Wondimagegnehu TEKALIGN, Afework BEKELE. 2011: Status of and threats to the Black-winged Lovebird (Agapornis taranta) in Entoto Natural Park and Bole Sub-City, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Avian Research, 2(4): 174-182. DOI: 10.5122/cbirds.2011.0029
Citation: Wondimagegnehu TEKALIGN, Afework BEKELE. 2011: Status of and threats to the Black-winged Lovebird (Agapornis taranta) in Entoto Natural Park and Bole Sub-City, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Avian Research, 2(4): 174-182. DOI: 10.5122/cbirds.2011.0029

Status of and threats to the Black-winged Lovebird (Agapornis taranta) in Entoto Natural Park and Bole Sub-City, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Wondimagegnehu Tekalign, E-mail: wondimagegnehubeyene@gmail.com

  • Received Date: 28 Apr 2011
  • Accepted Date: 03 Nov 2011
  • Available Online: 23 Apr 2023
  • A study of the population status of and threats to the Black-winged Lovebird (Agapornis taranta) was carried out from September 2008 to February 2009 in Entoto Natural Park (ENP) and in Bole Sub-City, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. A point transect count technique was employed to examine the status of the lovebirds. An average total of 58 birds was recorded of which 46 were counted in Bole Sub-City and 12 in Entoto Natural Park areas. The maximum number recorded during our census was 57 in the dry season and 15 in the wet season in Bole Sub-City and Entoto Natural Park, respectively. The ratio of adult males to adult females in Entoto Natural Park was 1:0.71 and 1:0.60, and 1:0.76 and 1:0.78 in Bole Sub-City during both wet and dry seasons, respectively. The seasonal variation and difference in sex ratios between males and females was not significant (p > 0.05) at either of the study sites. The threat for the Black-winged Lovebird or other birds in Entoto Natural Park is due to the fragmentation of natural habitats, thus decreasing food sources, owing to the domination of eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) trees in the area. Grazing by livestock, intensive farming practices and deforestation by the local community have contributed greatly to the degradation of the land resulting in erosion, thus devastating the habitat of the Natural Park. The vegetation cover of Entoto Natural Park and urban gardens should be managed effectively for the survival of the avian fauna of the area.

  • Pollution of the natural environment by heavy metals is a worldwide problem. Heavy metals enter the aquatic ecosystem through a variety of anthropogenic sources as well as from natural processes (Ebrahimpour and Mushrifah, 2010). They are a serious threat because of their toxicity, bioaccumulation, long persistence and bio-magnification in the food chain (Erdoĝrul and Ates, 2006). The degree of toxic metal uptake, translocation and eventual detoxification within an organism depends on metal speciation, but also differs strongly among organisms (Mukherjee and Nuorteva, 1994; Doyle and Otte, 1997). Assessing ecosystem health adequately by means of biomonitoring requires the selection of representative indicator species. Birds are widely used to biomonitoring variation in environmental levels of anthropogenic pollutants (Furness and Camphuysen, 1997; Barbieri et al., 2009), because they are exposed to a wide range of chemicals and occupy high trophic levels and can therefore provide information on the extent of contamination in the entire food chain (Furness and Camphuysen, 1997; Burger et al., 2007).

    According to Burger and Gochfeld(2000a, 2000b) feathers are useful for measuring heavy metal contamination in birds because birds sequester heavy metals in their feathers, where the proportion of the body burden is relatively constant for each metal. In general, metals in breast feathers are representative of circulating concentrations in the blood stream only during the limited time period of feather formation, which in turn represents both local exposure and mobilization from internal tissues (Lewis and Furness, 1991; Monteiro, 1996). Many studies have recommended herons and egrets as bioindicators for heavy metals in aquatic systems and local pollution around breeding sites (Boncompagni et al., 2003; Kim and Koo, 2007). Herons and gulls are high at the top of their food pyramid and can yield information over a large area around each sampling site, not only on bioavailability of contaminants but also on how, where, and when they are transferred within the food web (Battaglia et al., 2005). Hence, the aim of the present study was to investigate the level of nickel in feathers of two bird species, the Western Reef Heron (Egretta gularis) and the Siberian Gull (Larus heuglini), in order 1) to compare metal concentrations between two species with their life strategy and 2) to examine the species and gender related variation in trace nickel accumulations in the Hara Biosphere Reserve of southern Iran.

    The Hara Biosphere Reserve (26°40′–27°N, 55°21′–55°52′E) is located in southern Iran, in the Straits of Khuran between Queshm Island and the Persian Gulf (Fig. 1). This area became part of the Man and Biosphere Program (MAB) of UNESCO in 1977 (UNESCO, 2010). As well, this region is one of the protected areas in Iran introduced by the Department of the Environment. The entire region was selected as wetland of international importance under the Wetlands of International Importance category as a Habitat of Aquatic Birds. This region was also introduced as one of the important bird areas by the International Organization of Birdlife (Neinavaz et al., 2010).

    Figure  1.  Location of the Hara Biosphere Reserve in southern Iran

    During November and December 2010, under license of the Environmental Protection Agency of Hormozgan, a total of thirty birds were shot and removed from throughout the Hara biosphere reserve. The collection included the Western Reef Heron (Egretta gularis) (n = 15) and the Siberian Gull (Larus heuglini) (n = 15). The birds were transported to the laboratory packed in ice. The specimen were killed, weighed, stored in plastic bags and kept at −20℃ until dissection and analysis. We chose breast feathers because they are representatives of the plumage and are less affected by molt compared to flight feathers. All feathers were analyzed in the Laboratory of the Inland Water Aquaculture Research Institute in port Anzali. The feather samples were digested in a nitric acid (HNO3) and perchloric acid (HClO4) mixture. Feathers were then accurately weighed in 150-mL Erlenmeyer flasks, where 10 mL nitric acid (65%) was added to each sample. The samples were left overnight to be slowly digested; thereafter, 5 mL perchloric acid (70%) was added to each sample. Digestion was performed on a hot plate (sand bath) at 200℃. After that, the digested samples were diluted by 25 mL deionized water. The concentration of nickel was estimated using a Shimadzu AA 680 flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer. The accuracy of the analysis was checked by measuring CRM certified reference tissue (DORM-2, NRC Canada). The detection limit for nickel was 0.039 µg·g−1. The results for nickel gave a mean recovery of 98.6%.

    A statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS (version 18.0). We used a three-way ANOVA for nickel (sex, age, species, interaction (sex × age × species)). Data were log transformed to obtain normal distributions that satisfied the homogeneity of variance required by ANOVA (Custer et al., 2003; Kim et al., 2009). The nickel concentration in feathers was tested for mean differences between species using Student t tests. The level of significance was set at α = 0.05. The concentration of nickel in feathers was expressed in microgram per gram of dry weight (dw). Values are given in means ± standard errors (SE).

    Variations in the nickel concentration of feathers of the Western Reef Heron and Siberian Gull are presented in Table 1. The results show that there was a significant difference between the mean nickel concentrations in the two bird species, i.e. the Western Reef Heron and Siberian Gull, while there was no evidence of significant different accumulation between genders and ages (Table 2). Also, the results indicate that the level of nickel concentration in the Western Reef Heron was higher in females than in males; in contrast, the level of nickel concentration in the Siberian gull was higher in males.

    Table  1.  Geometric means (95% CI) nickel concentrations in feathers of Western Reef Heron and Siberian Gull from the Hara Biosphere Reserve of southern Iran
    Species Male/adult Male/juvenile Female/adult Female/juvenile
    Western Reef Heron
    Geometric mean 2.77 3.79 4.67
    Mean ± SE 3.47±2.7 4.67±2.7 4.67
    Number 9/9 5/5 1
    Siberian Gull
    Geometric mean 8.89 3.87 6.72 7.24
    Mean ± SE 8.94±1.1 4.38±2.5 7.6±3.4 8.1±4.8
    Number 3/3 3/3 6/6 3/3
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table  2.  Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of nickel concentrations among species, gender and age
    Source of variation Mean square F p
    Species 78.23 8.56 0.01 a
    Gender 9.56 1.04 NS b
    Age 7.57 0.82 NS
    Intercept (species × gender × age) 572.55 62.66 0.001
    a p-value for 3-way ANOVA. Interaction term significant as indicated.
    b NS = not significant at p > 0.05.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Nickel is not an important trace element in organisms, but at high levels, they can cause adverse health effects. Sources of heavy metals vary considerably. It is emitted into the environment by both natural and man-made sources. Once released into the environment, nickel readily forms complexes with many ligands, making it more mobile than most heavy metals (Mansouri et al., 2011). Nickel is related to the pigmentation of feathers in birds and excreted via the feathers by moulting (Honda et al., 1986). Nickel concentrations in the current study (3.47–8.94 µg·g−1) were higher than those in Fulica atra (0.8 µg·g−1), Phalacrocorax carbo (0.5 µg·g−1) and Nycticorax nycticorax (1.2 µg·g−1) from Russia (Lebedeva, 1997), in Egretta alba (0.2 µg·g−1) from Korea (Honda et al., 1986) and Parus major (0.25 µg·g−1) from China (Deng et al., 2007). In our study, the nickel concentrations were similar to those in Bubulcus ibis L. (7.8–9.0 µg·g−1) from Pakistan (Malik and Zeb, 2009).

    Few studies have examined the effect of gender on the accumulation of heavy metals in feathers and other tissues (Burger, 1995; Zamani-Ahmadmahmoodi et al., 2010). Several studies reported no significant differences in the heavy metal content of feathers between male and female birds (Hutton, 1981; Zamani-Ahmadmahmoodi et al., 2009a). Similarly, in the present study there was no evidence of significant different accumulations between male and female birds (Table 2), suggesting that both sexes utilize similar foraging strategies in both species (Hindell et al., 1999). While studying heavy metals in the feathers of Larus dominicanus, Barbieri et al. (2009) showed that the levels of nickel concentration were higher in adults (5.92 µg·g−1) than in juveniles (2.23 µg·g−1). Similar levels of nickel have been detected in other seabird species from different parts of the world (Norheim, 1987). Adults have had several years to accumulate metals in their internal tissues; these can be mobilized into the blood and deposited in feathers during their formation (Burger, 1994). Elsewhere, Burger and Gochfeld (1991) pointed to heavy metal concentrations in feathers of adult birds that may reflect exposure obtained at other time of the year, including exposure at non-breeding areas. On the other hand, while they were studying heavy metal concentrations in the feathers of Herring Gulls (Larus argentatus) in Captree, Long Island, they showed that the cadmium concentration was higher in juveniles but the lead concentration was higher in adults (Burger, 1995). Differences in levels of metal concentrations in adults and fledglings might also occur if adults and young eat different types of food during the breeding season, or different-sized food items (Burger, 1996).

    Research has indicated that the concentration of heavy metals in the tissues of migratory birds is higher than that in resident birds (Pacyna et al., 2006; Zamani-Ahmadmahmoodi et al., 2009b). Siberian Gulls are winter visitors to Hara Biosphere Reserve, while Western Reef Heron are residents there. The results of the current study show that the amount of nickel in the Siberian Gull feathers is higher than in the Western Reef Heron.

    The results of three-way ANOVA showed there were significant differences between the Western Reef Heron and Siberian Gull (p < 0.01). The Siberian Gull showed higher nickel concentrations than the Western Reef Heron. Birds that are large fish eaters should accumulate higher levels than those that eat a range of different foods or smaller fish. Furthermore, levels of metal in birds should reflect the levels in the fish they consume (Burger, 2002). The main difference in nickel levels between Western Reef Heron and Siberian Gull could be the result of different phylogenetic origin and physiology (Teal, 1969; Welty, 1975; Deng et al. 2007), or because they grow their feathers in different breeding areas with different levels of background contamination. Also, metabolic rates vary inversely with body weight and directly with activities such as flight and rest. Being smaller than Western Reef Heron, Siberian Gull was expected to have a higher metabolic rate. Higher metabolic rates may cause fast accumulations of trace nickel in the Siberian Gull. In general, the Siberian Gull eats more invertebrates than the Western Reef Heron, catches some larger fish (between 20–25 cm in size), consumes offal discarded by fishing boats and eats dead fish found along the shore, while the Western Reef Heron eats smaller fish, amphibians and insects.

  • Alderton D. 2003. The Ultimate Encyclopedia of Caged and Aviary Birds. Hermes House, London.
    Atkins JD. 1996. The Birds of Entoto Natural Park: List of Records and Possible Species (unpublished document). Ethiopian Heritage Trust, Addis Ababa.
    Baker PJ, Thomas RL, Newson SE, Thompson V, Paling NRD. 2010. Habitat associations and breeding bird community composition within the city of Bristol, UK. Bird Study, 57: 183–196.
    Bart J, Schoultz JD. 1984. Reliability of singing bird surveys: Changes in observer efficiency with avian density. Auk, 101: 307–318.
    Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA, Mustoe SH. 2000. Bird Census Techniques. Academic Press, London.
    Bibby CJ, Jones M, Marsden S. 1998. Expedition Field Techniques: Bird Surveys. Royal Geographical Society, London.
    BirdLife International. 2006. Agapornis taranta. 2006. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Accessed 8 October 2008.
    BirdLife International. 2008. BirdLife's online World Bird Database: the site for bird conservation. Version 2.1. Cambridge. . Accessed 12 October 2008.
    Bolen EG, Robinson WL. 2003. Wildlife Ecology and Management. Pearson Education, New Jersey.
    Borghesio L, Laiolo P. 2004. Seasonal foraging ecology in a forest avifauna of northern Kenya. J Trop Ecol, 20: 145–155.
    Burger J. 1986. The effect of human activity on shorebirds in two coastal bays in the northeastern United States. Environ Conserv, 13: 123–130.
    Buskirk WH, McDonald JL. 1995. Comparison of point count regimes for monitoring forest birds. For Serv Gen Rep, 149: 25–34.
    Calme S, Desrochers A. 1999. Nested birds and micro-habitat assemblages in a peat land archipelago. Oecologia, 118: 361–370.
    Davison W. 2009. Entoto Natural Park – an environmental success story in the making. Selamta, 26: 50–52.
    Donnelly R, Marzluff JM. 2004. Importance of reserve size and landscape context to urban bird conservation. Conserv Biol, 18: 733–745.
    Evans KL, Newson SE, Gaston KJ. 2009. Habitat influences on urban avian assemblages. Ibis, 151: 19–39.
    EWNHS (Ethiopian Wildlife and Natural History Society). 1996. Important Bird Areas of Ethiopia: A First Inventory. Ethiopian Wildlife and Natural History Society, Addis Ababa.
    Fishpool LDC, Evans MI. 2001. Important Bird Areas in Africa and Associated Islands. BirdLife International, Cambridge.
    Gebremariam B, Biru A. 1998. Bole 'Landafta'. Bole Sub-City, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Bole 1: 2–4.
    Germaine SS, Rosenstock SS, Schweinsburg RE, Richardson WS. 1998. Relationships among breeding birds, habitat, and residential development in greater Tuscon, Arizona. Ecol Appl, 8: 680–691.
    Green RJ. 1984. Native and exotic birds in a suburban habitat. Aust Wildl Res, 11: 181–90.
    Heywood VH. 1995. Global Biodiversity Assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    Hosteler ME, Main MB. 2001. Florida Monitoring Program: Transect and Point Count Method for Surveying Birds. University of Florida Press, Florida.
    Kenny LB. 1998. Lovebirds Are Getting Started. T.F.H. Publications, New York.
    Lafferty KD. 2001. Birds at a Southern California beach: seasonality, habitat use and disturbance by human activity. Biodiv Conserv, 10: 1949–1962.
    Lohmus A. 2003. Are certain habitats better every year? A review and a case study on birds of prey. Ecography, 26: 545–552.
    McKinney ML. 2002. Urbanization, biodiversity and conservation. Bioscience, 52: 883–90.
    Niemuth ND, Estery ME, Reynolds RE, Leach CL, Meeks WA. 2006. Use of wetlands by spring-migrant shorebirds in agricultural landscapes of North Dakota's drift prairie. Wetlands, 26: 30–39.
    Sorley CS, Andersen DE. 1994. Raptor abundance in south-central Kenya in relation to land-use patterns. Afr J Ecol, 32: 30–38.
    Stattersfield AJ, Crosby MJ, Long AJ, Wege DC. 1998. Endemic Bird Areas of the World: Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation. BirdLife Conservation Series no. 7. BirdLife International, Cambridge.
    Sutherland WG. 1996. Ecological Census Techniques. A Hand Book. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    Urban EK, Brown LM. 1971. A Checklist of the Birds of Ethiopia. Haile Sellassie I University, Addis Ababa.
    Urban EK. 1980. Ethiopia's Endemic Birds. Ethiopian Tourism Commission, Artistic Printers, Addis Ababa.
    Vale TR, Vale GR. 1976. Suburban bird populations in west-central California. J Biogeogr, 9: 413–434.
    Verner J. 1985. Assessment of counting methods. Curr Ornithol, 2: 247–302.
    Viverpol JL. 2001. A Guide to Endemic Birds of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Shama Books, Addis Ababa.
    WCMC (World Conservation Monitoring Centre). 1991. Biodiversity Guide to Ethiopia. World Conservation Monitoring Center, Cambridge.
    Whittingham MJ, Percival SM, Brown AF. 2000. Time budgets and foraging of breeding golden plover Pluvialis apricaria. J Appl Ecol, 37: 632–646.
    Williams JG, Alrott N. 1980. A Field Guide to the Birds of East and Central Africa. Collins, St. James's, London.
  • Related Articles

Catalog

    Figures(2)  /  Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (4836) PDF downloads (4007) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return