Lyubov Malinovskaya, Elena Shnaider, Pavel Borodin, Anna Torgasheva. 2018: Karyotypes and recombination patterns of the Common Swift (Apus apus Linnaeus, 1758) and Eurasian Hobby (Falco subbuteo Linnaeus, 1758). Avian Research, 9(1): 4. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-018-0096-7
Citation: Lyubov Malinovskaya, Elena Shnaider, Pavel Borodin, Anna Torgasheva. 2018: Karyotypes and recombination patterns of the Common Swift (Apus apus Linnaeus, 1758) and Eurasian Hobby (Falco subbuteo Linnaeus, 1758). Avian Research, 9(1): 4. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-018-0096-7

Karyotypes and recombination patterns of the Common Swift (Apus apus Linnaeus, 1758) and Eurasian Hobby (Falco subbuteo Linnaeus, 1758)

Funds: 

the Russian Foundation for Basic Research Grant# 16-04-00087

the Federal Agency for Scientifc Organizations via the Institute of Cytology and Genetics Grant # 0324-2018-0019

The funding bodies play no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis 

interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript 

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Anna Torgasheva, torgasheva@bionet.nsc.ru

  • Received Date: 06 Dec 2017
  • Accepted Date: 13 Jan 2018
  • Available Online: 24 Apr 2022
  • Publish Date: 01 Feb 2018
  • Background 

    Meiotic recombination is an important source of genetic variability. Studies on mammals demonstrate a substantial interspecies variation in overall recombination rate, which is dependent mainly on chromosome (2n) and chromosome arm number (FN). Bird karyotypes are very conservative with 2n being about 78-82 and FN being 80-90 in most species. However, some families such as Apodidae (swifts) and Falconidae (falcons) show a substantial karyotypic variation. In this study, we describe the somatic and pachytene karyotypes of the male Common Swift (Apus apus) and the pachytene karyotype of the male Eurasian Hobby (Falco subbuteo) and estimate the overall number and distribution of recombination events along the chromosomes of these species.

    Methods 

    The somatic karyotype was examined in bone marrow cells. Pachytene chromosome spreads were prepared from spermatocytes of adult males. Synaptonemal complexes and mature recombination nodules were visualized with antibodies to SYCP3 and MLH1 proteins correspondingly.

    Results 

    The karyotype of the Common Swift consists of three metacentric, three submetacentric and two telocentric macrochromosomes and 31 telocentric microchromosomes (2n = 78; FN = 90). It differs from the karyotypes of related Apodidae species described previously. The karyotype of the Eurasian Hobby contains one metacentric and 13 telocentric macrochromosomes and one metacentric and ten telocentric microchromosomes (2n = 50; FN = 54) and is similar to that described previously in 2n, but differs for macrochromosome morphology. Despite an about 40% difference in 2n and FN, these species have almost the same number of recombination nodules per genome: 51.4 ± 4.3 in the swift and 51.1 ± 6.7 in the hobby. The distribution of the recombination nodules along the macrochromosomes was extremely polarized in the Common Swift and was rather even in the Eurasian Hobby.

    Conclusions 

    This study adds two more species to the short list of birds in which the number and distribution of recombination nodules have been examined. Our data confirm that recombination rate in birds is substantially higher than that in mammals, but shows rather a low interspecies variability. Even a substantial reduction in chromosome number does not lead to any substantial decrease in recombination rate. More data from different taxa are required to draw statistically supported conclusions about the evolution of recombination in birds.

  • Correction to: Avian Res (2018) 9:31

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-018-0123-8

    Unfortunately, the original article (Fuchs and Zuccon 2018) contained some errors. The Tables 1, 2 and Additional file 1: Table S2 were displayed incorrectly. The correct tables can be found below.

    Table  1.  Details of the six specimens of Orthotomus rufceps from southern Vietnam (original label mention is Cochinchina) collected by Louis Rodolphe Germain and representing, to our knowledge, the only specimens deposited in natural history museums
    Collector Catalog number Sex Collection Date Locality Country
    Germain L.R. MNHN ZO 1866-573 Female 28 February 1864 'Cochinchina' Vietnam
    Germain L.R. MNHN ZO 1882-738 Male 'Cochinchina' Vietnam
    Germain L.R. MNHN ZO 1882-739 Female 21 April 1865 'Cochinchina' Vietnam
    Germain L.R. MNHN ZO 1882-740 Female 'Cochinchina' Vietnam
    Germain L.R. MNHN ZO 1882-742 Male 29 February 1864 'Cochinchina' Vietnam
    Germain L.R. SMF 78404 Male 'Cochinchina' Vietnam
    The specimen in Senckenberg was previously cataloged at MNHN with the number MNHN ZO 1882-741; this specimen was not sequenced
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table  2.  Details of the nine specimens of Orthotomus sequenced as part of this study
    Species Collector Catalog number Collection date Locality Country
    ruficeps Germain L.R. MNHN ZO 1866-573 28 February 1864 'Cochinchina' Vietnam
    ruficeps Germain L.R. MNHN ZO 1882-738 'Cochinchina' Vietnam
    ruficeps Germain L.R. MNHN ZO 1882-739 21 April 1865 'Cochinchina' Vietnam
    ruficeps Germain L.R. MNHN ZO 1882-740 'Cochinchina' Vietnam
    ruficeps Germain L.R. MNHN ZO 1882-742 29 February 1864 'Cochinchina' Vietnam
    atrogularis Germain L.R. MNHN ZO 1882-728 13 April 1867 'Saigon, Cochinchina' Vietnam
    atrogularis J. Delacour/P. Jabouille MNHN ZO 1929-1463 27 February 1928 Phu-Qui Vietnam
    atrogularis J. Delacour/P. Jabouille MNHN ZO 1939-913 25 January 1930 Hoi-Xuan Vietnam
    atrogularis J. Roche/J. Thiney MNHN ZO 1989-120 17 December 1986 Trang Thailand
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Additional file 1: Table S2. Measurement details for the specimens included in the biometric analyses.

    The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-018-0123-8.

  • Anderson LK, Reeves A, Webb LM, Ashley T.1999. Distribution of crossing over on mouse synaptonemal complexes using immunofluorescent localization of MLH1 protein. Genetics, 151:1569-79.
    Aslam ML, Bastiaansen JWM, Crooijmans RPMA, Vereijken A, Megens H-J, Groenen MAM.2010. A SNP based linkage map of the turkey genome reveals multiple intrachromosomal rearrangements between the turkey and chicken genomes. BMC Genom, 11:647.
    Backström N, Forstmeier W, Schielzeth H, Mellenius H, Nam K, Bolund E, Webster MT, Öst T, Schneider M, Kempenaers B, Ellegren H.2010. The recombination landscape of the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata genome. Genome Res, 20(4):485-95.
    Berchowitz LE, Copenhaver GP.2010. Genetic interference: don't stand so close to me. Curr Genom, 11:91-102.
    Borodin PM, Basheva EA, Zhelezova AI.2009. Immunocytological analysis of meiotic recombination in the American mink (Mustela vison). Anim Genet, 40:235-8.
    Calderon PL, Pigozzi MI.2006. MLH1-focus mapping in birds shows equal recombination between sexes and diversity of crossover patterns. Chromosome Res, 14:605-12.
    Capilla L, Garcia Caldés M, Ruiz-Herrera A.2016. Mammalian meiotic recombination: a toolbox for genome evolution. Cytogenet Genome Res, 150:1-6.
    Christidis L. Animal cytogenetics 4: Chordata 3; B, Aves. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger; 1990.
    Dapper AL, Payseur BA. Connecting theory and data to understand recombination rate evolution. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0469.
    Dawson DA, Åkesson M, Burke T, Pemberton JM, Slate J, Hansson B.2007. Gene order and recombination rate in homologous chromosome regions of the chicken and a passerine bird. Mol Biol Evol, 24:1537-52.
    del Priore L, Pigozzi MI.2017. Broad-scale recombination pattern in the primitive bird Rhea americana (Ratites, Palaeognathae). PLoS ONE, 12:e0187549.
    Dumont BL, Payseur BA.2008. Evolution of the genomic rate of recombination in mammals. Evolution, 62:276-94.
    Frohlich J, Vozdova M, Kubickova S, Cernohorska H, Sebestova H, Rubes J.2015. Variation of meiotic recombination rates and MLH1 foci distribution in spermatocytes of cattle, sheep and goats. Cytogenet Genome Res, 146:211-21.
    Graphodatsky AS, Sablina OV, Meyer MN, Malikov VG, Isakova EA, Trifonov VA, Polyakov AV, Lushnikova TP, Vorobieva NV, Serdyukova NA, Perelman PL, Borodin PM, Benda P, Frynta D, Leikepová L, Munclinger P, Piálek J, Sádlová J, Zima J.2000. Comparative cytogenetics of hamsters of the genus Calomyscus. Cytogenet Genome Res, 88:296-304.
    Gregory TR. Animal genome size database. 2017. . com. Accessed 9 Nov 2017
    Griffin D, Burt DW.2014. All chromosomes great and small: 10 years on. Chromosome Res, 22:1-6.
    Groenen MAM, Wahlberg P, Foglio M, Cheng HH, Megens H-J, Crooijmans RPMA, Besnier F, Lathrop M, Muir WM, Wong GKS, Gut I, Andersson L.2009. A high-density SNP-based linkage map of the chicken genome reveals sequence features correlated with recombination rate. Genome Res, 19:510-9.
    Hansson B, Ljungqvist M, Dawson DA, Mueller JC, Olano-Marin J, Ellegren H, Nilsson J-Å.2010. Avian genome evolution: insights from a linkage map of the blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus). Heredity, 104:67-78.
    Jaari S, Li M-H, Merilä J.2009. A first-generation microsatellite-based genetic linkage map of the Siberian jay (Perisoreus infaustus): insights into avian genome evolution. BMC Genom, 10:1.
    Jetz W, Thomas GH, Joy JB, Hartmann K, Mooers AO.2012. The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature, 491:444-8.
    Kasai F, Garcia C, Arruga MV, Ferguson-Smith MA.2003. Chromosome homology between chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) and the red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa); evidence of the occurrence of a neocentromere during evolution. Cytogenet Genome Res, 102:326-30.
    Kawakami T, Smeds L, Backström N, Husby A, Qvarnström A, Mugal CF, Olason P, Ellegren H.2014. A high-density linkage map enables a second-generation collared flycatcher genome assembly and reveals the patterns of avian recombination rate variation and chromosomal evolution. Mol Ecol, 23:4035-58.
    Kleckner N, Storlazzi A, Zickler D.2003. Coordinate variation in meiotic pachytene SC length and total crossover/chiasma frequency under conditions of constant DNA length. Trends Genet, 19:623-8.
    Lisachov AP, Malinovskaya LP, Druzyaka AV, Borodin PM, Torgasheva AA. Synapsis and recombination of autosomes and sex chromosomes in two terns (Sternidae, Charadriiformes, Aves). Vavilovskii Zhurnal Genet Selektsii. 2017a;21:259-68 (in Russian).
    Lisachov AP, Trifonov VA, Giovannotti M, Ferguson-Smith MA, Borodin PM. Heteromorphism of "homomorphic" sex chromosomes in two anole species (Squamata, Dactyloidae) revealed by synaptonemal complex analysis. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2017b;151:89-95.
    Lisachov AP, Trifonov VA, Giovannotti M, Ferguson-Smith MA, Borodin PM. Immunocytological analysis of meiotic recombination in two anole lizards (Squamata, Dactyloidae). Comp Cytogenet. 2017c;11:129-41.
    Lisachov AP, Zadesenets KS, Rubtsov NB, Borodin PM. Sex chromosome synapsis and recombination in male guppies. Zebrafish, 2015, 12:174-80.
    Moens PB.2006. Zebrafish: chiasmata and interference. Genome, 49:205-8.
    Nishida C, Ishijima J, Kosaka A, Tanabe H, Habermann FA, Griffin DK, Matsuda Y.2008. Characterization of chromosome structures of Falconinae (Falconidae, Falconiformes, Aves) by chromosome painting and delineation of chromosome rearrangements during their differentiation. Chromosome Res, 16:171-81.
    Pardo-Manuel de Villena F, de Sapienza C.2001. Recombination is proportional to the number of chromosome arms in mammals. Mamm Genome, 12:318-22.
    Peters AH, Plug AW, van Vugt MJ, de Boer P.1997. A drying-down technique for the spreading of mammalian meiocytes from the male and female germline. Chromosome Res, 5:66-8.
    Peterson DG, Stack SM, Healy JL, Donohoe BS, Anderson LK.1994. The relationship between synaptonemal complex length and genome size in four vertebrate classes (Osteicthyes, Reptilia, Aves, Mammalia). Chromosome Res, 2:153-62.
    Pigozzi MI.2001. Distribution of MLH1 foci on the synaptonemal complexes of chicken oocytes. Cytogenet Cell Genet, 95:129-33.
    Pigozzi MI.2016. The chromosomes of birds during meiosis. Cytogenet Genome Res, 150:128-38.
    Pigozzi MI, del Priore L.2016. Meiotic recombination analysis in female ducks (Anas platyrhynchos). Genetica, 144:307-12.
    Pigozzi MI, Solari AJ.1999. Equal frequencies of recombination nodules in both sexes of the pigeon suggest a basic difference with eutherian mammals. Genome, 42:315-21.
    Reeves A.2001. MicroMeasure: a new computer program for the collection and analysis of cytogenetic data. Genome, 44:439-43.
    Ritz KR, Noor MAF, Singh ND.2017. Variation in recombination rate: adaptive or not? Trends Genet, 33:364-74.
    Ross J, McNulty S, Sullivan B. The epigenetics of centromere function. In: Chadwick BP, editor. Epigenetics. Norfolk: Caister Academic Press; 2015. p. 133-66.
    Scanes CG. Sturkie's avian physiology. 6th ed. London: Academic Press; 2014.
    Segura J, Ferretti L, Ramos-Onsins S, Capilla L, FarréM Reis F, Oliver-Bonet M, Fernández-Bellón H, Garcia F, Garcia-Caldés M, Robinson TJ, Ruiz-Herrera A.2013. Evolution of recombination in eutherian mammals: insights into mechanisms that affect recombination rates and crossover interference. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci, 280:1945.
    Skinner BM, Griffin DK.2012. Intrachromosomal rearrangements in avian genome evolution: evidence for regions prone to breakpoints. Heredity, 108:37-41.
    Stack SM.1984. Heterochromatin, the synaptonemal complex and crossing over. J Cell Sci, 71:159-76.
    Stapley J, Ferretti L, Ramos-Onsins S, Capilla L, Farré M, Reis F, Oliver-Bonet M, Fernández-Bellón H, Garcia F, Garcia-Caldés M, Robinson TJ, Ruiz-Herrera A.2017. Variation in recombination frequency and distribution across eukaryotes: patterns and processes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B, 372:20160455.
    Torgasheva AA, Borodin PM.2017. Immunocytological analysis of meiotic recombination in the gray goose (Anser anser). Cytogenet Genome Res, 151:27-35.
    Torres RA, Ribeiro J, Adam ML.2004. Genetic discontinuity and evolutionary scenario among Neotropical and Old World swift species (Aves: Apodiformes: Apodidae). Caryologia, 57:177-83.
    van Oers K, Santure AW, De Cauwer I, van Bers NEM, Crooijmans RPMA, Sheldon BC, Visser ME, Slate J, Groenen MAM.2014. Replicated high-density genetic maps of two great tit populations reveal fine-scale genomic departures from sex-equal recombination rates. Heredity, 112:307-16.
    Wang ML, Chen FY.1998. Study on karyotype of Hobby (Falco subbuteo) and Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus). J Forest Res, 9:108-10.
    Wright NA, Gregory TR, Witt CC. Metabolic “engines” of flight drive genome size reduction in birds. Proc R Soc B. 2014. .
    Yadav JS, Arora RB, Yadav AS.1995. Karyotypes of two species of Indian birds and localization of nucleolus organizer regions. Cytobios, 82:159-69.

Catalog

    Figures(4)  /  Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (234) PDF downloads (6) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return