Volume 13 Issue 1
Mar.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Shilong Liu, Qiao Xie, Aiwu Jiang, Eben Goodale. 2022: Investigating how different classes of nest predators respond to the playback of the begging calls of nestling birds. Avian Research, 13(1): 100044. doi: 10.1016/j.avrs.2022.100044
Citation: Shilong Liu, Qiao Xie, Aiwu Jiang, Eben Goodale. 2022: Investigating how different classes of nest predators respond to the playback of the begging calls of nestling birds. Avian Research, 13(1): 100044. doi: 10.1016/j.avrs.2022.100044

Investigating how different classes of nest predators respond to the playback of the begging calls of nestling birds

doi: 10.1016/j.avrs.2022.100044
More Information
  • Corresponding author: E-mail address: aiwuu@163.com (A. Jiang)
  • Received Date: 20 May 2022
  • Accepted Date: 15 Jun 2022
  • Rev Recd Date: 15 Jun 2022
  • Available Online: 11 Oct 2022
  • Publish Date: 22 Jun 2022
  • Begging brings benefits and costs for nestling birds: it can indicate their needs to their parents, but it can also be a cue used by predators to find the nest. The costs, like many variables related to nest predation, can be specific to what kinds of predators are present and their auditory capabilities. These costs and benefits could also be affected by human noise, as noise could disrupt communication to parents and eavesdropping by predators, although human-produced noise might be easily ignored if predators can hear high-frequency components of the begging. We studied nest predation on a generalist bird, the Red-whiskered Bulbul (Pycnonotus jocosus), in a tropical forest in which there are many kinds of nest predators, including birds, mammals and reptiles. In 20 natural nests in which artificial eggs were placed, and subsequently in 140 artificial nests, we broadcast recordings of begging nestlings, with and without traffic noise, at two volume levels. We hypothesized that playback would increase predation relative to a silent control, and that mixing in traffic noise with the begging would decrease predation, as the begging signal was masked. However, we hypothesized that some predators, particularly small mammals with sensitive high-frequency hearing, might ignore the traffic noise. We found that predation was lowest for the control treatment, and lower for treatments mixed with traffic noise than for those without it. Small mammals, however, showed an unexpected pattern, displaying less nest predation in the treatments with traffic noise. Our results demonstrate the human-associated noise can disturb nest predators and influence which kinds of predators use begging to locate nests.


  • loading
  • Bednarz, P.A., 2021. Do decibels matter? A review of effects of traffic noise on terrestrial small mammals and bats. Pol. J. Ecol. 68, 323-333.
    Brawn, J.D., Angehr, G., Davros, N., Robinson, W.D., Styrsky, J.N., Tarwater, C.E., 2011. Sources of variation in the nesting success of understory tropical birds. J. Avian Biol. 42, 61-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-048X.2010.04897.x
    Brumm, H., Zollinger, S.A., 2011. The evolution of the Lombard effect: 100 years of psychoacoustic research. Behaviour 148, 1173-1198. doi: 10.1163/000579511X605759
    Chalfoun, A.D., Thompson Ⅲ, F.R., Ratnaswamy, M.J., 2002. Nest predators and fragmentation: a review and meta-analysis. Conserv. Biol. 16, 306-318. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00308.x
    Chotprasertkoon, T., Pierce, A.J., Savini, T., Round, P.D., Sankamethawee, W., Gale, G.A., 2017. Influence of vegetation cover on nest cavity selection and nesting success of White-rumped Shamas (Copsychus malabaricus): an experimental test. Wilson J. Ornithol. 129, 727-741. doi: 10.1676/16-134.1
    DeGregorio, B.A., Chiavacci, S.J., Benson, T.J., Sperry, J.H., Weatherhead, P.J., 2016. Nest predators of North American birds: continental patterns and implications. Bioscience 66, 655-665. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biw071
    Fair, J., Paul, E., Jones, J., 2010. Guidelines to the Use of Wild Birds in Research. Ornithological Council, Washington D.C.
    Francis, C.D., Barber, J.R., 2013. A framework for understanding noise impacts on wildlife: an urgent conservation priority. Front. Ecol. Environ. 11, 305-313. doi: 10.1890/120183
    Francis, C.D., Ortega, C.P., Cruz, A., 2009. Noise pollution changes avian communities and species interactions. Curr. Biol. 19, 1415-1419. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.06.052
    Haff, T.M., Magrath, R.D., 2011. Calling at a cost: elevated nestling calling attracts predators to active nests. Biol. Lett. 7, 493-495. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.1125
    Haskell, D., 1994. Experimental evidence that nestling begging behaviour incurs a cost due to nest predation. Proc. R. Soc. B. 257, 161-164. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1994.0110
    Haskell, D., 1999. The effect of predation on begging-call evolution in nestling wood warblers. Anim. Behav. 57, 893-901. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1053
    Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., Westfall, P., 2008. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom. J. 50, 346-363. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200810425
    Hu, Q., Wen, Y., Yu, G., Yin, J., Guan, H., Lv, L., et al., 2020. Research activity does not affect nest predation rates of the Silver-throated Tit, a passerine bird building domed nests. Avian Res. 11, 28. doi: 10.1186/s40657-020-00214-9
    Ibáñez-Álamo, J.D., Arco, L., Soler, M., 2012a. Experimental evidence for a predation cost of begging using active nests and real chicks. J. Ornithol. 153, 801-807. doi: 10.1007/s10336-011-0797-8
    Ibáñez-Álamo, J.D., Magrath, R.D., Oteyza, J.C., Chalfoun, A.D., Haff, T.M., Schmidt, K.A., et al., 2015. Nest predation research: recent findings and future perspectives. J. Ornithol. 156, S247-S262.
    Ibáñez-Álamo, J.D., Sanllorente, O., Soler, M., 2012b. The impact of researcher disturbance on nest predation rates: a meta-analysis. Ibis 154, 5-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2011.01186.x
    Ibáñez-Álamo, J.D., Soler, M., 2010. Investigator activities reduce nest predation in blackbirds Turdus merula. J. Avian Biol. 41, 208-212. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-048X.2009.04805.x
    Jiang, A., Jiang, D., Zhou, F., Goodale, E., 2017. Nest-site selection and breeding ecology of Streaked Wren-Babbler (Napothera brevicaudata) in a tropical limestone forest of southern China. Avian Res. 8, 28. doi: 10.1186/s40657-017-0086-1
    Jiang, D., Nong, Z., Jiang, A., Luo, X., 2015. Breeding ecology and nest site selection of Red-whiskered Bulbul (Pycnonotus jocosus) in limestone area, northern tropical region of China. Chin. J. Zool. 50, 359-365.
    Jiang, D., Zhou, F., Chen, T., Jiang, A., 2013. Breeding notes on 18 bird species in limestone area of southwestern Guangxi. Chin. J. Zool. 48, 597-604.
    Khamcha, D., Powell, L.A., Gale, G.A., 2018. Effects of roadside edge on nest predators and nest survival of Asian tropical forest birds. Global Ecol. Conserv. 16, e00450. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00450
    Klump, G.M., Kretzschmar, E., Curio, E., 1986. The hearing of an avian predator and its avian prey. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18, 317-323. doi: 10.1007/BF00299662
    Leighton, P.A., Horrocks, J.A., Kramer, D.L., 2010. Conservation and the scarecrow effect: can human activity benefit threatened species by displacing predators? Biol. Conserv. 143, 2156-2163. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.05.028
    Leonard, M.L., Horn, A.G., 2005. Ambient noise and the design of begging signals. Proc. R. Soc. B. 272, 651-656. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.3021
    Li, H., Goodale, E., Quan, R. -C., 2019. Nest predation on an abundant generalist bird in tropical China. Wilson J. Ornithol. 131, 514-523. doi: 10.1676/18-115
    Magrath, R.D., Haff, T.M., Horn, A.G., Leonard, M.L., 2010. Calling in the face of danger: predation risk and acoustic communication by parent birds and their offspring. Adv. Stud. Behav. 41, 187-253. doi: 10.1016/S0065-3454(10)41006-2
    Martin, T.E., 2015. Age-related mortality explains life history strategies of tropical and temperate songbirds. Science 349, 966-970. doi: 10.1126/science.aad1173
    Martin, T.E., Scott, J., Menge, C., 2000. Nest predation increases with parental activity: separating nest site and parental activity effects. Proc. R. Soc. B. 267, 2287-2293. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1281
    McDonald, P.G., Wilson, D.R., Evans, C.S., 2009. Nestling begging increases predation risk, regardless of spectral characteristics or avian mobbing. Behav. Ecol. 20, 821-829. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arp066
    McGregor, R.L., Bender, D.J., Fahrig, L., 2008. Do small mammals avoid roads because of the traffic? J. Appl. Ecol. 45, 117-123.
    Miller, J.R., Hobbs, N.T., 2000. Recreational trails, human activity, and nest predation in lowland riparian areas. Landsc. Urban Plann. 50, 227-236. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00091-8
    Moreno-Rueda, G., 2005. A trade-off between predation risk and sibling competition in the begging behavior of Coal and Great Tits. J. Field Ornithol. 76, 390-394. doi: 10.1648/0273-8570-76.4.390
    Nemeth, E., Brumm, H., 2010. Birds and anthropogenic noise: Are urban songs adaptive? Am. Nat. 176, 465-475. doi: 10.1086/656275
    Pierce, A.J., Pobprasert, K., 2013. Nest predators of southeast Asian evergreen forest birds identified through continuous video recording. Ibis 155, 419-423. doi: 10.1111/ibi.12033
    Platzen, D., Magrath, R.D., 2004. Parental alarm calls suppress nestling vocalization. Proc. R. Soc. B. 271, 1271-1276. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2716
    Portfors, C.V., 2007. Types and functions of ultrasonic vocalizations in laboratory rats and mice. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 46, 28-34.
    R Core Team, 2021. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/.
    Ricklefs, R.E., 1969. An Analysis of Nesting Mortality in Birds. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington, DC.
    Slabbekoorn, H., Peet, M., 2003. Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature 424, 267, 267.
    Soanes, R., Peters, A., Delhey, K., Doody, J.S., 2015. The influence of nest-site choice and predator sensory cues on nesting success in the Crimson Finch (Neochmia phaeton). Emu 115, 317-325. doi: 10.1071/MU14046
    Somsiri, K., Gale, G.A., Pierce, A.J., Khamcha, D., Sankamethawee, W., 2020. Habitat structure affects nest predation of the Scaly-crowned Babbler (Malacopteron cinereum) by macaques and snakes in a Thai-seasonal evergreen forest. J. Ornithol. 161, 389-398. doi: 10.1007/s10336-019-01724-0
    Stephens, S.E., Koons, D.N., Rotella, J.J., Willey, D.W., 2004. Effects of habitat fragmentation on avian nesting success: a review of the evidence at multiple spatial scales. Biol. Conserv. 115, 101-110. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00098-3
    Stutchbury, B.J., Morton, E.S., 2001. Behavioral Ecology of Tropical Birds. Academic Press, London.
    Tan, X., Liu, S., Goodale, E., Jiang, A., 2022. Does bird photography affect nest predation and feeding frequency? Avian Res. 13, 100036. doi: 10.1016/j.avrs.2022.100036
    Thompson Ⅲ, F.R., Burhans, D.E., 2004. Differences in predators of artificial and real songbird nests: evidence of bias in artificial nest studies. Conserv. Biol. 18, 373-380. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00167.x
    Vetter, D., Rücker, G., Storch, I., 2013. A meta-analysis of tropical forest edge effects on bird nest predation risk: edge effects in avian nest predation. Biol. Conserv. 159, 382-395. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.12.023
    Vincze, E., Seress, G., Lagisz, M., Nakagawa, S., Dingemanse, N.J., Sprau, P., 2017. Does urbanization affect predation of bird nests? A meta-analysis. Front. Ecol. Evol. 5, 29. doi: 10.24193/subbeuropaea.2017.3.02
    Zanette, L., 2002. What do artificial nests tells us about nest predation? Biol. Conserv. 103, 323-329. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00143-4
  • 加载中


    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(3)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (27) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views


    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint