Hui WU, Haitao WANG, Yunlei JIANG, Fumin LEI, Wei GAO. 2010: Offspring sex ratio in Eurasian Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) with reversed sexual size dimorphism. Avian Research, 1(1): 36-44. DOI: 10.5122/cbirds.2009.0019
Citation: Hui WU, Haitao WANG, Yunlei JIANG, Fumin LEI, Wei GAO. 2010: Offspring sex ratio in Eurasian Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) with reversed sexual size dimorphism. Avian Research, 1(1): 36-44. DOI: 10.5122/cbirds.2009.0019

Offspring sex ratio in Eurasian Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) with reversed sexual size dimorphism

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    (H.T. Wang), wanght402@nenu.edu.cn

  • Received Date: 25 Dec 2009
  • Accepted Date: 25 Feb 2010
  • Available Online: 12 May 2023
  • Fisher's theory predicts equal sex ratios at the end of parental care if the cost associated with raising offspring of each sex is equal. However, sex ratios have important evolutionary consequences and are often biased for many factors. Reported sex ratios are often biased in raptors, which display various degrees of reversed sexual dimorphism, but there seems no consistent pattern in their offspring sex ratios. In this study, we investigated the offspring sex ratio of the Eurasian Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) and tested whether the patterns of biased sex ratios were related to laying order, egg mass, hatching order, laying date or clutch size. The brood sex ratio of the Eurasian Kestrel (male) in eggs was 47.0%, not statistically biased from 0.5, but in fledglings it was 40.8%, significantly biased from 0.5 (p=0.029). At population level, both primary and secondary sex ratios did not depart from parity. We found that clutch size and egg mass affected the secondary brood sex ratio, i.e., the larger the clutch size, the larger the number of males and eggs producing sons were heavier than eggs producing daughters. Laying date affected both the primary and secondary sex ratios, and laying earlier is associated with a greater proportion of males.

  • Jankowski's Bunting (Emberiza jankowskii) (Passeriformes: Embrizidae) was named by Taczanowski (1888). It is a small-sized grassland passerine with a body length (from bill to tail) ranging from 14.8 to 15.5 cm for males and from 14.5 to 15.5 cm for females (Gao, 2002) and can be distinguished easily from other buntings by its distinctive oval blackish-chestnut belly patch (Fig. 1a, b). It has been recently up-graded to Endangered in the IUCN Red List of globally threatened species since it is experiencing a drastic population decline (BirdLife International, 2010).

    Figure  1.  Jankowski's Bunting and its habitats. (a) male, (b) female, (c) female and nestlings in the nest, (d) nest parasitized by the Common Cuckoo, (e) current breeding habitat at the Dagang Forest Farm, (f) current breeding habitat at Keerqinyouyiqian Qi, (g) historic breeding habitat at Xianghai, (h) historic breeding habitat at Hunchun. a, photo by Wenshi Qi; bd, photos by Guohai Yu; eh, photos by Haitao Wang.

    It has long been clear that the status of Jankowski's Bunting is in urgent need of re-evaluation. We provide updated information on its distribution and population trends at known breeding sites, based on unpublished data of field surveys conducted by us. We also describe the primary characteristics of breeding habitats, breeding biology of the remaining population at the Dagang Forest Farm and the threats faced by this bird, based mainly on our published data.

    Historically, two breeding populations of this species have been known: an eastern population, with recorded breeding sites located at Dongning in Heilongjiang Province, in the Yanbian area in eastern Jilin, the extreme south of the Russian Far East and the boundary region between Russia, China and D.P.R. Korea (Yamashina, 1957; Fu and Chen, 1966; Panov, 1973; Stresemann and Portenko, 1981; Zhao et al., 1994; Fig. 2). A western population has its recorded breeding sites at Siping, Baicheng and Songyuan cities in western Jilin Province and adjacent areas of Inner Mongolia (Fu and Chen, 1966; Zhao et al., 1994; Gao, 2002). No Jankowski's Buntings were found to breed in the middle areas between the eastern and western breeding distributions. The distribution of the bunting was described as "island-like" within its rather small breeding range (Fu and Chen, 1966).

    Figure  2.  Distribution of Jankowski's Bunting. 1, breeding sites in Russia, i.e. Ussuriysk, Erdmana peninsula, Murav'yev-Amurskiy peninsula, Sedimi, Kraskino, Nagornaya, Pos'yeta bay, Krabbe peninsula, Sakpau lake and Tal'mi lake; 2, Manpo; 3, Samjiyon; 4, Hunchun; 5, Dongning; 6, Helong; 7, Antu; 8, Dunhua; 9, Nonnan; 10, Shuangliao; 11, Changling; 12, Daan; 13, Tongyu; 14, Taonan; 15, Yuquan; 16, Zhenlai; 17, Keerqinyouyiqian Qi; 18, Zhalaite Qi; 19, Qiqihaer; 20, Zhaodong; 21, Harbin; 22, Acheng; 23, Mudanjiang River; 24, Lishu; 25, Liaoyang; 26, Linxi; 27, Beidaihe; 28, Beijing.

    Jankowski's Bunting has vanished from most of its historic breeding sites during the past 40 years (Gao, 2002; Jiang et al., 2008). For the eastern population, no information has been reported in Russia since the early 1970s (Litvinenko, 1989; Litvinenko and Shibaev, 1999; BirdLife International, 2001). As well, no surviving birds were found during field surveys conducted by Wang et al. in 1997, 1999, 2004–2006 and 2010 in eastern Jilin and Dongning in Heilongjiang (unpublished data), with the last record for the eastern population in China occurring in 1980 (Fu et al., 1984). In the past, this species was recorded at Manpo and Samjiyon in the D.P.R. Korea, but no documentation is available of more recent information. Thus, the eastern population may already be extinct. The western population suffered a similar fate as the eastern population. Fu and Chen (1966) reported that the breeding range of the western population covered Taonan, Tongyu, Changling, Zhenlai in western Jilin and Tuquan in Inner Mongolia. After this, no subsequent information on the species within its breeding range has been reported for over 30 years. In 1994, Zhao et al. reported that the breeding population at Yushutai, Yaotuo and Xianghai still existed (Zhao et al., 1994); however, no birds could be found at the three breeding sites nor at most other historic breeding sites in western Jilin and Inner Mongolia during irregular field surveys conducted by Wang et al. from 1999 to 2010 (unpublished data). Its currently known breeding distribution is restricted to Xiergen and Xinjiamu of Keerqinyouyiqian Qi, Tumuji and Maanshan of Zhalaite Qi in Inner Mongolia and the Dagang Forest Farm of Zhenlai County in western Jilin (Jiang et al., 2008; Fig. 2).

    The bunting is resident at most recorded breeding sites (Yamashina, 1957; Fu and Chen, 1966). Occasionally, the species makes some migratory movements during non-breeding seasons, and sporadic wintering populations or individuals were also recorded in several regions of Inner Mongolia, Heilongjiang, Liaoning, Hebei, Beijing and the D.P.R. Korea (Morrison, 1948; Su, 1963; Stresemann and Portenko, 1981; Cheng, 1987; Huang, 1989; Fig. 2). The precise migration pattern, selection of wintering habitats and distribution for the species are still unclear.

    The remaining population of Jankowski's Bunting in the Dagang Forest Farm grassland has undergone a dramatic decline in numbers from c. 60 pairs in 1999 to c. 10 pairs in 2010 (Fig. 3). The population size at Tumuji has remained relatively constant at about three pairs (ranging from one to five pairs; Fig. 4). The breeding population at Maanshan has been monitored since 2001. Its population declined from c.11 pairs in 2001 to around three pairs in 2008 and no birds were detected in 2010 (Fig. 5). Xiergen and Xinjiamu of Keerqinyouyiqian Qi are new, recently found breeding sites for the Jankowski's Bunting. The observed maximum population size at Xiergen was 39 (25 males) in 2008, 47 (26 males) in 2009 and 53 (29 males) in 2010; for the Xinjiamu population it was 4 (2 males) in 2008, 8 (all males) in 2009 and 13 (9 males) in 2010 (unpublished data).

    Figure  3.  Population size of Jankowski's Bunting detected in 1999–2010 (except for 2003) surveys at the Dagang Forest Farm grassland in western Jilin
    Figure  4.  Population size of the Jankowski's Bunting detected in 2001–2010 (except for 2003) surveys at the Tumuji National Nature Reserve in Inner Mongolia
    Figure  5.  Population size of the Jankowski's Bunting detected in 2001–2010 (except for 2003, 2006 and 2009) surveys at Maanshan in Inner Mongolia

    The breeding season of the western population located at the Dagang Forest Farm extends from late April to late July, earlier than that of the eastern population (Yamashina, 1957; Jiang et al., 2008), which is likely caused by geographical differences. The buntings build nests under dense grass on the ground, sometimes at the base of Armeniaca sibirica or other small trees. The internal direction of the nests is mostly oriented to 45° southeast and externally 45° southwest nest building lasts for around 6–11 days (Gao et al., 2002; Jiang et al., 2008), with clutch size decreasing with nest-initiation date. The following breeding parameters were observed or measured: mean clutch size 5.26 ± 0.76 eggs (ranging from 4–7 eggs), egg laying period 5.57 ± 1.04 days (ranging from 4–8 days), incubation period 12.17 ± 0.87 days (ranging from 11–14 days), nestling period 11.45 ± 1.04 days (ranging from 10–13 days). The overall probability of Mayfield nest success to fledging is 0.218 ± 0.007 (Jiang et al., 2008). Incubation is carried out exclusively by females, with 35.0%, 74.5% and 67.6% of daytime spent for incubation during the early, middle and late incubation period respectively, while both sexes participate in building the nest, feeding the young and defending the nest (Tong et al., 2002a; Bai et al., 2003a; Jiang et al., 2008; Fig. 1a, c). Young have been observed being brought grasshoppers, caterpillars and spiders and their cocoons as food (Byers et al., 1995). Several investigators considered that Jankowski's Bunting may raise two broods per breeding season (Stresemann and Portenko, 1981; Tong et al., 2002a); however, no detailed investigations have been conducted so far on the subject.

    The reproductive progress of Jankowski's Bunting is vulnerable to disturbance. A low reproductive success may be a factor causing a decline in the number of populations and the slow recovery of populations from low reproductive periods. Known causes leading to low nest success include nest parasitization by the Common Cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) (Fig. 2c), nest predation by snakes and ants or potential nest predators such as the European Suslik (Citellus citellus) and the Amur Falcon (Falco amurensis), anthropological activities such as grazing and nest-robbing by fruit-pickers and shepherds, disease or sibling competition, nest abandonment, a lack of fertilization or embryo death (Cheng et al., 2002; Tong et al., 2002b; Bai et al., 2003a; Jiang et al., 2008).

    Jankowski's Bunting breeds in a variety of open habitats at low elevations. The western population occupies mainly the Mongolian steppes or low hills with grass species dominated by Filifolium sibiricum, Stipa baicalensis and Spodiopogon sibiricus, interspersed by Armeniaca sibirica (Gao, 2002; Gao et al., 2003). The currently known population still breeds in such habitats (Fig. 1e, f). The western population was reported to breed in savanna-like habitats with mixed shrubs of A. sibirica, Ulmus macrocarpa and U. pumila at Xianghai (Gao et al., 2002; Fig. 1g), and in afforested habitats with young Pinus sylvestris mongolica and Populus at Yaotuozi of Changling (Zhao et al., 1994). The eastern population once bred on low hills, in meadows or on coastal plains with xerophilous grass species and scattered young oak bushes, where the vegetation structure was distinct from the surrounding habitats (Yamashina, 1957; Stresemann and Portenko, 1981; Fig. 1h).

    The main reason for the possible extinction of the eastern population and drastic reduction of breeding distribution in the western population in China is the conversion of its suitable habitats into cultivated areas and possibly forest plantations. In western Jilin, over 70% native grasslands have been lost since the 1960s (Jiang et al., 2008). In Russia, Shulin (1928 in Stresemann and Portenko, 1981) reported that fires, started for agricultural purposes, affected the habitat of the bunting adversely and thus prevented its breeding. Potentially suitable habitats remaining in Russia (and presumably also in the D.P.R. Korea) are threatened by the implementation of the large-scale Tumangan Development Project (BirdLife International, 2010). These changes may lead to reduced re-colonization of its suitable habitats. In addition, unduly grazing severely destroyed the suitable microhabitats of Jankowski's Bunting, particularly grassland with Armeniaca sibirica (Gao et al., 2003; Jiang et al., 2008). Other factors such as drought and balefires may also pose a severe threat to the breeding and survival of the species, e.g., the annual average rainfall during 1999–2001 was only 235.3 mm, far below the average of 434.8 mm during 1981–1998 (Cheng et al., 2002; Bai et al., 2003b; Jiang et al., 2008).

    The preferred habitats of Jankowski's Bunting are grasslands with stunted shrubs (especially A. sibirica). The bird is sensitive to habitat loss and changes of vegetation (Gao et al., 2002). Protecting the availability and structure of its remaining breeding habitats, as well as restoring parts of its historical breeding habitats are important to ensure the continued presence of this species. The breeding habitats of Tumuji and Xiergen are well kept because they are shaded in the Tumuji and Kerqin National Nature Reserve. The current status of three other known breeding sites of Jankowski's Bunting is not encouraging. At the Dagang Forest Farm, the natural vegetation is seriously destroyed by excessive grazing (Jiang et al., 2008). At Maanshan, the suitable habitat is reduced in area and degraded in quality due to cultivation and grazing. The population at Xiergen is distributed in a small area encircled by rail fences, but the site would be unworkable if the rail fences were demolished. The Maanshan is adjacent to the Tumuji National Nature Reserve and the Xiergen borders the Keerqin National Nature Reserve. We suggest therefore that responsibility for these breeding sites should be taken over by the two Nature Reserve administrations.

    Jankowski's Bunting is a species of which few in-depth investigations have been carried out and factors that may potentially affect its survival remain largely unknown. Therefore, beside protecting the remaining breeding habitats of the bunting, we suggest that: 1) persistent surveys covering its historic distribution and potential distribution should be undertaken to obtain more reliable data on its population size, breeding distribution and wintering habitat; 2) studies on genetic population structures and diversity of the species should be conducted to obtain theoretical references and some genetic background information and 3) studies on dispersal patterns should be conducted to obtain data on its ability of re-colonizing or supplying individuals to more distant sites, which might be important for making suitable and effective management decisions and measures to protect Jankowski's Bunting.

    We thank Guohai Yu for providing some of the photos of the Jankowski's Bunting (Fig. 1b, d), Zhenxin Li for assistance in preparing the distribution map. We also thank professor Zhengwang Zhang for his helpful remarks on this paper. The work on the Jankowski's Bunting was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 30370183, 39870117).

  • Anderson DJ, Budde C, Apanius V, Gomez JEM, Bird DM, Weathers WW. 1993a. Prey size influences female competitive dominance in nestling American kestrels. Ecology, 74: 367–376
    Anderson DJ, Reeve J, Bird DM. 1997. Sexually dimorphic eggs, nestling growth and sibling competition in American Kestrels (Falco sparverius). Funct Ecol, 11: 331–335
    Anderson DJ, Reeve J, Gomez JEM, Weathers WW, Hutson S, Cunningham HV, Bird DM. 1993b. Sexual size dimorphism and food requirements of nestling birds. Can J Zool, 71: 2541–2545
    Ankney CD. 1982. Sex ratio varies with egg sequence in Lesser Snow Geese. Auk, 99: 662–666
    Appleby BM, Petty SJ, Blakey JK, Raieny P, Macdonald DW. 1997. Does variation of sex ratio enhance reproductive success of offspring in Tawny Owls (Strix aluco). Proc R Soc B, 264: 1111–1116
    Bancroft GT. 1984. Patterns of variation in size of Boat-tailed Grackle (Quiscalus major) eggs. Ibis, 126: 496–509
    Bize P, Roulin A, Telia JL, Richner H. 2005. Female-biased mortality in experimentally parasitized Alpine Swift (Apus melba) nestlings. Funct Ecol, 19: 405–413
    Blanco G, Martínez-Padilla J, Serrano D, Dávila JA, Viñuela J. 2003. Mass provisioning to different-sex eggs within the laying sequence: Consequences for adjustment of reproductive effort in a sexually dimorphic bird. J Anim Ecol, 72: 831–838
    Brommer JE, Karell P, Pihlaja T, Painter JN, Primmer CR, Pietiäinen H. 2003. Ural Owl sex allocation and parental investment under poor food conditions. Oecologia, 137: 140–147
    Burley N. 1981. Sex ratio manipulation and selection for attractiveness. Science, 211: 721–722
    Cassey P, Ewen JG, Møller AP. 2006. Revised evidence for facultative sex ratio adjustment in birds: a correction. Proc R Soc B, 273: 3129–3130
    Charnov EL. 1982. The theory of sex allocation. Monogr Popul Biol, 18: 1–355
    Cichoń M, Dubiec A, Stoczke M. 2003. Laying order and offspring sex in blue tits Parus caeruleus. J Avian Biol, 34: 355–359
    Clutton-Brock TH. 1986. Sex ratio variation in birds. Ibis, 128: 317–329
    Cramp S, Simmons KEL. 1980. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. Oxford University Press, Oxford
    Daan S, Dijkstra C, Weissing FJ. 1996. An evolutionary explanation for seasonal trends in avian sex ratios. Behav Ecol, 7: 426–430
    Deng QX, Gao W, Yang YL, Zhou T. 2006. The role of magpie in formed bird community organism in secondary forest. J Northeast Normal Univ, 38: 101–104 (in Chinese)
    Dickinson EC. 2003. The Howard and Moor Complete Checklist of the Birds of the World. 3rd ed. Princeton University Press, Princeton
    Dijkstra C, Daan S, Buker JB. 1990. Adaptive seasonal variation in the sex ratio of kestrel broods. Funct Ecol, 4: 143–147
    Don RH, Cox PT, Wainwright BJ, Baker K, Mattick JS. 1991. 'Touchdown' PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene amplification. Nucl Acids Res, 19: 4008
    Ellegren H, Gustafsson L, Sheldon BC. 1996. Sex ratio adjustment in relation to paternal attractiveness in a wild bird population. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 15: 11723–11728
    Ellegren H, Sheldon BC. 1997. New tools for sex identification and the study of sex allocation in birds. Trends Ecol Evol, 12: 255–259
    Emlen ST. 1997. When mothers prefer daughters over sons. Trends Ecol Evol, 12: 291–292
    Fargallo JA, Polo V, De Neve L, Martin J, Davila JA, Soler M. 2006. Hatching order and size-dependent mortality in relation to brood sex ratio composition in chinstrap penguins. Behav Ecol, 17: 772–778
    Ferree ED. 2007. White tail plumage and brood sex ratio in Dark-eyed Juncos (Junco hyemalis thurberi). Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 62: 109–117
    Fiala KL. 1981. Sex ratio constancy in the red-winged blackbird. Evolution, 35: 898–910
    Fisher R. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford University Press, London
    Frank SA. 1990. Sex allocation theory for birds and mammals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst, 21: 13–56
    Fridolfsson AK, Ellegren H. 1999. A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. J Avian Biol, 30: 116–121
    Geng R, Zhang XJ, Ou W, Sun HM, Lei FM, Gao W, Wang HT. 2009. Diet and prey consumption of breeding Common Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) in Northeast China. Prog Nat Sci, 19: 1501–1507
    Griffith SC, Örnborg J, Russell AF, Andersson S, Sheldon BC. 2003. Correlations between ultraviolet coloration, overwinter survival and offspring sex ratio in the Blue Tit. J Evol Biol, 16: 1045–1054
    Griggio M, Hamerstrom F, Rosenfield R N, Tavecchia G. 2002. Seasonal variation in sex ratio of fledgling American Kestrels: A long term study. Wilson Bull, 114: 474–478
    Hamilton WD. 1967. Extraordinary sex ratios. Science, 156: 477–488
    Hardy ICW. 2002. Sex Ratios: Concepts and Methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
    Heinsohn R, Legge S, Barry S. 1997. Extreme bias in sex allocation in Eclectus parrots. Proc R Soc Lond B, 264: 1325–1329
    Howe HF. 1977. Sex ratio adjustment in the Common Grackle. Science, 198: 744–745
    Kalmbach E, Nager RG, Griffiths R, Furenss RW. 2001. Increased reproductive effort results in male-biased offspring sex ratio: an experimental study in a species with reversed sexual size dimorphism. Proc R Soc B, 268: 2175–2179
    Kilner R. 1998. Primary and secondary sex ratio manipulation by Zebra Finches. Anim Behav, 56: 155–164
    Kölliker M, Heeb P, Werner I, Mateman AC, Lessells CM, Richner H. 1999. Offspring sex ratio is related to male body size in the great tit (Parus major). Behav Ecol, 10: 68–72
    Komdeur J, Daan S, Tinbergen JM, Mateman AC. 1997. Extreme adaptive modification in sex ratio of the Seychelles warbler's eggs. Nature, 385: 522–526
    Komdeur J, Magrath MJL, Krackow S. 2002. Pre-ovulation control of hatchling sex ratio in the Seychelles Warbler. Proc R Soc B, 269: 1067–1072
    Korpimäki E, May CA, Parkin DT, Wetton JH, Wiehn J. 2000. Environmental- and parental condition-related variation in sex ratio of kestrel broods. J Avian Biol, 31: 128–134
    Korsten P, Lessells CM, Mateman AC, van der Velde M, Komdeur J. 2006. Primary sex ratio adjustment to experimentally reduced male UV attractiveness in blue tits. Behav Ecol, 17: 539–546
    Krackow S. 1999. Avian sex ratio distortions: the myth of maternal control. Proc Int Ornithol Congr, 22: 425–433
    Krijgsveld KL, Daan S, Dijkstra C, Visser GH. 1998. Energy requirements for growth in relation to sexual size dimorphism in Marsh Harrier (Circus aeruginosus) nestlings. Physiol Biochem Zool, 71: 693–702
    Laaksonen T, Fargallo JA, Korpimäki E, Lyytinen S, Valkama J, Pöyri V. 2004. Year- and sex-dependent effects of experimental brood sex ratio manipulation on fledging condition of Eurasian kestrels. J Anim Ecol, 73: 342–352
    Ležalová R, Tkadlec E, Obornák M, Šimek J, Honza M. 2005. Should males come first? The relationship between offspring hatching order and sex in the Black-headed Gull (Larus ridibundus). J Avian Biol, 36: 478–483
    Legge S, Heinsohn R, Double MC, Griffiths R, Cockburn A. 2001. Complex sex allocation in the Laughing Kookaburra. Behav Ecol, 12: 524–533
    Martínez-Padilla J, Fargallo JA. 2007. Food supply during prelaying period modifies the sex-dependent investment in eggs of Eurasian Kestrels. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 61: 1735–1742
    Martins TLF. 2004. Sex-specific growth rates in zebra finch nestlings: a possible mechanism for sex ratio adjustment. Behav Ecol, 15: 174–180
    McDonald PG, Olsen PD, Cockburn A. 2005. Sex allocation and nestling survival in a dimorphic raptor: does size matter? Behav Ecol, 16: 922–930
    Nager RG, Monagham P, Griffiths R, Houston DC, Dawson R. 1999. Experimental demonstration that offspring sex ratio varies with maternal condition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 96: 570–573
    Newton I, Marquiss M. 1979. Sex ratio among nestlings of the European sparrowhawk. Am Nat, 113: 309–315
    Oddie KR, Reim C. 2002. Egg sex ratio and paternal traits: using within-individual comparisons. Behav Ecol, 13: 503–510
    Olsent PD, Cockburn A. 1991. Female-biased sex allocation in Peregrine Falcons and other raptors. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 28: 417–428
    Pike TW, Petrie M. 2003. Potential mechanisms of avian sex manipulation. Biol Rev, 78: 553–574
    Pike TW, Petrie M. 2005. Maternal body condition and plasma hormones affect offspring sex ratio in peafowl. Anim Behav, 70: 745–751
    Pike TW, Petrie M. 2006. Experimental evidence that corticosterone affects offspring sex ratios in quail. Proc R Soc B, 273: 1093–1098
    Riedstra B, Dijkstra C, Daan S. 1998. Daily energy expenditure of male and female marsh harrier nestlings. Auk, 115: 635–641
    Rutkowska J, Badyaev AV. 2008. Meiotic drive and sex determination: molecular and cytological mechanisms of sex ratio adjustment in birds. Philos T R Soc B, 363: 1675–1686
    Rutkowska J, Cichoń M. 2006. Maternal testosterone affects the primary sex ratio and offspring survival in Zebra Finches. Anim Behav, 71: 1283–1288
    Rutstein AN, Slater PJB, Graves JA. 2004. Diet quality and resource allocation in the zebra finch. Proc R Soc Lond B, 271(Suppl. ): 286–289
    Sheldon BC. 1998. Recent studies of avian sex ratios. Heredity, 80: 397–402
    Slagsvold T, Sandvik J, Rofstad G, Husby M. 1984. On the adaptive value of intraclutch egg-size variation in birds. Auk, 101: 685–697
    Tella JL, Donazar JA, Negro JJ, Hiraldo F. 1996. Seasonal and interannual variations in the sex-ratio of Lesser Kestrel (Falco naumanni) broods. Ibis, 138: 342–345
    Torres R, Drummond H. 1997. Female-biased mortality in nestlings of a bird with size dimorphism. J Anim Ecol, 66: 859–865
    Trivers RL, Willard DE. 1973. Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science, 179: 90–92
    Village A. 1990. The Kestrel. Poyser, London
    Wegge P. 1980. Distorted sex ratio among small broods in a declining Capercaillie population. Ornis Scand, 11: 106–109
    West SA, Sheldon BC. 2002. Constraints in the evolution of sex ratio adjustment. Science, 295: 1685–1688
    Xiang GQ, Gao W, Feng HL. 1991. The study on breeding ecology of European Magpie (Pica pica). In: Gao W (ed) Chinese Bird Study. Chinese Science Press, Beijing, pp 102–106 (in Chinese)
    Zar JH. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood
    Zhou T, Wang HT, Liu Y, Lei FM, Gao W. 2009. Patterns of magpie nest utilization by a nesting raptor community in a secondary forest. Prog Nat Sci, 19: 1253–1259
  • Related Articles

Catalog

    Figures(4)  /  Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (4246) PDF downloads (1987) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return