Lubna ALI, Noor-un-nisa, Syed Shahid SHAUKAT, Rafia Rehana GHAZI. 2011: Sex and age classes of prey items (rats/mice) in the diet of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) in Sindh, Pakistan. Avian Research, 2(2): 79-86. DOI: 10.5122/cbirds.2011.0012
Citation: Lubna ALI, Noor-un-nisa, Syed Shahid SHAUKAT, Rafia Rehana GHAZI. 2011: Sex and age classes of prey items (rats/mice) in the diet of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) in Sindh, Pakistan. Avian Research, 2(2): 79-86. DOI: 10.5122/cbirds.2011.0012

Sex and age classes of prey items (rats/mice) in the diet of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) in Sindh, Pakistan

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Lubna ALI, E-mail: pklubna@yahoo.com

  • Received Date: 22 Feb 2011
  • Accepted Date: 22 May 2011
  • Available Online: 23 Apr 2023
  • Barn Owl (Tyto alba) pellets were collected from nine locations and two districts of Sindh, Pakistan and 937 prey items were recovered from 619 pellets. Rats/mice (59.6%) were the most dominant food items consumed by the Barn Owl. Shrews (22.3%), bats (1.3%), birds (12.0%), insects (1.3%), frogs (2.2%) and plant materials (1.3%) were found in their diet as well. Study of the pelvic girdle bones of rats/mice, used only for sexing, proved to be a useful device in population dynamics. In the pelvic bone, pelvic symphysis is found only in female rats/mice developed as a result of sex hormones that occur during gestation. Among the diet of rats/mice, males were found to be significantly dominant. Tooth wear patterns on the occlusal surfaces of molariform teeth of the rats/mice were found to provide an effective criterion for establishing age classes of rats/mice. In the present study, adult rats/mice were found to be dominant over sub-adults and old adults. ANOVA showed significant differences in the number of rats/mice and shrews (prey items) and the other prey items/plant materials in the diet of Barn Owls in the district Thatta and district Karachi. Chi-square test disclosed non-significant differences in age and sex categories.

  • In January (K.L. Chang) and May 2010 (J.Y. Lei and L. Chen), we carried out two separate birding trips in the southern Zhangmu, a small town in southern Tibet (27°59′37′′N, 85°58′00′′E; 1755–2380 m a.s.l.) adjacent to Nepal. We observed birds by binoculars, made photographs and recorded sounds of some significant bird species during these trips. Among the bird species we recorded in these trips, we identified the Himalayan Black-lored Tit (Parus xanthogenys) and the Nepal Wren-Babbler (Pnoepyga immaculate) which have not been included in any checklist of birds of China (e.g. Cheng, 1987; MacKinnon et al., 2000; Zheng, 2005) and hence they are confirmed as new bird records for China. Here we describe details of these two new bird records.

    Two tits with vivid yellow facial patterns were recorded by K.L. Chang on 18 January 2010 and were quickly identified as Himalayan Black-lored Tits according to his previous birding experience of this species in Nepal (Fig. 1). In a subsequent spring trip, J.Y. Lei, L. Chen and four other observers also located and photographed a flock of Himalayan Black-lored Tits (n > 10) on the road from Zhangmu to the China-Nepal border checkpoint at an elevation of 1600 m on 12 May and 15 May 2010. This species may be either a common or an uncommon resident at Zhangmu.

    Figure  1.  The Himalayan Black-lored Tit (Parus xanthogenys) (Photo by Liang Chen)

    The Himalayan Black-lored Tit (Fig. 1) is a large-sized tit, estimated to be about 13 cm in length, with a body size equally large as that of the Great Tit (Parus major) and the Yellow-cheeked Tit (P. spilonotus). It is a yellow-and-black tit, with a broad black line through the middle of its underparts, extending to the breast and throat. The long and pronounced crest, neck and front are also black with yellow cheeks. Black stripes, started from the neck, extend to the lores, constituting a striking facial pattern. The upper parts are olive-green with a few black streaks confined to the scapulars. It resembles the Yellow-cheeked Tit (P. spilonotus), probably its closest relative, as well as the other yellow-and-crested tit in the Himalayas, but this latter bird apparently lacks black in its forehead and lores. Females and young birds are reported to be duller in color than males (Grimmett et al., 1999; Rasmussen and Anderton, 2005). The flock we observed may have been a mixture of both males and female-like birds.

    This species is a common resident in open tropical forests, secondary forests and edges of dense forests and groves of the Indian subcontinent, from north Pakistan through the Himalayas to eastern Nepal (Grimmett et al., 1999; Rasmussen and Anderton, 2005). Three subspecies were described under the species level, the nominate races xanthogenys, aplonotus and travancoreensis (Grimmett et al., 1999; Rasmussen and Anderton, 2005). Based on evidence of morphology and vocalization, Rasmussen and Anderton (2005) proposed that xanthogenys and the two other subspecies should be treated as two species: the Himalayan Black-lored Tit (Parus xanthogenys) (monotypic) and the India Black-lored Tit (P. aplonotus), with subspecies aplonotus and travancoreensis. Gill (2010) adopted this taxonomic treatment in the IOC World Bird Names. The location where we sighted the birds, our field description and morphological characteristics shown in the photographs, explicitly match the diagnosis of the taxon xanthogenys. Following Gill (2010), we therefore confirm that our sighting of the Himalayan Black-lored Tit (P. xanthogenys) is a new record for this bird species in China.

    On 8 May 2010, near the Zhangmu Hotel we heard a series of high-pitched metallic notes, like "tsi-tsu-tsi-tsi-tsu-tsi-tsi-tsi", speeding up at the end and repeating several times. We then recorded its repeating sound and did play-back. The bird responded promptly and was easily lured out, standing at a fallen twig and presenting a full view to us, and was identified as a Nepal Wren-Babbler. It was a typical small, round and tailless Wren-Babbler, about 10 cm long. The bird was uniformly fulvous on its upper and under parts with dense black arrow-shaped streaks on breast and belly. Moreover, the bird did not have eye-brows.

    There are three potential wren-babbler species of such a morphological type, sympatrically occurring in the Himalayas: the Scaly-breasted Wren-Babbler (Pnoepyga albiventer), the Pygmy Wren-Babbler (P. pusilla) and the Nepal Wren-Babbler (P. immaculate). Considering the species we observed at Zhangmu, we first ruled out P. pusilla by its unspotted wings and tertials (Fig. 2). We are also very familiar with the diagnostic "three-note" song by P. pusilla, which we did not hear in this case. With respect to P. albiventer, our species apparently lacks spots on its crown, mantle and wing-covers (Fig. 2). We are therefore inclined to infer that the bird is a Nepal Wren-Babbler (P. immaculate). This species is reported to have a longer and heavier bill than P. pusilla (Grimmett et al., 1999; Rasmussen and Anderton, 2005), but it was almost impossible for us, on the basis of this trait, to make detailed comparisons in these field conditions. Afterwards, we compared our derived song type to a reference song of a putative Nepal Wren-Babbler (available at http://www.xeno-canto.org/browse.php?query=Nepal+Babbler) and consolidated our preliminary judgment about the species identification. During the next few days (until 18 May), we repeatedly heard this distinctive song at many other sites between 1800–2200 m elevation around Zhangmu County, indicating that the species might be a fairly common breeder in the region.

    Figure  2.  The Nepal Wren-Babbler (Pnoepyga immaculate) (Photo by Haitao Li)

    The Nepal Wren-Babbler has been neglected as a full species because its song was long thought to be a variant of the song of the Scaly-breasted Wren-Babbler (P. albiventer) (Martens and Eck, 1991). It has lately been realized that birds with this kind of song are morphologically differentiated from the Scaly-breasted Wren-Babbler (unspotted crown, mantle and wing-covers) and hence, the status of this unknown bird species was resolved. The Nepal Wren-Babbler is an endemic resident breeder of the Indian Subcontinent and the Himalayas, from eastern Nepal west to Himachal Pradesh in India. It is commonly found in temperate forests and subtropical or tropical moist montane habitats in undergrowth near streams and rivers (Grimmett et al., 1999; Rasmussen and Anderton, 2005). There are no records of this species in Tibet, China in any published checklist of birds of China, which is presumably due to wrong species identification resulting from neglect of subtle differences between this species and its close relatives.

    Although Zhangmu is a small town, it has become a hot birding spot in China since it has already witnessed several new records of bird species for China in recent years, including the Himalayan Bulbuls (Pycnonotus leucogenys) (Zhang et al., 2006), Tickell's Thrush (Turdus unicolor) (Yu, 2008) and the Black-chinned Babbler (Stachyridopsis pyrrhops) (Dong and Yang, 2010). More new bird species for China are expected to be recorded at this site in the future.

    We thank Yang Liu and Yat-Tung Yu for their constructive comments, which substantially improved an earlier draft. We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers who provided valuable comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. We also thank Haitao Li, Qin Wang, Li Zhang and Jia Zhong for joining our field expeditions.

  • Alivizatos H, Goutner V, Zogaris S. 2005. Contribution to the study of four owl species (Aves, Strigiformes) from mainland and island areas of Greece. Belg J Zool, 135: 109–118.
    Alvarez-Castaňda ST, Carenas N, Mendez L. 2004. Analysis of mammal remains from owl pellets (Tyto alba), in a suburban area in Baja California. J Arid Environ, 59: 59–69.
    Brown JS, Kotler BP, Smith RJ, Wirtz, WO. 1988. The effects of owl predation on the foraging behavior of heteromyid rodents. Oecologia, 76: 408–415.
    Campbell RW, Manuwal DA, Harestad AS. 1987. Food habits of the Common Barn Owl in British Columbia. Can J Zool, 65: 578–586.
    Clarke JA. 1983. Moonlight's influence on predator/prey interaction between short-eared owls (Asio filammeus) and deermice Peromyscus maniculatus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 13: 205–209.
    Dickman CR, Daly SEJ, Connell GW. 1991. Dietary Relationships of the Barn Owl and Australian Kestrel on Islands off the Coast of Western Australia. Emu, 91(2): 69–72.
    Dunmire WW. 1955. Sex dimorphism in the pelvis of rodents. J Mammal, 36(3): 356–361.
    Escarlate-Tavares F, Pessoa LM. 2005. Bats (Chiroptera, Mammalia) in Barn Owl (Tyto alba) pellets in northern pantanal, Mato Grosso, Brazil. Mastozool Neotrop Mendoza, 12(1): 61–67.
    Glue DE. 1971. Avian predator pellet analysis and the mammalogist. Mammal Rev, 21: 200–210.
    Goutner V, Alivizatos H. 2003. Diet of the barn owl (Tyto alba) and little owl (Athene noctua) in wetlands of northeastern Greece. Belg J Zool, 113: 15–22.
    Greene EC. 1935. Anatomy of the Rat. Manufactured by the Haddan Craftsmen, INC. CamDen, New Jersey, U.S.A.
    Gwynne DT. 1987. Sex-biased predation and the risky mate-locating behaviour of the tick-tock cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae). Anim Behav, 35: 571–576.
    Hall K, Newton WH. 1946. The normal course of separation of the pubes in pregnant mice. J Physiol, 104: 346–352.
    Hall K. 1947. The effects of pregnancy and relaxin on the histology of the pubic symphysis in the mouse. J Endocrinol, 5: 174–182.
    Huebschman JJ, Freeman PW, Genoways HH, Gubanyi JA. 2000. Observations on small mammals recovered from owl pellets from Nebraska. Prairie Nat, 32(4): 209–215.
    Ingels C. 1995. Summary of California studies analyzing the diet of barn owls. Sustain Agr, 7(2): 14–16.
    Iqbal HM. 1975. Evaluation of the degree of tooth wear and morphometric changes as a criterion of determining age groups in soft-furred field rat (Millardia meltada). M. Sc. Thesis. Department of Zoology, University of Agriculture, Lyallpur, Pakistan, pp 60.
    Jorgensen EE, Sell SM, Demarais S. 1998. Barn owl prey use in Chihuahuan Desert Foothills. Southwest Nat, 43(1): 53–56.
    Khan HA, Beg MA, Khan AA. 1994. Food of Barn Owl (Tyto alba) in Lower Sindh. Pak J Agr Sci, 31(3): 233–235.
    Kuno E. 1987. Principles of predator-prey interaction in the oretical, experimental and natural population systems. Adv Ecol Res, 66: 1426–1438.
    Lekunze LM, Ezealor AU, Aken'Ova T. 2001. Prey groups in the pellets of the barn owl Tyto alba (Scopoli) inthe Nigerian savanna. Afr J Ecol, 39: 38–44.
    Longland WS, Jenkins SH. 1987. Sex and age affect vulnerability of desert rodents to owl predation. J Mammal, 68: 746–754.
    Marti CD, Hogue JG. 1979. Selection of prey size in Screech Owls. Auk, 96: 319–327.
    Morris P. 1979. Rats in the diet of the barn owl (Tyto alba). J Zool Proc Zool Soc Lond, 189: 540–545.
    Morse DH. 1980. Behavioral Mechanisms in Ecology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, U.S.A.
    Mushtaq-ul-Hassan M, Ghazi RR, Noor-un-Nisa. 2007. Food preference of the Short-Eared Owl (Asio flammeus) and Barn Owl (Tyto alba) at Usta Muhammad, Balochistan, Pakistan. Turk J Zool, 31: 91–94.
    Mushtaq-ul-Hassan M, Mahmood-ul-Hassan M, Beg MA, Khan AA. 1999. Reproduction and abundance of the house shrew suncus murinus in the villages and houses of central Punjab (Pakistan). Pak J Zool, 29: 199–202.
    Mushtaq-ul-Hassan M, Raza MN, Shahazadi B, Ali A. 2004. The diet of barn owl (Tyto alba) from canal bank, canal rest house and graveyard of Gojra. J Res Sci, 15(3): 291–296.
    Roberts TJ. 1997. The Mammals of Pakistan. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
    Roberts TJ. 2005. Field guide to the Small Mammals of Pakistan. Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp 280.
    Seçkin S, Coşkun Y. 2005. Small mammals in the diet of the Long-eared Owl, Asio otus, from Diyarbakýr, Turkey. Zool Mid East, 35: 102–103.
    Seçkin S, Coşkun Y. 2006. Mammalian Remains in the Pellets of Long-eared Owls (Asio otus) in Diyarbakir Province. Turkey. Turk J Zool, 30: 271–278.
    Shehab AH, Al Charabi SM. 2006. Food of the Barn Owl Tyto alba in the Yahmool Area, Northern Syria. Turk J Zool, 30: 175–179.
    Sih A, Crowley P, McPeek M, Petranka J, Strohmeier K. 1985. Predation, competition, and prey communities: a review of field experiments. Ann Rev Ecol Syst, 16: 269–311.
    Smith DG, Wilson CR, Frost HH. 1972. Seasonal habits of barn owls in Utah. Great Basin Nat, 32: 229–234.
    Tores M, Yom-Tov Y. 2003. The Diet of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) in the Negev Desert. Isr J Zool, 49: 233–236.
    Tuttle MD, Ryan MJ. 1981. Bat predation and the evolution of frog vocalizations in the neotropics. Science, 214: 677–678.
    Twente JW, Baker RH. 1951. New records of mammals from barn owl pellets. J Mammal, 32: 120–121.
    Yom-Tov Y, Wool D. 1997. Do the contents of barn owl pellets accurately represent the proportion of prey species in the field? Condor, 99: 972–976.
    Zaman R. 1975. Age determination, age structure, sex ratio and age specific reproduction in Tatera indica (Hardwicke, 1807) population in the Punjab. Thesis, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
    Zar JH. 1996. Biostatistical Analysis. 3rd edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA, pp 662.
  • Related Articles

Catalog

    Figures(2)  /  Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (3008) PDF downloads (3028) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return