to Africa (node 377, Figure 1, purple color, symbol: EG). Again some time later (node 366), some lineages dispersed to E Asia (blue color, symbol: A).

    For the lineage distributed in SE Asia at the root (Figure 1), it continued to inhabit that region and later underwent local radiation up until our contemporary era. During some evolutionary time points at nodes 391 and 389, some ancestral lineages of Galliformes dispersed to Oceania (green color, symbol: Ⅰ), leading to the contemporary distribution of Alectura lathami and Leipoa ocellata in Australia, Megapodius pritchardii in Tonga and Megapodius layardi in Vanuatu.

    No significant diversification rate-shifting pattern is evident in Galliformes phylogeny. As shown by the comparison of different diversification models, the constant-rate model received the lowest AIC value (-621.62, Table 1) and thus became the best model.

    Table  1.  A comparison of different time-dependent diversification models for fitting the Galliformes phylogeny
    Model CONSTANT SPVAR EXVAR BOTHVAR
    Likelihood 312.81 312.69 312.81 312.63
    AIC -621.62 -619.38 -619.61 -617.27
    Parameters
    λ0 0.174 0.193 0.1 85 0.186
    μ0 0.064 0.014 0.011 0.001
    K - 0.001 - 0.001
    Z - 1.003 0.078
    The best-fitted model is marked in boldface.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    There is a significant and positive relationship between clade age and Galliformes species richness (Figure 2), regardless of whether the situation or whether phylogenetic inertia is controlled or not. For the OLS, the fitted equation of clade richness=1.24×clade age-8.29 (p < 0.05), while for the PGLS, the best fitted equation of clade richness=3.111 × clade age-101.48 (p < 0.05). This supports the prediction that older clades process higher species diversity since they have more time to diversify.

    Figure  2.  Clade age-richness relationships.
    The black fitted line indicated the result from ordinary least-squares regression analysis (OLS), while the red line is from the phylogenetical general least-squares regression analysis (PGLS). Both lines have significant slopes (p < 0.05). For OLS, the fitted equation is clade richness=1.24×clade age-8.29; while for PGLS, the fitted equation is clade richness=3.111×clade age-101.48.

    Interestingly, no significant diversification-shifting trend has been observed for the phylogeny of the 197 Galliformes species (Table 1). Several previous studies working on other avian taxa suggest a temporally diversification rate-declining pattern, for example that of the North American Wood-warblers (Rabosky and Lovette, 2008a). However, other studies also show that rates of diversification could have shown a temporally increasing trend up to our contemporary era for some specific species assemblages, for example Tiger Beetles (Barraclough and Vogler, 2002) and angiosperm plants (Magallon and Castillo, 2008). It is still controversial whether the rate of species diversification has a density-dependent trend throughout evolutionary times. From my observation of the Galliformes phylogeny, I conclude that this avian assemblage has a relatively constant rate of diversification over time, contradicting any time-dependent shifting trends of diversification.

    There is a strong correlation between clade age and Galliformes richness as shown in Figure 2. As such, the current study confirms that clade age predicts Galliformes diversity throughout evolutionary times, but not rates of diversification. This conclusion is consistent with those of several previous studies (McPeek and Brown, 2007; Etienne et al., 2012). However, other studies have argued that there is no clear positive relationship between clade age and species richness (Rabosky et al., 2012; Rabosky, 2009) due to variation in rates of diversification among clades (Rabosky et al., 2007). Because I found that rates of diversification tend to be constant over evolutionary times for this Galliformes assemblage (Table 1), species richness of this avian group is principally driven by clade age (Figure 2).

    As evidenced by the results of the Lagrange maximum likelihood analysis, it is found that SE Asia and N America are two disjunctive ancestral distributional origins for the earliest ancestor of Galliformes species. Dispersal frequency is very high for ancestral lineages of Galliformes. At some point in time, the lineage distributed in SE Asia then dispersed over Oceania while another lineage from N America dispersed to S America, Africa, E Asia and Europe. Active dispersals of Galliformes ancestors over the various continents might be an important driver of species diversity, because new vacant niches were available in these new terrestrial regions. Therefore, instead of rates of diversification, ecological opportunity might have played, implicitly, a role in species richness of Galliformes (Rabosky, 2009; Mahler et al., 2010; Setiadi et al., 2011).

    Some limitations apply to this study. First, the phylogeny used contains only 197 Galliformes species, which might be not sufficient to unravel the true macro-evolutionary pattern of the assemblage because the remaining 83 species have not been included in this analysis. It has been suggested that estimating rates of diversification is very sensitive to the complete status of the tree, because incomplete taxonomic sampling could generate artificial diversification rate-shifting patterns (Cusimano and Renner, 2010; Brock et al., 2011). Second, estimation of the ancestral range is widely applied in plant biogeographical studies. Whether it is legitimate to infer historically ancestral ranges for bird taxa using plant-tailored statistical methods requires further elaboration. However, there is a growing trend in inferring ancestral life-history states of avian groups (Winger et al., 2012). To a certain extent therefore, it should be rational to estimate the ancestral distribution of Galliformes using the analytical DEC, S-DIVA and BBM methods. Third, utilization of country-level distributional information might not be sufficient to quantify range-clade relationships, given that country-level distributional records do not accurately reflect the true distributional ranges of Galliformes species. For example, some species might be present in a small area of a large country, leading to the over-representation of the distribution of the species.

    In implementing further studies, the correlation of life-history traits and rates of diversification would be of interest, since it is reported that the ability of migration of avian species might slow down the rate of speciation of taxa (Ikeda et al., 2012; Claramunt et al., 2012). Analyses of the correlation between functional traits and rates of diversification would offer some insights into the relationship between dispersal capability and speciation patterns for Galliformes (Claramunt et al., 2012).

    The constant diversification rate for global Galliforme species implied that there were no diversification rate-shifting trends for Galliformes species. The present study may contribute to the understanding of the ecology and diversity patterns of Galliformes from the perspective of historical biogeography, although some limitations existed.

    The author declares that he has no competing interests.

    This work is supported by the China Scholarship Council (CSC). I like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments to improve the quality of the present work.

  • Collar NJ, Robson C (2007) Family Timaliidae (Babblers). In: del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Christie D (eds) Handbook of birds of the World. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, pp 70-291
    Pfeifer R (2013) What is a babbler? Fascinating diversity of life strategies and challenge for systematists. Vogelwarte 51:117-126
    Alström P, Ericson PGP, Olsson U, Sundberg P (2006) Phylogeny and classification of the avian superfamily Sylvioidea. Mol Phylogenet Evol 38:381-397
    Alström P, Olsson U, Lei FM (2013) A review of the recent advances in the systematics of the avian superfamily Sylvioidea. Chin Birds 4:99-131
    Alström P, Hopper DM, Liu Y, Olsson U, Mohan D, Gelang M et al (2014) Discovery of a relict lineage and monotypic family of passerine birds. Biol Lett 10:20131067
    Cibois A (2003) Mitochondrial DNA phylogeny of babblers (Timaliidae). Auk 120:35-54
    Cibois A, Kalyakin MV, Han L-X, Pasquet E (2002) Molecular phylogenetics of babblers (Timaliidae): revaluation of the genera Yuhina and Stachyris. J Avian Biol 33:380-390
    Dong F, Li S-H, Yang X-J (2010) Molecular systematics and diversification of the Asian scimitar babblers (Timaliidae, Aves) based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 57:1268-1275
    Dong F, Wu F, Liu LM, Yang XJ (2010) Molecular phylogeny of the barwings (Aves: Timaliidae: Actinodura), a paraphyletic group, and its taxonomic implications. Zool Stud 49:703-709
    Gelang M, Cibois A, Pasquet E, Olsson U, Alström P, Ericson PGP (2009) Phylogeny of babblers (Aves, Passeriformes): major lineages, family limits and classification. Zool Scr 38:225-236
    Moyle RG, Andersen MJ, Oliveros CH, Steinheimer FD, Reddy S (2012) Phylogeny and biogeography of the core babblers (Aves: Timaliidae). Syst Biol 61:631-651
    Reddy S (2008) Systematics and biogeography of the shrike-babblers (Pteruthius): species limits, molecular phylogenetics, and diversification patterns across southern Asia. Mol Phylogenet Evol 47:54-72
    Reddy S, Cracraft J (2007) Old World Shrike-babblers (Pteruthius) belong with New World Vireos (Vireonidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 44:1352-1357
    Oliveros CH, Reddy S, Moyle RG (2012) The phylogenetic position of some Philippine "babblers" spans the muscicapoid and sylvioid bird radiations. Mol Phylogenet Evol 65:799-804
    Beecher WJ (1953) A phylogeny of the Oscines. Auk 70:270-333
    Collar NJ (2006) A partial revision of the Asian babblers (Timaliidae). Forktail 22:85-112
    Delacour J (1946) Les timaliinés. L'Oiseau 16:7-36
    Mayr E, Amadon D (1951) A classification of recent birds. Am Mus Novit 1496:1-42
    Pasquet E, Bourdon E, Kalyakin MV, Cibois A (2006) The fulvettas (Alcippe, Timaliidae, Aves): a polyphyletic group. Zool Scr 35:559-566
    Barker FK, Cibois A, Schikler P, Feinstein J, Cracraft J (2004) Phylogeny and diversification of the largest avian radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:11040-11045
    Fregin S, Haase M, Olsson U, Alström P (2012) New insights into family relationships within the avian superfamily Sylvioidea (Passeriformes) based on seven molecular markers. BMC Evol Biol 12:157
    Gill F, Donsker D (eds) (2015) IOC World Bird List (v 5.2). doi:
    Collar NJ (2011) Taxonomic notes on some Asian babblers (Timaliidae). Forktail 27:100-102
    Dickinson EC, Christidis L (2014) The Howard and Moore complete checklist of the birds of the world, vol 2: Passerines, 4th edn. Christopher Helm, London
    Athreya R (2006) A new species of Liocichla (Aves: Timaliidae) from Eaglenest Wildlife Sanctuary, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Indian Birds 2:82-94
    Fu Y, Dowell SD, Zhang Z (2013) Emei Shan Liocichla: population, behavior and conservation. Chin Birds 4:260-264
    Peterson AT, Papeş M (2006) Potential geographic distribution of the Bugun Liocichla Liocichla bugunorum, a poorly-known species from north-eastern India. Indian Birds 2:146-149
    McKay BD, Mays HL Jr, Peng Y-W, Kozak KH, Yao C-T, Yuan H-W et al (2010) Recent range-wide demographic expansion in a Taiwan endemic montane bird, Steere's Liocichla (Liocichla steerii). BMC Evol Biol 10:71
    Dickinson EC (2003) The Howard and Moore complete checklist of the birds of the world, 3rd edn. Christopher Helm, London
    Luo X, Qu YH, Han LX, Li S-H, Lei FM (2009) A phylogenetic analysis of laughingthrushes (Timaliidae: Garrulax) and allies based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Zool Scr 38:9-22
    Päckert M, Martens J, Sun Y-H, Severinghaus LL, Nazarenko AA, Ting J et al (2011) Horizontal and elevational phylogeographic patterns of Himalayan and Southeast Asian forest passerines (Aves: Passeriformes). J Biogeogr 39:556-573
    de Bruyn M, Stelbrink B, Morley RJ, Hall R, Carvalho GR, Cannon CH et al (2014) Borneo and Indochina are major evolutionary hotspots for Southeast Asian biodiversity. Syst Biol 63:879-901
    Price TD, Hooper DM, Buchanan CD, Johansson US, Tietze DT, Alström P et al (2014) Niche filling slows the diversification of Himalayan songbirds. Nature 509:222-225
    Backström N, Fagerberg S, Ellegren H (2008) Genomics of natural bird populations: a gene-based set of reference markers evenly spread across the avian genome. Mol Ecol 17:964-980
    Primmer CR, Borge T, Lindell J, Sætre GP (2002) Single-nucleotide polymorphism characterization in species with limited available sequence information: high nucleotide diversity revealed in the avian genome. Mol Ecol 11:603-612
    Marini MÂ, Hackett SJ (2002) A multifaceted approach to the characterization of an intergeneric hybrid manakin (Pipridae) from Brazil. Auk 119:1114-1120
    Moonsamy PV, Williams T, Bonella P, Holcomb CL, Höglund BN, Hillman G et al (2013) High throughput HLA genotyping using 454 sequencing and the Fluidigm Access Array™ System for simplified amplicon library preparation. Tissue Antigens 81:141-149
    Sorenson MD, Ast JC, Dimcheff DE, Yuri T, Mindell DP (1999) Primers for a PCR-based approach to mitochondrial genome sequencing in birds and other vertebrates. Mol Phylogenet Evol 12(2):105-114
    Chesser RT (1999) Molecular systematics of the Rhinocryptid genus Pteroptochos. Condor 101:439-446
    Groth JG (1998) Molecular phylogenetics of finches and sparrows: consequences of character state removal in cytochrome b sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 10(3):377-390
    Reddy S, Moyle RG (2011) Systematics of the scimitar babblers (Pomatorhinus: Timaliidae): Phylogeny, biogeography and species-limits of four species complexes. Biol J Linn Soc 102:846-869
    Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S et al (2012) Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28:1647-1649
    Stephens M, Smith NJ, Donnelly P (2001) A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am J Hum Genet 68:978-989
    Librado P, Rozas J (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25:1451-1452
    Bruen TC, Philippe H, Bryant D (2006) A simple and robust statistical test for detecting the presence of recombination. Genetics 172:2665-2681
    Huson DH, Bryant D (2006) Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol 23:254-267
    Hudson RR, Kreitman M, Aguadé M (1987) A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics 116:153-159
    Darriba D, Taboada GL, Ramón D, Posada D (2012) JModelTest 2: more models, new hueristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods 9:772
    Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O (2010) New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol 59:307-321
    Guindon S, Gascuel O (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 52:696-704
    Swofford DL (2003) PAUP* phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and Other Methods) v 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
    Bouckaert R, Heled J, Kühnert D, Vaughan T, Wu C-H, Xie D et al (2014) BEAST 2: a software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput Biol 10:e1003537
    Heled J, Drummond AJ (2010) Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol Biol Evol 27:570-580
    Bouckaert R (2015) bModelTest: Bayesian site model selection for nucleotide data. bioRxiv. . Accessed 28 July 2015
    Drummond AJ, Ho SYW, Phillips MJ, Rambaut A (2006) Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biol 4:e88
    Weir JT, Schluter D (2008) Calibrating the avian molecular clock. Mol Ecol 17:2321-2328
    Pereira SL, Baker AJ (2006) A mitogenomic timescale for birds detects variable phylogenetic molecular evolution and refutes the standard molecular clock. Mol Biol Evo 23:1731-1740
    Fleischer RC, McIntosh CE, Tarr CL (1998) Evolution on a volcanic conveyor belt: using phylogeographic reconstructions and K-Ar-based ages of the Hawaiian Islands to estimate molecular evolutionary rates. Mol Ecol 7:533-545
    Rambaut A, Suchard M, Xie D, Drummond AJ (2014) Tracer v 1.6. . Accessed 28 July 2015
    Baele G, Lemey P, Bedford T, Rambaut A, Suchard MA, Alekseyenko AV (2012) Improving the accuracy of demographic and molecular clock model comparison while accommodating phylogenetic uncertainty. Mol Biol Evol 29:2157-2167
    Zink RM, Barrowclough GF (2008) Mitochondrial DNA under siege in avian phylogeography. Mol Ecol 17(9):2107-2121
    Mays HL Jr, Doucet SM, Yao C-T, Yuan H-W (2006) Sexual dimorphism and dichromatism in Steere's Liocichla (Liocichla steerii). J Field Ornithol 77:437-443
    Dong F, Li S-H, Zou FS, Lei FM, Liang W, Yang JX et al (2014) Molecular systematics and plumage coloration evolution of an enigmatic babbler (Pomatorhinus ruficollis) in East Asia. Mol Phylogenet Evol 70:76-83
    McKay BD, Mays HL Jr, Wu YC, Li H, Yao C-T, Nishiumi I et al (2013) An empirical comparison of character-based and coalescent-based approaches to species delimitation in a young avian complex. Mol Ecol 22:4943-4957
    Reddy S, Sharief S, Yohe LR, Witkowski J, Hosner PA, Nyári ÁS et al (2015) Untangling taxonomic confusion and diversification patterns of the Streak-breasted Scimitar Babblers (Timaliidae: Pomatorhinus ruficollis complex) in southern Asia. Mol Phylogenet Evol 82:183-192
    Stoddard MC, Prum RO (2011) How colorful are birds? Evolution of the avian plumage color gamut. Behav Ecol 22:1042-1052
    Friedman NR, McGraw KJ, Omland KE (2014) Evolution of carotenoid pigmentation in caciques and meadowlarks (Icteridae): repeated gains of red plumage coloration by carotenoid C4-oxygenation. Evolution 68:791-801
    Omland KE, Lanyon SM (2000) Reconstructing plumage evolution in orioles (Icterus): repeated convergence and reversal in patterns. Evolution 54:2119-2133
    Molnar P (2005) Mio-Pliocene growth of the Tibetan plateau and evolution of East Asian climate. Palaeontol Electron 8:2A
    Zhang R, Jiang DB, Zhang ZS, Yu E (2015) The impact of regional uplift of the Tibetan Plateau on the Asian monsoon climate. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 417:137-150
    Bird MI, Taylor D, Hunt C (2005) Palaeoenvironments of insular Southeast Asia during the Last Glacial Period: a savanna corridor in Sundaland? Quat Sci Rev 24:2228-2242
    Cerling TE, Harris JM, MacFadden BJ, Leakey MG, Quade J, Eisenmann V et al (1997) Global vegetation change through the Miocene/Pliocene boundary. Nature 389:153-158
    McKay BD (2011) A new timeframe for the diversification of Japan's mammals. J Biogeogr 39:1134-1143
    Johansson US, Alström P, Olsson U, Ericson PGP, Sundberg P, Price TD (2007) Build-up of the Himalayan avifauna through immigration: a biogeographical analysis of the Phylloscopus and Seicercus warblers. Evolution 61:324-333
    Qu YH, Song G, Gao B, Quan Q, Ericson PGP, Lei FM (2014) The influence of geological events on the endemism of East Asian birds studied through comparative phylogeography. J Biogeogr 42:179-192
    Che J, Zhou WW, Hu JS, Yan F, Papenfuss TJ, Wake DB et al (2010) Spiny frogs (Paini) illuminate the history of the Himalayan region and Southeast Asia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:13765-13770
    Qiu YX, Guan BC, Fu CX, Comes HP (2009) Did glacials and/or interglacials promote allopatric incipient speciation in East Asian temperate plants? Phylogeographic and coalescent analysis on refugial isolation and divergence in Dysosma versipellis. Mol Phylogenet Evol 51:281-293
    Wang L, Schneider H, Zhang XC, Xiang QP (2012) The rise of the Himalaya enforced the diversification of SE Asian ferns by altering the monsoon regimes. BMC Plant Biol 12:210
    Wang WJ, McKay BD, Dai CY, Zhao N, Zhang RY, Qu YH et al (2013) Glacial expansion and diversification of an East Asian montane bird, the green-backed tit (Parus monticolus). J Biogeogr 40:1156-1169
    Song G, Qu YH, Yin ZH, Li S-H, Liu N, Lei FM (2009) Phylogeography of the Alcippe morrisonia (Aves: Timaliidae): long population history beyond late Pleistocene glaciations. BMC Evol Biol 9:143
    Zou FS, Lim H-C, Marks BD, Moyle RG, Sheldon FH (2007) Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Grey-cheeked Fulvetta (Alcippe morrisonia) of China and Indochina: a case of remarkable genetic divergence in a "species". Mol Phylogenet Evol 44:165-174
    Lovette IJ (2004) Mitochondrial dating and mixed support for the "2% Rule" in birds. Auk 121:1-6
    Bromham L, Penny D (2003) The modern molecular clock. Nat Rev Genet 4(3):216-224
    Welch JJ, Bromham L (2005) Molecular dating when rates vary. Trends Ecol Evol 20:320-327
    Teng LS (1990) Geotectonic evolution of late Cenozoic arc-continent collision in Taiwan. Tectonophysics 183:57-76
    Huang C-Y, Yuan PB, Tsao S-J (2006) Temporal and spatial records of active arc-continent collision in Taiwan: a synthesis. Geol Soc Am Bull 118:274-288
    Lee Y-H, Chen C-C, Liu T-K, Ho H-C, Lu H-Y, Lo W (2006) Mountain building mechanisms in the Southern Central Range of the Taiwan Orogenic Belt—From accretionary wedge deformation to arc—continental collision. Earth Planet Sci Lett 252:413-422
    Päckert M, Martens J, Severinghaus LL (2008) The Taiwan Firecrest (Regulus goodfellowi) belongs to the Goldcrest assemblage (Regulus regulus s. l.): evidence from mitochondrial DNA and the territorial song of the Regulidae. J Ornithol 150:205-220
    Wu HC, Lin RC, Hung H-Y, Yeh C-F, Chu J-H, Yang XJ et al (2011) Molecular and morphological evidences reveal a cryptic species in the Vinaceous rosefinch Carpodacus vinaceus (Fringillidae; Aves). Zool Scr 40:468-478
    Tietze DT, Päckert M, Martens J, Lehmann H, Sun Y-H (2013) Complete phylogeny and historical biogeography of true rosefinches (Aves: Carpodacus). Zool J Linn Soc 169:215-234
    McKay BD, Mays HL Jr, Yao C-T, Wan D, Higuchi H, Nishiumi I (2014) Incorporating color into integrative taxonomy: analysis of the varied tit (Sittiparus varius) complex in East Asia. Syst Biol 63:505-517
    Chou Y-W, Thomas PI, Ge X-J, LePage BA, Wang C-N (2011) Refugia and phylogeography of Taiwania in East Asia. J Biogeogr 38:1992-2005
    Jang-Liaw N-H, Lee T-H, Chou W-H (2008) Phylogeography of Sylvirana latouchii (Anura, Ranidae) in Taiwan. Zool Sci 25:68-79
    Jang-Liaw N-H, Chou W-H (2011) Phylogeography of the fanged dicroglossine frog, Limnonectes fujianensis (Anura, Ranidae), in Taiwan. Zool Sci 28:254-263
    Huang J-P, Lin C-P (2011) Lineage-specific late pleistocene expansion of an endemic subtropical gossamer-wing damselfly, Euphaea formosa, in Taiwan. BMC Evol Biol 11:94
    Lei FM, Qu YH, Lu JL, Liu Y, Yin ZH (2003) Conservation on diversity and distribution patterns of endemic birds in China. Biodivers Conserv 12:239-254
    Favre A, Päckert M, Pauls SU, Jähnig SC, Uhl D, Michalak I et al (2014) The role of the uplift of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau for the evolution of Tibetn biotas. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 90:236-253
    Li Y, Zhai SN, Qiu YX, Guo YP, Ge XJ, Comes HP (2011) Glacial survival east and west of the 'Mekong-Salween Divide' in the Himalaya-Hengduan Mountains region as revealed by AFLPs and cpDNA sequence variation in Sinopodophyllum hexandrum (Berberidaceae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 59:412-424
    Kingdon-Ward F (1921) The Mekong-Salween divide as a geographical barrier. Geogr J 58:49-56
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. Alberto Fuentes-López, María Teresa Rebelo, Elena Romera, et al. Genetic diversity of Calliphora vicina (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in the Iberian Peninsula based on cox1, 16S and ITS2 sequences. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2020. DOI:10.1093/biolinnean/blaa109
    2. Youhua CHEN. Does the diversification rate of endemic birds of mainland China follow abrupt, gradual shifting or constant patterns?. Integrative Zoology, 2017, 12(2): 165. DOI:10.1111/1749-4877.12205

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Figures(5)  /  Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (436) PDF downloads (11) Cited by(2)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return