Volume 13 Issue 1
Mar.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  Avian Research  > 2022  >  13: 100010.
Yiting Jiang, Yujia Bi, Ruiyao Ma, Jing Zhang, Dongmei Wan. 2022: The spatial distribution and breeding behavior of neighbors affect the reproductive success of tits. Avian Research, 13(1): 100010. doi: 10.1016/j.avrs.2022.100010
Citation: Yiting Jiang, Yujia Bi, Ruiyao Ma, Jing Zhang, Dongmei Wan. 2022: The spatial distribution and breeding behavior of neighbors affect the reproductive success of tits. Avian Research, 13(1): 100010. doi: 10.1016/j.avrs.2022.100010
shu

The spatial distribution and breeding behavior of neighbors affect the reproductive success of tits

doi: 10.1016/j.avrs.2022.100010

  • Laboratory of Animal Resource and Epidemic Prevention, School of Life Sciences, Liaoning University, Shenyang, 110036, China

More Information
  • Corresponding author: E-mail address: wandongmei@lnu.edu.cn (D. Wan)
  • Received Date: 15 Mar 2021
  • Accepted Date: 26 Dec 2021
  • Publish Date: 24 Feb 2022
    Abstract
  • The spatial distribution and breeding behavior of neighboring birds (conspecific and heterospecific) may influence reproduction and the effects differ across species. In this study, we investigated intra- and inter-specific spatial distribution of breeding via artificial nestboxes and examined whether overlap with neighbors affected reproductive success of the focal breeding pair. Regarding spatial distribution, Varied Tits (Sittiparus varius) and Cinereous Tits (Parus cinereus) showed similar pattern: distances of nestboxes containing conspecific tits were greater than those with heterospecific ones. In terms of breeding behavior, reproductive success was not significantly related to the distance from their neighbor’s nest. The reproductive success of Varied Tits was significantly related to that of their neighbors, while in Cinereous Tits, no strong link was found to any recorded reproductive behavior of the neighbors. These findings explain spatial variation in nest site selection of Varied Tits and Cinereous Tits. Reproductive success rate of Varied Tits is affected by that of the neighbors while that of Cinereous Tits is not. The results highlight that there are differences in reproductive outcome among related species and offer suggestions on the use of artificial nestboxes in experiment and conservation programs.

     

    • 1 The two authors contributed equally to the project.
    FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(25)
  • Birkhead TR, Johnson SD, Nettleship DN. Extra-pair matings and mate guarding in the Common Murre Uria Aalge. Anim Behav. 1985; 33: 608-619 doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(85)80085-3
    Boucher-Lalonde V, Morin A, Currie DJ. A consistent occupancy-climate relationship across birds and mammals of the Americas. Oikos. 2014; 123:1029-1036 doi: 10.1111/oik.01277
    David M, Auclair Y, Cezilly F. Personality predicts social dominance in Female Zebra Finches, Taeniopygia guttata, in a feeding context. Anim Behav. 2011; 81:219-224 doi: 10.3917/fp.021.0219
    Deeming DC, Biddle LE, Christopher RF. Interspecific and intraspecific spatial separation by birds breeding in nest boxes. Avian Conserv Ecol. 2017; 12:1
    Dhondt, A.A., 1977. Interspecific competition between Great and Blue Tit. Nature 268, 521–523 doi: 10.1038/268521a0
    Dhondt AA. Effects of competition on great and blue tit reproduction: Intensity and importance in relation to habitat quality. J Anim Ecol. 2010; 79: 257-265 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01624.x
    Dhondt, A.A., 2012. Interspecific competition in birds. In: Birkhead, T.R. (Ed.), Oxford Avian Biology Series. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
    Evans MR, Lank DB, Boyd WS, Cooke FA. Comparison of the characteristics and fate of Barrow’s Goldeneye and Bufflehead nests in nest boxes and natural cavities. The Condor. 2002; 104:610-619 doi: 10.1093/condor/104.3.610
    Finch DM. Effects of predation and competitor interference on nesting success of house wrens and tree swallows. The Condor. 1990; 92:674-687 doi: 10.2307/1368686
    Fowler, J., Cohen, L., Jarvis, P., 1998. Practical Statics for Field Biology, second ed. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
    Gurevitch J, Morrow LL, Wallace A, Walsh JS. A meta-analysis of competition in field experiments. Am Nat. 1992; 140:539-572 doi: 10.1086/285428
    Kruger O, Chakarov N, Nielsen JT, Looft V, Grunkorn T, Struwe-Juhl B, et al. Population regulation by habitat heterogeneity or individual adjustment? J Anim Ecol. 2012; 81:330-340 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01904.x
    Laube, I., 2011. Avian Range Dynamics: Traits, Biotic Interactions and Niches. Ph.D thesis. Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt.
    Mand RV, Tilgar A, Lohmus, Leivits A. Providing nest boxes for hole-nesting birds - does habitat matter? Biodiver Conserv. 2005; 14:1823-1840 doi: 10.1007/s10531-004-1039-7
    Martin TE. Nest predation and nest sites new perspectives on old patterns. BioScience. 1993; 43:523-532 doi: 10.2307/1311947
    Martin TE. Food as a limit on breeding birds: A life-history perspective. Ann Rev Ecol System. 1987; 18:453-487 doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.18.110187.002321
    Martinez-Rivera CC, Gerhardt HC. Advertisement-call modification, male competition, and female preference in the bird-voiced treefrog Hla avivoca. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2008; 63:195-208 doi: 10.1007/s00265-008-0650-0
    Minot EO, Perrins CM . Interspecific interference competition - nest sites for blue and great tits. J Anim Ecol. 1986; 55: 331-350 doi: 10.2307/4712
    Moeller AP, Adriaensen F, Artemyev A, Banbura J, Barba E, Biard C. Clutch-size variation in western Palaearctic secondary hole-nesting passerine birds in relation to nest box design. Methods Ecol Evol. 2014; 5:353-362 doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12160
    Moeller AP, Balbontin J, Dhondt AA, Remes V, Adriaensen F, Biard C. Effects of interspecific coexistence on laying date and clutch size in two closely related species of hole-nesting birds. J Anim Ecol. 2018; 87:1738-1748 doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12896
    Schoener TW. Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am Nat. 1983; 122:240-285 doi: 10.1086/284133
    Szabo ND, Algar AC, Kerr JT. Reconciling topographic and climatic effects on widespread and range-restricted species richness. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2009; 18:735-744 doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00479.x
    Tarjuelo R, Morales MB, Arroyo B, Manosa S, Bota G, Casas F. Intraspecific and interspecific competition induces dependent habitat niche shifts in an endangered steppe bird. Ecol Evol. 2017; 7:9720-9730 doi: 10.1002/ece3.3444
    Teather KL. An experimental study of competition for food between male and female nestlings of the red-winged blackbird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1992; 31:81-87 doi: 10.1007/BF00166340
    Zhang L, Wang J, Wan DM, Bi YJ, Zhang L. Narrow or wide distribution? A comparison of behavioral traits between the Varied Tit (Sittiparus varius) and Great Tit (Parus cinereus). Chin J Zool. 2019; 54:471-477
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(3)  / Tables(2)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (216) PDF downloads(3) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd   Technical support: info@rhhz.net

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return